Constable Savage
Has been promoted ....
London cops have broken data protection rules by using a controversial database that ranks people's likelihood of gang-related violence but fails to distinguish between victims and perps, and low and high-risk people. The UK's data protection watchdog today reported there had been "multiple and serious" breaches in the use of …
@Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse, @}{amis}{
It's probably a little bit of both. Started life as an Excel doc, then got a bit unwieldy, some bright spark commissioner somewhere suggested something along the lines "can't this be turned into some kind of shared database thingy?", they then imported it into an Access file (probably Access 2003), clunked a simple front end on it, then they copied and pasted it to all their mates.
Methinks you are giving Commissioners more credit than is due - usually its some "hobby IT" copper who thinks they are the Met's answer to Jeff Bezos who makes a shitty app when they are off duty and brings it in on a USB stick, taking it home to work on. Without encryption of course.
At some point it gets the attention of some inspector who pushes DoI to adopt it formally in order to get it into wider use. At that point some smart arse will point out that the whole thing is crap and needs work. Hobby Bobby gets seconded to DoI and servers get built.
In cases like this one it's not just WHAT it says that is sensitive but the fact that you are in the database at all - which may infer an association. So just basic identity information name address etc. would be highly sensitive as it may imply a gang association. So "green" listing people is just as bad. Approaches such as saying oh I will encrypt the sensitive fields doesn't cut it.
Same in healthcare - if your name is in the database for adult mental healthcare and addictions for whatever minor or past reason just the identity management database is serious stuff.
When they say 'Gang' is this just a 'database' of mainly black men on the street?
I mean, does it include the often white gangs involved in Drug dealing, Burglary, Fraud, Money Laundering etc..
Does it also include the gangs who like to bombard old people with charity requests, leading to suicide in some cases.
The Pension management fraud gangs? on average victims lose around £91,000
Just trying to get a grip on whether this is THE one true Gang Matrix or really the 'Black Street Gang Matrix'
Am I the only one that finds it depressing that this Youtube: Not the nine o'clock news Constable Savage sketch still rings true is as depressing now as it was in the 70s??
> I mean, does it include the often white gangs involved in Drug dealing, Burglary, Fraud, Money Laundering etc..
Presumably
> Does it also include the gangs who like to bombard old people with charity requests, leading to suicide in some cases.
No. Only illegal gangs.
> The Pension management fraud gangs? on average victims lose around £91,000
Ditto.
> Just trying to get a grip on whether this is THE one true Gang Matrix or really the 'Black Street Gang Matrix'
It's a little more complicated than that. Take the Yardies for example, they are a Jamaican gang. Most of their members are young black men, for the simple reason that not many old white women apply to join. The Yardies diversity manager would dearly love to hire some old white women, but there just isn't the talent available.
There is no gang called “the Yardies” and never has been. Yardie just means a Jamaican, someone from “the Yard” ie home, Jamaica - it was only when the cops started using as a catch-all term for young black men that it came to be a synonym for gangster.
But much of the problem starts with who gets called a gang. I’m exaggerating slightly but you get three white boys who hang around together and they’re lads; you get three black kids who do the same thing and the cops call them a gang and put them on the Gangs Database for further attention and investigation...
When they say 'Gang' is this just a 'database' of mainly black men on the street?
I realise you are probably be asking the question in an ironic way, but lol no, whilst it is mainly a 'database' of black men on the street it also, presumably, includes people like John Sentamu in its selection criteria because of his history of police contact
Just trying to get a grip on whether this is THE one true Gang Matrix or really the 'Black Street Gang Matrix'
Given that it refers to Boroughs having independent versions and diametrically opposing policies on what intelligence goes in, plus widespread copying of data to local storage it seems most likely that this is being parked on someone's PC somewhere rather than being a properly managed central system on a server that MPS has oversight of.
Which adds credence to the idea it's likely just an Access DB somewhere with a front end slapped on or even a hefty Excel file.
"Has anyone checked for a database that ranks members of the police force's likelihood of criminal-related activity ?"
A policeman was convicted this week for being a predator on young girls. He apparently joined the force in order to get access to vulnerable girls. At the time of his application he was already a named suspect in other forces' investigations.
It could be suggested that those who take a zealous position on suppressing a particular criminal activity - are likely to have a predilection for that themselves. This has been fictionalised in "Red Dragon" and "Silence of the Lambs". Colloquially acknowledged in the saying "poacher turned gamekeeper" and vice versa.
The major part of their duties are "criminal-related".
The relevant question is are they helping or hindering...
Supposedly Wyatt Earp said something along the lines of it didnt matter which side of the law business you were working, so long as you had a base on the legitimate side..
Owing to the despicable tendency of criminals to be economical with the truth, it may well not be possible to make that distinction. Indeed it may not even be a useful distinction, as one imagines being a victim of one gang may encourage previously unassociated people to seek membership of another.
I imagine this is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to unprotected information that the police and other authoritative bodies have squirrelled away. And by squirrelled away I mean under a desk, in a car etc. Not to mention all the private companies that have tonnes of data going back years. I imagine that when new laws pass or new systems come into existence the old ones aren't cleansed or data migrated properly, they're just hidden away. Out of sight, out of mind.