back to article Firefox doesn't need to be No 1 – and that's OK, 'cos it's falling off a cliff

Just in case you didn't believe Firefox was on a trajectory that should have it crash and burn into extinction in the next couple of years, former chief technology officer Andreas Gal has usage stats that confirm it. To use Gal's words: "Firefox market share is falling off a cliff." The same could be said of Firefox itself. …

Page:

    1. Steve Davies 3 Silver badge

      did you know....?

      That you can change the position and even what button are displayed by FireFox?

      Probably not. But you can do it. I did mine years ago never went back to anything else.

      1. Dave K

        Re: did you know....?

        That's the problem with Australis.

        Now, the navigation buttons are fixed, and the stop/reload button is also fixed at the end of the address bar. Only way around it for now is to use an addon that gives you the ability to move these, but these will stop working once Firefox 57 lands (ClassicThemeRestorer being a major addon rendered useless by Mozilla dropping their old addon system as the new addon system simply doesn't support what CTR does).

      2. bombastic bob Silver badge
        Devil

        Re: did you know....?

        Yes, the 'Classic UI' plugins are AWESOME. With a bit of hacking, you can even ELIMINATE the 'hamburger'

        1. Updraft102

          Re: did you know....?

          Dispatching the hamburger is easy:

          #PanelUI-menu-button {

          display: none;

          }

          Add that to userChrome.css. Should work on Thunderbird too, though I haven't tested it (my TB burger is gone via the "Classic TB2 Options" extension.

    2. Psy-Q

      Why don't you use the keyboard shortcut for reload if it is an important and often-used function for you? Even less mousing -- none!

    3. Alister

      Then, as a developer, the reload button is an annoying distance away from the navigation buttons causing instant and constant extra mousing around.

      Um, "as a developer", you do know you can customise the toolbars such that the reload button can be next to the navigation buttons?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Developers use Ctrl+r until the ink wears off their r key.

        1. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

          On my keyboard, only the "Q", "U" ,"I", "P", "G", "J", and "K" are intact. There are seven keys that are completely blank. ("E", "A", "L", and I can't remember what the rest are.) The "W", "O", "X" and "B" are readable. And every other has a sketchy dots or ambiguous bars. The left shift, control are on their way out, too; as are the "," and "." and "/".

          1. Alistair
            Windows

            @B.A.G

            I have 7 completely clear keys on my HP8570w's keyboard. Since its backlit, they provide sufficient light to read things on my desk when the lights are off. Three more are getting there.

        2. Wibble

          > Developers use Ctrl+r until the ink wears off their r key.

          You mean Cmd+R. Not all of us use windos.

          1. bombastic bob Silver badge
            Devil

            Developers use Ctrl+r until the ink wears off their r key.

            You mean Cmd+R. Not all of us use windos.

            it's F5 for me, but maybe CTRL+R will work, too. Using FreeBSD. Also works in Linux.

            1. MaxRock

              Those two have slightly differen't functions, don't they?

              F5 reloads the page using the browser cache, while CTRL+R bypasses the cache.

        3. ITS Retired
          Happy

          I use an old IBM PC keyboard. It could double as a boat anchor and the keys, make their own click. I don't need the computer to make a click sound with each key press. All the legends look like they are still new.

          The only thing missing are the windows key, and who uses those, except fanboys anyway? Until I found this keyboard in a dumpster with an 286/386, I had worn the legends off of several keyboards. With my four finger typing, I need to be able to see the key legends.

      2. Alan Hope

        "Um, "as a developer", you do know you can customise the toolbars such that the reload button can be next to the navigation buttons?"

        Just tried it again. You can drag/drop all the other buttons but not the reload button.

        Which then begs the question... why not include the reload button in the toolbar customisation?

        Anyway, it was just 1 of many small things. Maybe I've just become too familiar with Chrome.

        1. CRConrad
          Facepalm

          "Just tried it again. You can drag/drop all the other buttons but not the reload button."

          Perhaps not the one inside the address box. But the other one, yes you can. Waitasec... Yes, you can; I just did. Well, added one, since I didn't have it on the toolbar, knowing what the keyboard is for. Gimmasec again... Yup, you can move it too; just moved it from the right to the left of the back / forward arrows.

          You can't put the reload (or any) button _between_ the arrow ones, it seems; they're linked, move as a unit. (Dunno how long they've done that; been aeons since I last customised the toolbar.) But next to them on either side, no problem.

    4. jasper pepper

      Comodo dragon. Chrome without the feed to Google.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        I'd quite forgotten that one. I've been almost entirely using Palemoon, have been since it was "the" x64 Firefox. Adding Dragon into the mix. It'll do the duty for Chrome related thingies. Thanks!

      2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        "Comodo dragon. Chrome without the feed to Google."

        Hmmm. Wanted to download a .exe & run it with Crossover Office which was once installed & now isn't. I'm impressed. But not favourably.

