back to article Airbag bug forces GM to recall 4.3m vehicles – but eh, how about those self-driving cars, huh?

General Motors (GM) says a software bug has left as many as 4.3 million of its cars and trucks with potentially defective airbags. The US auto giant said that problems with the embedded software in the vehicles can cause the front airbags to fail to deploy in a crash. The bug resides in the software used to control the sensors …

Page:

  1. Dan 55 Silver badge
    Devil

    "certain driving conditions may cause the airbag SDM software to activate a diagnostic test"

    Oh, that'll be driving straight ahead at the exact speed used in the EPA tests then.

    But, hey, at least it improves fuel economy while you crash.

  2. herman

    Cock-up

    What a cock-up. Maybe they should order their airbags from Bulgaria.

  3. Crazy Operations Guy

    At least the software failure reaulted in the better of two options

    If the air-bag software were to crash at least it resulted in "front airbags fail to deploy in a crash" than 'Front airbags deploy successfully during normal operation', like some vehicles have experienced.

    Although airbags are fairly pointless since they save you from things that could be mitigated in other ways. Things like more intelligent seat-belts that allow some forward movement forward would prevent heads from arcing downward and causing the head to collide with the vehicle; Changing the way the steer wheel works would also go a long way to saving lives, after all, during a collision it is nothing more than a heavy wrought iron spear that happens to be pointed right at the drivers heart and is held in place by the steel frame of the vehicle.

  4. Mark 85

    I'm still have mixed feelings on the airbags...

    But I learned to drive when all that was available were lap belts and they were optional. Shoulder belts were a big improvement. Airbags... I think tend to give a false sense of security so some people don't bother with the belts and in many ways, that sense of security leads to inattentiveness.

    I've had a couple of bad accidents pre-airbag and because of the belts, I walked away from them. No nasty fumes in the lungs, no rapid deployment, and in one case, the car took two hits with the second being well after any airbags would have been deployed.

    I've had friends that the airbags did their thing and saved them (along with the belts) and others that had many complications from the bags even though they were using belts. I do have to wonder if the added complexity and mis-application of the deployment makes them worth it. Sometimes, the simple solution is the best.

    Bottom line... I'm still not sure about these things. They're obviously good for certain accidents and not so good for others. Properly adjust belts are always good, IMO.

  5. RobThBay

    What about an OTA update??

    Do the owners of these vehicles actually have to take their vehicles to a garage to have the software update installed?

    Can't they do an Over The Air update via wifi like some other vehicles are able to do?

    Maybe GM needs to talk to the folks at QNX.

    1. JeffyPoooh
      Pint

      Re: What about an OTA update??

      "...Over The Air update via ***wifi***..."

      I think that you spelled 'cellular data network' incorrectly.

      Do any cars attempt to rely on wifi?

      1. hplasm
        Coat

        Re: What about an OTA update??

        "Do any cars attempt to rely on wifi?"

        Er, Google street view?

        *goes darknet*

      2. Stoneshop
        Pirate

        Re: What about an OTA update??

        Do any cars attempt to rely on wifi?

        If that would mean "the car owner's residential WiFi", so that it can only apply patches, get the brakes applied remotely, etc., only when at rest in the owner's garage, I'm all for it.

    2. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

      Re: What about an OTA update??

      "Can't they do an Over The Air update"...?

      Only if they have a bumper sticker that says, "Hack me!"

  6. dshan

    Screwed Either Way

    So we have a choice - airbags that may kill or injure us when they deploy or airbags that don't deploy at all. Great.

  7. David Roberts

    I'd be more concerned

    that the seat belt didn't deploy either.

    This is likely to be far more serious than an airbag not deploying.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    I'm old enough to remember

    Cars with:

    - No seat belts, front or rear

    - Drum brakes, without power boosters

    - Pre radial tyres

    - Non-collapsible steering wheels

    - Hard, metal, dashboards

    - No way to deflect the engine down under the cab in a head-on

    - Big stabby-shaped metal steering wheel designs

    - Passenger killing 'crumple-zones'

    1. Lindsay T

      Re: I'm old enough to remember

      The hard metal dashboards also often had sharp chromium badges on them, which is why I have a scar under my chin that reads "caidoZ".

  9. 2Fat2Bald

    Compare and Contrast with VW....

    VW Passat, arguably, makes more carbon than VW claimed it would (When everyone know the claims were rubbish, anyway). No injuries, illness or real-world harm in evidence at all.

    "Outraged" owners, politicians and journalist describe how VW could possibly do such a egregious thing as lying about something that - arguably - barely matters. Massive, massive, disproportionate "compensation" claimed and awarded by federal government, news media dipping on and on about it for months. VW ordered to refund cars in full, despite the mileage, criminal charges filed in federal courts...

    GM Cars. Definitely dangerous, lead to at least one confirmed death, probably more, vital safety equipment not working........ drop them an email about it, and move on. If they don't respond, it's their stupid fault for buying a GM product and expecting it to not kill them....

    NB: one is European. One is not only American, but also partially owned by the federal government.

  10. AndrewDu

    Question - why does something so fundamentally safety-critical as an airbag even have ANY electronics in its operation at all?

    Have we completely lost sight of the need to make things simple?

  11. Greg C
    Stop

    No, no, no. "Voluntary recall"

    Simply means that GM agreed to recall the cars without further NHTSA action. Doesn't imply that the recall isn't necessary or that they won't make contact and best effort for every car get the fix.

    http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/recallprocess.cfm

    Might be slightly encouraging that the "new GM" isn't trying to cover this up for the next ten years.

  12. PassiveSmoking

    preceded by a specific event impacting vehicle dynamics

    What does that mean? Swerving? Braking hard? If you can't get your firmware updated soon should you just take your hands and feet off the controls in the event of an impending crash to ensure nothing affects the "vehicle dynamics"? What new horse poop is this?

  13. naive

    Car industry needs a FAA

    The amount of recalls in the last decade has been staggering, it is a sign that even the car manufacturers are not managing the complexity of systems installed in cars anymore.

    If driving automation ever will materialize in a world of rain, road salt, heat, dust, put holes, non OEM parts, and cars maintained by hobby mechanics, things should be organized like the FAA does. Material testing, checking of constructions and obligatory use of standard parts which are verified and tested. Perhaps TTIP could help in creating this, since it would apply to a huge market.

    Computers in cars are not bad, they are a blessing. One finds out after being bitten hard by cars with 80's-90's Bosch KE-Jetronic fuel injection having a few issues.

  14. DrM
    Thumb Up

    Headline

    Love the headline!

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon