"Go, baby, go!!!!" -- Walter Cronkite
Sick burn, brah: SpaceX test fires rockets for SES bird launch this week
SpaceX reports that it's ready to roll for Wednesday's satellite launch, which will be followed by another attempt to get one of the Falcon 9 rockets to land on a water-borne platform. Luxembourg-based SES is paying SpaceX to loft a new communications satellite into geostationary orbit along the equator at 108.2 degrees east …
COMMENTS
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 07:38 GMT imanidiot
Late night viewing
For those interested, the launch window for the SES9 mission is 23:46:14-01:23 GMT. So anyone who wants to watch on the UK/Euro side of the pond has a late night ahead.
--> Hopefully only from the right end -->
The next SpaceX missions are not until April (launch dates and times TBD)
-
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 10:26 GMT James Hughes 1
Re: Newsspeak
Wow. Orwellian.
Real Orwellian would be not having presenters, webstreams livestreaming, or any sort of information at all given to the public.
I really think you should readjust your expectations, and be happy with the plethora of information we get but have no right to whatsoever.
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 23:52 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Newsspeak
Who pretends it didn't happen? Each time they haven't landed successfully before, Elon Musk has said "well it didn't land this time for this reason. We have fixed that and will try again". Eventually they will have fixed all the issues they have found and it will land.
This is what happens when you test bleeding edge kit. Test, learn something, fix. test again.
Compare this to the white elephant that is the F35. I reckon Elon will successfully land many of his rockets on water long before the Navy start landing their F35s on the Queen Elizabeth.
-
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 07:57 GMT John Smith 19
As usual it's a 50/50 chance.
May work, may not.
The good news is they've fixed all the stuff that went wrong before so either that's all problems fixed or they've found another item that needs to be tided up for next time.
Which might be the last item that needs to be fixed and the next one after this comes down like a charm.
Or not, in which that fix list gets a bit longer.
Thursday morning should be interesting.
-
Wednesday 24th February 2016 05:39 GMT Weapon
Re: As usual it's a 50/50 chance.
The change of this one landing is as I mentioned above really slim. It has nothing to do with how far it progressed and everything to do with the fact that they are launching a really heavy payload into a high orbit. To the point where most people didn't even think they would do a water landing even.
The more fuel, the higher the margin of error as it can run the throttle longer thus have more time to adjust. With so little fuel, this attempt is most likely under 10% chance. It literally has to perform perfect. My guess is the only reason why SpaceX is even doing it is to gather more data and attempt more difficult maneuvers.
The next one should be a real attempt. That said, despite the low odds of this one, I am hopeful.
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 14:33 GMT Tikimon
Failure is never permanent
The rocket may crash, or it may land intact. And then crash again the next trip! It doesn't matter, because they're steadily learning and making the rockets better. Eventually you solve all the problems and have a reliable rocket that lands beautifully every time.
They'll get it eventually. Might be this time, even.
-
Tuesday 23rd February 2016 20:33 GMT Hopalong
Down play
The mission press release is down playing the chances of an successful landing of the first stage. SpaceX is using the performance reserve normally used to recover the stage to give SES-9 a shorter transfer time to GEO, So the stage will have the minimum amount of fuel and Lox left to try for the barge..
-
Wednesday 24th February 2016 02:24 GMT Martin Budden
And of course if one engine fails on the way up the satellite should still get there but the water landing will probably be scrubbed (i.e. the first stage will just ditch) because of the extra fuel needed to fly with just 8 remaining engines. All of which is fine by me, it's great to see such a flexible system with built-in redundancy.