Re: Comments' time indication
Nope. It says "in the last few minutes", whatever that means.
Hint to ElReg: Computers are rather good a timestamping stuff.
Shaun's tried to post this on the Boot's thread: Philosophy is not dead, it just smells funny. I see an "Approve" and "Reject" buttons - not sure why - but Approve doesn't work. Did it trip a spam checker?
This topic was created by Andrew Orlowski .
Exactly :-) But, to be honest, I got some useful information from Usenet on very specific topics.
Back to my original post, it seems to be a problem with Opera. Time indication starts "An hour ago" and also the edit function is not available. Then again, Opera has never really been supported by ElReg's site. Maybe another reason why I'm writing this comment twice - the first attempt just disappeared.
Would it be possible to make the anon flag of a post editable as well (for the 10 minute edit status)? At the moment, the post itself can be edited for 10 minutes, but not its anon status, which means a post withdrawal and re-submit to correct that..
Not really a bug, but I don't have Flash installed which means none of the embeded youtube videos work because you're using the flash player.
I wouldn't mention it, except for the fact that I know you could use an HTML5 player.
For example, in the recent article on the PiPhone [1], I just see a big grey "plugin missing" box, but if I navigate to the source article [2] (where they are using the HTML5 player), it plays perfectly well.
[1] (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/28/chap_builds_mobe_based_on_raspberry_pi/)
[2] (http://www.davidhunt.ie/piphone-a-raspberry-pi-based-smartphone/)
Also, If I remember correctly, you're using some weird overlay which obscures the 'youtube' logo bottom right, thus making it impossible to click through to the video's page on youtube.
I'm all in favour of laws when they make sense, so how about you give the finger to this stupid legal cookie warning requirement.
In the unlikely event you get taken to court, you'd have a whole lot of competent tech guys who'd stand up for you. Thoughts?
We would put our heads above the parapet on an important point of principle or to defend ourselves and/ or a source against a vexatious libel suit. Otherwise, we take the the view with law that it is more important not to lose than to win Lawsuits soak up management time and money. And sometimes they add a great deal of stress.
So the answer is no - we will observe the law, however stupid we think it is.
for the last few days (probably all week) - whenever accessing the register from IE10 or 11 (work and home - 3 different computers) - one of the CPU cores is maxed out, and IE hangs - it doesn't happen on all parts of the site - or all the time - but it is regular enough to become a real annoyance - i cannot change to any other site, i need to crash out of IE completely to proceed.
Chrome doesn't seem to have any issues - but i have noticed the same problem on 2 laptops and a desktop - all after accessing the register.
I told myself I wouldn't be a pedant, but when I saw it today, I couldn't help it anymore:
If the WinPhone app is unable to load an article it informs me that it's unable to 'retreive' the content.
The fact that it throws up an error message from time to time is one thing, but could you please, please, please fix the typo? "i" before "e" and all that.
Much obliged.
Something very strange going on in this article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/25/schmidt_hits_the_fanbois_samsung_had_your_shiny_new_toys_years_ago/
Looks like an </object> tag is missing.
And while I'm here, can I ask what the justification for the Register overlay on youtube videos is? It's mildly irritating that I can't close adverts and popups in the videos, and the link to the video's page on youtube is not working.
> Not our overlay
> This is a Bloomberg video
Sorry, yes, I was actually referring to the youtube videos that appear in other articles.
> I think the video tag was fixed a while ago.
In the article I mentioned? Curiously it still appears broken to me in Chromium 37.0 (in both Ubuntu 14.04 and Windows 7)
The Android app on a Samsung galaxy s4 (Android 4.4.2 currently) had two very annoying bugs.
It fails opening stories that have any embedded video - the whole article, not just the video itself. It gives a page not loaded error in the frame where the text should be
Second, it randomly fails to load the comments page for some articles- can't see any pattern to it, probably 25 % of the time. It gives a connectivity error as though there is no Internet access, but it happens on wifi as well as on cellular data and when I switch to the browser I have no problem getting to the article on the Web site.
I barely use the Android app any more as it is so buggy. Sorry!
The front page's oldest story is 'Five days old' 24 Dec 2014 at 11:13,
Clicking on 'Older Stories' and the latest story is: NINE days old 20 Dec 2014 at 01:33
All the news stories between them don't seem to listed:-(
n.b.The new policy of having things listed as X days old rather than giving a posted date/time is a real pain. Many people will know I last read thereg on say 23rd/24th at 4p.m.
Post a comment. Oops. Edit comment. Wait for premod approval. Approved. Post goes down the back of the sofa.
Confirmed by sofafication of duplicate of this post.
(and while I'm here, I doubt rendered pages should be saying "window.top.$(function() { window.top.$('#advertise-bg').css('position', 'fixed'); });" at the bottom, but that may be my odd browser)
Are different adverts allowed to load different scripts?
I only ask because some of the ads - most notably the O2 one that has been appearing recently - that appear in the page background don't seem to move unless you might click on the page, at which point the position of the advert is updated.
Previously some adverts stuttered about in terms of position as I scrolled which suggests to me that position was being controlled via JavaScript rather than by CSS. Other page background adverts - the ones that do seem to be controlled via CSS - seem to be unaffected and the position doesn't seem to move at all (or rather still get displayed no matter how much I scroll).
This post has been deleted by its author
Every now and again, the header of my daily list of links will be chopped short at some random position and have a lower case "b" appended.
Does anyone else see this? Is it Outlook 2007 that's (mis)interpreting something unexpected in the mail? Have I duplicate-posted a bug that's been reported before? (I searched; did not find).
There seems to be a bug with the positioning of some of the ads when they're placed above the banner. The ads seem to move downwards as the user scrolls down until it covers the register logo at which point it remains static (so if the user scrolls any further than that the ad doesn't move any further).
The problem is that the positioning seems to be aligned to the top of both images and doesn't take into account the height of the advert being moved (or at any rate I assume this is what's happening).
Some of the ads are much taller than most and there have been a few occasions now where the advert - always one for Microsoft for some reason - not only covers the top banner but also the forums links for 'My posts', 'User topics' and the others located in the right hand column.
This post has been deleted by its author