    5. Jonathan 27

      As a developer, you could hit F5 instead of the refresh button. Saves a second or two each time and if you do it 100 times a day it adds up.

    6. Sgt_Oddball

      You refresh using the mouse? How long before something in chrome looks dated? And for clunky experiences I tried developing on chrome for a few days. Hated every second of it.

      (Fyi being able to view what javascript addresses what elements directly is a massive boon and anything without it seems backwards now)

    7. Orv Silver badge

      It's also hard to switch back and forth between the two browsers' development tool suites. It's not that one is necessarily superior -- I find Firefox a little better for HTML tinkering, Chrome a little better for Javascript debugging. But they're just different enough to feel awkward when you switch.

    8. bombastic bob Silver badge
      Thumb Down

      "as a developer, the reload button is an annoying distance away from the navigation buttons"

      What, you mousie-clickie EVERYTHING? Try the 'F5' key...

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        "Try the 'F5' key..."

        Try browsing with mainly one hand on the mouse, and the other hand far away from the keyboard.

        1. CRConrad
          Childcatcher

          Re: "Try the 'F5' key..."

          "Try browsing with mainly one hand on the mouse, and the other hand far away from the keyboard."

          But he was talking "blah blah developer blah blah", not pornhub-dot-com.

    9. CRConrad
      Holmes

      Honestly, "as a developer" -- huh?

      You claim to be a developer, and have a problem with "the reload button is an annoying distance away from the navigation buttons causing instant and constant extra mousing around"?

      So if you couldn't be arsed to customise your toolbar by dragging the navigation buttons to the right of the URL textbox (with its own reload button on the right end), then why didn't you just add a dedicated reload button next to wherever you keep the arrow ones?

      Or maybe get a keyboard with function keys and try F5...?

      Sorry, but I'm having trouble swallowing your "developer" credentials.

  1. AMBxx Silver badge
    Stop

    Google isn't neglecting the web the way Microsoft did with IE

    Microsoft only stopped innovating when they had total domincance. IE4 was far ahead of the competition. IE5 sealed the market share. Then they just stopped.

    Netscape 4/5 were bloated and ugly. IE4 was beautiful in comparison.

    Yes, they abused standards terribly, but they took 90%+ market share first. Google aren't there yet.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Google isn't neglecting the web the way Microsoft did with IE

      Google doesn't want market share so they can try to embrace/extend their own web standards like Microsoft. They want market share so they can collect information on every site you visit all the time, all the better to sell you out to advertisers and make them more money. Different motivations.

      It is important to have an alternative that isn't selling you out to Google (or Microsoft) so Firefox needs to stick around. But Google's monopoly abuse lying about Firefox being 'insecure' versus Chrome is basically their standard business tactic these days, making it harder and harder for Firefox to compete on a level playing field.

      Hopefully we'll see more monopoly investigations of Google and even bigger fines - that's the only thing that is going to get them to stop this. Fining them half a quarter's profits isn't enough.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Google isn't neglecting the web the way Microsoft did with IE

      I still remember the dark age of the Internet (late 1990s to early-mid 2000s) no thanks to Microsoft.

      'Best viewed with Internet Explorer' banners on websites everywhere.

      Websites made with Microsoft Frontpage.

      Realplayer (and to a lesser extent, Windows Media Player and Apple's Quicktime) needed to be installed or you couldn't watch the videos online.

      And never forget it was Microsoft which had through despicable means destroyed Netscape Navigator (later Netscape Communicator), setting up IE's monopoly during this dark and desolate time. A remnant of Netscape's code made its way to Mozilla, and eventually the browser Firefox was born.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Google isn't neglecting the web the way Microsoft did with IE

        It was definitely a hard time to be a Linux desktop user, but fortunately there were almost no videos worth watching so running into WMP or QT videos wasn't an issue. The "best viewed with IE" thing didn't bother me, except where it was true and the site really did look like crap on Mozilla!

        Ironic that Flash was Linux's savior from the hell of proprietary video. If only they had separated Flash the streaming player from Flash the UI, all those security holes would have infected the UI and the streamer might still be useful.

      2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: Google isn't neglecting the web the way Microsoft did with IE

        "A remnant of Netscape's code made its way to Mozilla, and eventually the browser Firefox was born."

        An even bigger remnant than you thought. Seamonkey was also born.

  2. MrNed
    WTF?

    blocked?

    A non-techy friend asked me just the other day to install Firefox for him because he didn't like the Chrome browser that had been pre-installed on the 2nd hand machine he'd been given. Lo and behold, Chrome would not download the Firefox installer stub - said the downloader page was unavailable. Visiting the same link with IE showed that the page was working fine; Firefox was duly installed.

    So are Google blocking access to rival browser's installers?

    1. Graham 32

      Re: blocked?

      I doubt Google would do that. The public backlash would be too big.

      My guess is some spyware/adware addon to Chrome is installed and it's that which wants to stop you switching to another browser.

    2. Naselus

      Re: blocked?

      Nope, downloads absolutely fine in Chrome for me.

    3. eldakka

      Re: blocked?

      First thing to do when given a 2nd-hand machine:

      format, re-partition, reinstall stock standard OS (whether that be windows, linux, MacOS, BSD, anything).

    4. WatAWorld

      Re: blocked?

      "So are Google blocking access to rival browser's installers?"

      Not on my computer. It just downloaded fine.

  3. Colin Ritchie
    Windows

    Losing market share?

    Firefox had a netmarket share of 12.03% in July 2015 and has 12.02% share now, according to https://www.netmarketshare.com/. While its use dipped to 7.69% back in June 2016 it has since recovered, mainly at the expense of IE and Safari.

    I know many XP and Windows 7 refusniks who use it now and refuse to have a bar of Chrome. Not being the most used browser is sometimes a good thing, you are not the biggest target either.

  4. Paul Crawford Silver badge

    Make privacy a USP

    All products need a reason to succeed, beyond basic brand loyalty. Also known as a "unique selling point" to marketers.

    So do what Google won't do: make privacy a big deal.

    Make your default to block/separate tracking cookies, avoid browser fingerprinting by technical means (e.g. randomly dither the query-able factors, don't report plug-ins, report always the same OS/version "I am Spartacus", etc) and whatever else you can do to help (e.g. Duck duck go for search, or at least warn people about it). Offer ad-blocking as default (or the setup wizard to chose a matching plug-in), make a simple menu option to stop auto-play videos and animated GIFs, etc.

    And FFS stop copying Chrome's every dumb-down-the-user move!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Make privacy a USP

      "So do what Google won't do: make privacy a big deal."

      Something on the order of 80% of Mozilla's income comes from royalties from its users using a search plugin. Until very recently those royalties came from Google. Mozilla have even less impetus to care about your privacy than Google.

    2. Wibble
      Megaphone

      Re: Make privacy a USP

      > So do what Google won't do: make privacy a big deal.

      In this day of facebook and twitter you bring up privacy?

      I feel a lone voice in the wilderness by not being a product of the companies who slurp everything.

  5. Zippy's Sausage Factory

    I abandoned Firefox a while ago. Pale Moon for the last maybe 2 years, never looked back.

  6. kmac499

    Chrome - No Thanks

    I dislike Chrome because of it's cartoon like interface, I like the File Edit View menu tool bar. Firefox was easily 'fixed' with the classic theme restorer extension..

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Chrome - No Thanks

      Same here. Mainly because it is a device for Google to get data on you, your searches and pretty well everything else.

      Some people don't give a toss about that. That is their right.

      I do.

      I don't use Google directly for web searching either. I'm keeping my distance from that AI Slurper.

      If you Google for me you won't find anything. Lots of people with the same name as me but nothing on me. I fully intend to keep it that way. Google IS EVIL.

      I kinda like stability so I use Firefox ESR (Extended Service Release). Currently on 52.2.1 on MacOS. does what it says on the tin for 99.9% of sites.

  7. ArchieTheAlbatross
    Happy

    A Night at the Opera, anyone?

    Still a good, mostly crap-free browser, not quite as flexible as Firefox, but nowadays with a free VPN, which must be a good thing.

    That said, it's pretty much Firefox with everything here and likely to continue that way for the foreseeable future.

    1. Naselus

      Re: A Night at the Opera, anyone?

      Opera went downhill fast about five years ago and has never really recovered. These days, Vivaldi is the browser for the discerning power user.

      1. Orv Silver badge

        Re: A Night at the Opera, anyone?

        Opera's mobile browser is pretty good, and faster than Chrome or Firefox on my phone. It's oddly crashy, thogh. Ars Technica will crash it about one time out of three.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Dont care for Chrome and its data slurping so its Firefox + NoScript FTW for me. I cant see a reason to change, the combo does everything I want from a browser and allows me a lot of control ( for example, FB scripts are ALWAYS blocked on any site I visit)

    1. PerlyKing
      Boffin

      uMatrix

      If you like NoScript, try uMatrix: complete control over scripts from all sources. It sometimes takes a few tries to find the minimal set to make a site functional, but it's instructive to see how many different sources some web pages want to load! Also available for Chrome.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Give Slimjet a try

      www.slimjet.com

      Chrome minus the snooping + additional privacy controls.

  9. 2460 Something

    Faster

    I haven't found this to be the case. I used to exclusively use FF, but I started using vivaldi and chromium instead as FF always seemed to be quite slow and quickly starts using excessive amounts of memory.

    1. kcblo

      Re: Faster

      Use Firefox Nightly, you will realize what faster means.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like