Keep any humans out the loop, does that include oracle's own wetware?
This is the same oracle that has a long and rich history of changing things without trying for consistancy (TNSListnr passwords changed from if you defined them they were more secure, to if you applied the same logic you made the install less secure in the next release is just one example that springs to mind from years back), the vast swathes of default users to be compared against Pete Finnigans list's, and who have just a week or two back released a strutt's update (I was pretty shocked to see that, because I hadn't realized they hadn't patched it months ago!).
More likely the operational result will be less humans to see their dirty laundry, as the C level's will have bought the kool aid and stopped their testing of the innards, because its automated and defends itself with buzzwords like machine learning right?