back to article Ohi-D'oh! US prison hands inmates' SSNs over to... an identity thief

Prison authorities in Ohio, US, mistakenly provided the social security numbers of thousands of inmates to a man convicted of identity theft. The Mansfield News Journal says it was directly contacted by Lonny Bristow, who said he was sent the social security numbers of more than 2,000 prisoners when he made a public records …

  1. Frumious Bandersnatch

    This particular FOI request

    needed more chokey-points.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    And what is the average credit score for a convicted fellon?

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    Card application declined.

    ....

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: And what is the average credit score for a convicted fellon?

      Not all identity theft is about applying for credit in someone's name. If you were an illegal immigrant who wanted to use someone else's social security number to get a job, you couldn't do better than a prison inmate's number - you don't have to worry about him getting a job and raising red flags when there are W2s for full time jobs in two different states.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Whoever provided that information ..

    Whoever provided that information should be sent to .. oh. Umm.

    :)

  4. EnviableOne
    FAIL

    Why not tell them they made a mistake?

    "I knew I had to turn it into the media, I actually am truly done with the criminal life. Life's too short. I could've used those Social Security numbers to open a credit card account but I didn't."

    nice to see that telling the media is no 1, not telling them they sent you the wrong info!

    1. DNTP

      Re: Why not tell them they made a mistake?

      Yeah, because based on this guy's past, the authorities wouldn't have made him a scapegoat and used that to sweep the whole affair under the rug.

      In a completely fair world, it's reasonable to expect the accidental receiver of a leak to contact the sender before going completely public, and work out some kind of productive narrative that improves security in the future; in this case the balance of power is completely unfair.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like