It depends what it is I suppose. I know for a fact there a few sites out there handing out video training courses ripped off from Lynda and Pluralsight, they're backed by S3 buckets for the storage. A silly example but it's still copyright infringement and still an offence. Imagine the storage is used for kiddie porn or dodgy vids of some nutjob fundamentalist preaching his bullshit. AWS has a lot of useful services and not everyone has the brains to realise that "CLOUD = SOMEONE ELSE'S COMPUTER" and as such they can search your data if they wish.
Amazon coughs up record amount of info to subpoena-happy US government
Amazon received more than 2,000 requests for information from governments – and approved almost 900 in full - in the first six months of 2017. The figures come in the web giant's biannual information access report (PDF), which reveals it handed over more information on its customers to the US government than ever before. …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Monday 8th January 2018 14:07 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Surprised the numbers are that low
For all we know a single request could contain a lot of information. Just because they "object...to overbroad or otherwise inappropriate" requests doesn't mean that they don't hand over the required information, especially when they're talking about NSA requests
-