back to article Australia needs a technology industry policy debate

Neither of Australia's parties of government has a useful policy or plan for the technology portfolios beyond an attachment to buzzwords and a wish to emulate Silicon Valley. Here's how to identify policy cluelessness: anyone naming Uber as a significant employer. It's not now, it will not be in the future, and yet both of …

  1. mathew42
    FAIL

    > The only meaningful difference between government and opposition at the moment is in their NBN policy, and that doesn't matter. Labor's Jason Clare can say as he pleases, he can't reverse the current government's purchase of the hybrid fibre coax networks, or the copper telephony network, or the deployment of fibre-to-the-node nodes.

    The reason it doesn't matter is because of Labor's decision to build a fibre network with speed tiers starting at 12Mbps currently 79% of people on fibre are connected at 25Mbps or slower. The ironic part of this is that if you removed speed tiers from FTTN & HFC these networks would be faster for the overwhelming majority of Australians than Labor's FTTP with speed tiers.

    Labor could have locked the country into a FTTP path but instead muffed everything beyond the 'good idea' phase.

  2. Charles Manning

    The best policies

    1) Don't interfere.

    2) Just stand back and let us do what we know how to do.

    All you really need to do to screw something up is make it into a government programme.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon