Doesn't surprise me ...
Dealt with them a few years ago ...
The Information Commissioner's Office has fined Fareham telco Onecom Limited £100,000 for sending spam texts. The unwanted messages for mobile phone upgrades were sent between late 2015 and June 2016. The ICO received 1,050 complaints about the spam campaign. Although 944 of the messages did not identify the company, the ICO …
Phoenix companies were my number one pet hate until I had protracted correspondence about it with the relevant Minister of State a few years back. He said there was no evidence that this sort of thing was a serious issue. Of course he was lying. So I transferred my number one pet hate to Ministers.
Pleasingly, shortly after our correspondence, that particular Minister was sent to prison for lying:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Aitken#Libel.2C_arrest_and_prison
"In a statement, the business said: "Onecom operates in a highly regulated sector and is utterly committed to upholding the highest standards in all our communications with our clients and the public. Consequently we consider this incident to have been most serious and have undertaken an internal review which has resulted in our further tightening our systems and controls to ensure that there is no repetition. We are pleased to note that no subsequent complaints have been received and that the Information Commissioner has acknowledged our remedial measures."
Which translated from insincere grovelling PR drivel:
"We will endeavour not to get caught and fined next time and instead will use a shell company out of Belize for all future marketing campaigns"
"In a statement, the business said: "Onecom operates in a highly regulated sector and is utterly committed to upholding the highest standards in all our communications with our clients and the public."
So committed you sent spam.
"Consequently we consider this incident to have been most serious and have undertaken an internal review which has resulted in our further tightening our systems and controls to ensure that there is no repetition. We are pleased to note that no subsequent complaints have been received and that the Information Commissioner has acknowledged our remedial measures."
A review that makes the ICO think you are doing something and to hopefully reduce the fine.
Same time next month with a different company name?