Reply to post:

Amazon attempts rule fudge to take exclusive control of new dot-words

VinceH

I'm confuzzled.

Is this article anti-Amazon FUD, or is something simply not being made clear?

Following the link, I don't see anything in the wording that could be described as a "rule fudge" that would allow it to take control of other .words (and one of the example .words near the top of the article is .book, which the article later notes is one of Amazon's anyway).

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon