back to article Tech industry thumps Trump's rump over decision to leave Paris climate agreement

United States President Donald Trump's decision to walk away from the Paris climate change agreement has been met by a chorus of disgruntlement from the technology industry. Elon Musk has followed through on his threat to consciously uncouple from the Presidential councils on which he serves and Apple CEO Tim Cook has declared …

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I don't know why they're worried...

      They are worried because the tech Titans were hoping for lots of red tape and regulation - the kind that they can easily absorb but are a lead weight to start ups and the nimble, small companies that they fear.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I don't know why they're worried...

      "There will be some hot air, "

      yes, and getting warmer.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I don't know why they're worried...

      Just saying that the US will withdraw from the Paris agreements is just words. It will be when the US starts to loosen regulation on the power, transport, and manufacturing industries that the trouble starts. These are the big carbon energy users and loosening regulation will reduce their costs. "Banning US exports" is very unlikely to happen but placing those exports outside of free trade agreements because Trump has awarded them an unfair competitive advantage is much more likely. And its not just the money from import/export tariffs that will hurt. The added bureaucracy that comes with identify what part and how much of a product or service is subject to a new tariff will add cost and delay.

      When the EU treats the USA as its does China will be when the effects of Trump's ideas and actions will be fully understood

  1. Francis Boyle Silver badge

    We live in truly strange times

    when I agree with Apple, Microsoft and enen Facebook.

  2. Sweeping Brush
    Paris Hilton

    Not the first.

    Trump - Not the first to pull out of Paris early and certainly not the last.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Not the first.

      I look forward to the money shot.

      1. handle

        Re: Not the first.

        I don't.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not as bad as it appears

    It looks like Trump pulled out in a half-hearted way to placate his base, but the timeline for pulling out that extends until the day after the next election seems to indicate his daughter was more successful in talking him out of it than Rush and his other cronies would have liked. If he was really pulling out of Paris, it would have been effective immediately, not 3 1/2 years from now.

    Since compliance is voluntary he could have stayed in it, but not taken any measures to actually go along with it, so leaving it is more symbolic than meaningful. He was going to loosen restrictions on use of coal etc. regardless of Paris, because it doesn't impose any binding terms to prevent that. So if he stayed in it, people might have been happy, but it wouldn't have changed anything.

    If he wasn't under increasing pressure from the investigations about his Russian ties, I think he might have decided differently. Keeping his base happy is more important than ever - they are the only thing keeping a lot of congressmen fearful about speaking out against him. If the base turned against him, that fear would go away.

    It is ironic that he thinks doing this is showing America's independence, but really to the rest of the world it looks like America is relinquishing its leadership role and decreasing America's prestige and importance.

    1. Fading
      Paris Hilton

      Re: Not as bad as it appears

      The staying in required transfer of rather sizable lumps of cash to the "green fund" named more to do with the dollars accumulated than for any real environmental benefit. Have a read of the Paris accords - it does nothing for the climate but a lot for wealth distribution.

      1. James 51

        Re: Not as bad as it appears

        That is paying other countries to not polute the way the US is and buyer geener techology which they are going to buy from the EU and China. The US is make weaker and poorer by this withdrawal.

    2. Charlie Clark Silver badge

      Re: Not as bad as it appears

      I'm inclined to agree with you that this was mainly a carefully orchestrated media circus to please the base and deflect attention from the investigations about collusion with Russia for a couple of days. The decision is easily reversible at some point in the the future. The Trump chumps will cheer for a bit until they realise that they're jobs aren't coming back: shale gas has done more to destroy the coal industry than renewables ever could, and in the sunbelt solar is pretty much unbeatable. And US companies will continue to develop for the Californian market (because it's so big) and compete in the global one.

      But there is collateral damage: Trump's rudeness to the EU did not go down well at all and means that the US will have less influence on trade going forward. Inevitably this will also lead to less business investment in cleaner energy in the US than would have otherwise been the case and the export market may well become choosier: if the US thinks that polluting as much as China is a good thing then we might as well buy Chinese if it's cheaper.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Not as bad as it appears

        Trump's rudeness to the EU did not go down well at all

        So, something positive in all this then? More people should be rude to the EU politicos, it might help limit their God complex.

        1. HausWolf

          Re: Not as bad as it appears

          The orange guy with his own god complex has nukes though, try not to encourage the clown to do more stupid things.

    3. Tom 38

      Re: Not as bad as it appears

      It looks like Trump pulled out in a half-hearted way to placate his base, but the timeline for pulling out that extends until the day after the next election seems to indicate his daughter was more successful in talking him out of it than Rush and his other cronies would have liked. If he was really pulling out of Paris, it would have been effective immediately, not 3 1/2 years from now.

      Nice thing about agreements, people have to go along with what was agreed with, or people won't bother going along with the other things they've agreed on.

      The Paris agreement, amongst other things, put in place a policy for people who want to leave the agreement. They cannot do it at all within the first three years of the agreement, and it takes a year from giving notice to leave before you have actually left. He has actually left at the earliest possible moment.

      1. SundogUK Silver badge

        Re: Not as bad as it appears

        "The Paris agreement, amongst other things, put in place a policy for people who want to leave the agreement. They cannot do it at all within the first three years of the agreement, and it takes a year from giving notice to leave before you have actually left. He has actually left at the earliest possible moment."

        Irrelevant. The US never ratified the treaty. Trump is simply saying he never will.

        1. Tom 38

          Re: Not as bad as it appears

          Irrelevant. The US never ratified the treaty. Trump is simply saying he never will.

          So why did he pick, to the day, the first day that he could cancel it under the agreement?

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Not as bad as it appears

            The day after the US elections in 2020 is the first day it was possible for the US to cancel under the terms of the agreement? If so, kudos to the Obama team for sticking a little poison pill in there to prevent a republican administration (though I'm sure they never imaged it would be Trump when the terms were negotiated) from pulling out without giving a chance for the democrats to take back the white house in 2020 first.

      2. Robert 22

        Re: Not as bad as it appears

        Perhaps, but I don't think someone like Trump worries much about legal niceties.

  4. Naselus

    Tiny bit self-serving

    I'm no fan of Trump, I'm well aware that climate change is a real thing, and this particular move is a disaster for the planet in generl and the US in particular. But let's not ignore just how patently self-serving the tech giants are being here.

    They weren't bothered about dropping net neutrality. They didn't care about the Muslim ban. They merrily ignored the unending conflicts of interest, and had no protest about the Russia Thing. They raised no concerns over a budget which hacks away at every area of state spending aside from the military, and supported an education secretary who appears to know nothing about education and an energy secretary who's only qualification for the job is a BA in animal husbandry. They have no problems with a health care act which strips away insurance from 23 million Americans, and they're not even protesting over the idiotic Great Wall. In all these things, there was nothing but silence from Elon Musk.

    Yet suddenly, when the US drops out of a deal that would require the Federal Government to move heavily into renewable energy collection and storage systems, the guy who coincidentally happens to make renewable energy collection and storage systems cannot in good conscience continue to work with Trump. Huh. Weird how the straw that broke the camel's back also just happened to be the one which the camel has major investments in, rather than the various lurches into authoritarianism and incompetence.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Tiny bit self-serving

      Yes, Musk's timing was pretty transparent here.

    2. strum

      Re: Tiny bit self-serving

      >They weren't bothered about

      I think you'll find that the tech companies expressed disagreement with most of the policies listed in that paragraph.

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

    Perhaps Cook would like to explain how much pollution the factories that spew out his shiny products have generated? Perhaps Musk would like to explain where the power comes from for his electric cars, and how much pollution that causes? And Space X - that just spews out water vapour?

    I'm getting very fed up about the virtue signalling and posturing of left wing billionaire CEOs with their endless travel (pollution), smothering the planet with crap we don't need (phones are now deemed disposable items - pollution). The Paris climate agreement was about as useful and cost about as much to run as Paris Hilton. Just another excuse for hypocritical rich old men to fly first class, spend our taxes and tell the rest of us how to live. Imagine what we could do if they all paid their taxes?

    Trump did the right thing. Musk, Cook, et al. should STFU and be thankful we still buy their pointless and environment-destroying products. If I was Trump, I'd tax these arrogant old fools until they shut up.

    Oh yes - and to the next person who does the obligatory XKCD link comment. You're not clever, you're not funny. Why the f**k should I listen to a grown man who makes a living drawing stick men? Infantilisation at its best. Grow up.

    1. Rich 11

      Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

      left wing billionaire CEOs

      Is there such a beast?

      1. hnwombat

        Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

        > Is there such a beast?

        George Soros. And, compared to the repuglicants now running things, even Warren Buffet is left-wing.

        1. SouthernLogic

          Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

          Add to the left wing billionaires

          Bill Gates

          Mark Zukerberg

          Teresa Hienz Kerry

          Rockefellers

          Jeff Bezos

    2. GruntyMcPugh Silver badge

      Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

      "Virtue Signalling" new speak for someone calling you out on being an asshole?

      1. CrazyOldCatMan Silver badge
        Thumb Down

        Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

        "Virtue Signalling" new speak for someone calling you out on being an asshole?

        No - it's the NewSpeak for "I can't argue against the stand that you are taking because it would show what a psycopath I am, so I'm going to denigrate it by suggesting that you are only taking that position to demonstrate how cool/liberal/socialist/caring[1] you are"

        [1] Delete as appropriate.

    3. handle

      XKCD

      @AC: "Why the f**k should I listen to a grown man who makes a living drawing stick men?"

      If that's the only rebuttal you can muster, you truly have lost the argument.

    4. strum

      Re: Virtue Signalling - give it a rest

      >Perhaps Cook would like to explain

      Whataboutism - the last refuge of a lost argument.

  6. Van

    Suddenly more people care about the environment because they hate Trump. Result.

    Now let's have the London mayor grow balls as big as the Paris mayor's (she's female) and sort out the pollution in London (both air and noise)

  7. GruntyMcPugh Silver badge

    So, is IBM going to branch out into running coal mines? Rometty appears to like deep dark holes,.... she's crawled up Trump's already.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    I would trust Trump over Zuckerberg all day long

    This ^.

    1. CrazyOldCatMan Silver badge

      Re: I would trust Trump over Zuckerberg all day long

      Maybe the key is not trusting either..

  9. Jim 59

    Trump is wrong to pull out of the Paris agreement, it is a misjudgement. But hit attitude is right. He sticks up for the "common man". The American media (WaPo, CNN, NYT) certainly won't. And meanwhile the billionaires weep, while flying round in private jets and piutting down a personal carbon footprint the size of Neptne (as does Trump, probably).

    But yeah he should have stayed in.

    1. HausWolf

      If you think 45 sticks up for the common man, you haven't been paying attention.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      He didn't go far enough. He should have pulled the US out of the UNFCCC, that would have killed the Paris Agreement leaving requirements dead. It would also have killed the scam of calling an essential plant food a pollutant and forcing normal people to pay for it ('green' taxes to stop the very thing that makes the world green).

    3. mistwire

      He sticks up for the "common man"?

      http://fortune.com/2016/09/30/donald-trump-stiff-contractors/

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Microsoft

    Funny this guy's of Microsoft,

    to lecture other ... better start with themselves as one of the biggest energy consumers with they datacenters for Azure ..

    If you see how much more energy you need to let there software run in a user friendly way "qua speed " due the engineering paths they have chosen or inefficiently implemented ...

    If you see what energy consumption difference there is between a small NAS as Synolgy with Linux OS vs a same equivalent in Windows ... How many services need to run in the background for nothing ..

    Or just the way they artificially pump up the hardware spec to run there new windows version and so pushing the user to buy more NEW stuff instead of reusing there old PC ...

    How big is the waste footprint they did created due NOT supporting any longer the old windows mobile ?

    How much energy does the teledata they mandatory upload from windows 10, xbox etc to there home servers consume over the internet ...

    Just saying it's a lot marketing from these big corporations and there ceo's who are travelling around the world in big privet super dubber luxury jets ... It's so bon-ton to be a Green Bishop and lecturing how we the people have to live

    but uuuuu don't look how they life because this is sacrilegious...

    All the same as in the middle ages on this regard

    1. GruntyMcPugh Silver badge

      Re: Microsoft

      "one of the biggest energy consumers with they datacenters for Azure "

      Except there's a massive economy of scale using cloud providers. Virtualisation means processors are used more efficiently, resources are allocated on demand, rather than having hundreds of physical servers on prem running all the time at low utilisation.

      1. puckwudgie

        Re: Microsoft

        Have an upvote. This is similar to why mass transit is more green than every one driving their own car to work.

  11. PhilipN Silver badge

    Topsoil

    I am more worried about the above than climate change, partly because I do not know whether it has been studied enough.

    In theory it ought to take a lot less time to scrub up the atmosphere than it does to accumulate topsoil, which counts as a finite resource because it takes decades or even centuries. And there is a lot less to go around in the first place.

    Who knows - maybe global warming will free up lots and lots of lovely topsoil from the tundra and the taiga?

    1. Paul Kinsler

      Re: Topsoil

      If it's any use to you, I just did a search on for Web of Science:

      Results: 892

      You searched for: TOPIC: (topsoil) AND TOPIC: (climate)

      Not a colossal number of hits, but at least it's not completely neglected. And perhaps other keywords would be more research-appropriate, and get more hits.

      1. PhilipN Silver badge

        Re: Topsoil

        Ta!

    2. Robert 22

      Re: Topsoil

      I have some familiarity with the Canadian Shield which makes up a significant part of the area you are referring to. The description given below and quoted from Wikipedia is a reasonably accurate summary:

      "The current surface expression of the Shield is one of very thin soil lying on top of the bedrock, with many bare outcrops. This arrangement was caused by severe glaciation during the ice age, which covered the Shield and scraped the rock clean.

      The lowlands of the Canadian Shield have a very dense soil that is not suitable for forestation; it also contains many marshes and bogs (muskegs). The rest of the region has coarse soil that does not retain moisture well and is frozen with permafrost throughout the year. Forests are not as dense in the north."

      This area isn't going to become an agricultural powerhouse anytime soon given any reasonable assumptions.

    3. strum

      Re: Topsoil

      One of the proposed carbon capture methods is the creation of 'biochar' - a charcoal-like product of heating organic matter. One of its benefits is that it bulks up and enriches topsoil.

  12. smartypants

    You are being unkind to Trump

    Trump isn't a details man. If you can't present something in the space of a 10 second Fox News fake-fact-blurp, then it isn't going to get into his brain. He's a busy man! It isn't that his brain is small, but 95% of its capability is taken up with trying to add further gold plate to his immediate surroundings, family, and sense of self, so everything else just has to squeeze into what is left of the day.

    It isn't that Trump doesn't believe in climate change. He just isn't capable of sitting and listening long enough to get to the end of the sentence which explains why it is real and why he should care. Half way though, he'll just start fiddling with his phone and issuing another covfefe. Take that swipe at Germany on his hilarious trip to Nato. Trump thought those horrible German cars cluttering up proud US cities are BAD!

    Along comes a long-suffering advisor: "But Mr. President, BMWs in the US are made by Amer...." [CLICK! your connection with POTUS has ended at this time. Please try again later].

    So really, it is just the case that he promised the rednecks to do this, and it would be bad if he didn't now. Those other reasons for reconsidering... Well he tried bigly to listen but, look he doesn't have time, right?

    1. Fatman

      Re: You are being unkind to Trump

      You are on the right track, but for the wrong reason.

      Trump has the mental capacity of a five year old who throws a hissy fit when he can not get his way, nothing else.

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Worrying about climate change is similar to the crew rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic after it struck the iceberg. The planet is populated by 7+ billion people. IMNSHO this is the real problem. There is a correlation between loss of habitat and specie extinction after we went over 2.6 billion people. Notice I say correlation and not cause and effect. The Paris agreement was a facade so the establishment could feel good about itself without actually doing anything.

  14. This post has been deleted by its author

  15. mistwire

    I'm so sorry

    I voted against him.

    I canvassed against him.

    District gerrymandering, lack of term limits & "party uber alles" got us to this point; where a greedy, entitled, narcissistic, racist, sexist, small-minded, shallow, populist moron can win and then get propped up by his party at the expense of, literally, the world.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like