This is just silly.
Redis does a Python, crushes 'offensive' master, slave code terms
The open-source Redis database, like the Python programming language, is moving away from using the technical terms "master" and "slave" in its documentation and API – to the extent that's possible without breaking things. For Python, the decision this week to replace the words "master" and "slave", prompted by undisclosed …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 09:48 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Those pesky SJWs virtue signalling
> Those pesky SJWs virtue signalling
> by not being publicly known..?
You can still virtue signal by being openly supportive of the idea, without admitting you were the impetus for the change. Those who "start it" usually get a lot of vitriol directed at them personally, which mere supporters generally avoid the worst of.
-
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 11:48 GMT Rich 2
Couldn't agree more - some people just have too much time on their hands
What next? Change the names of the colours black and white? It's ludicrous
And on a more general note, how exactly do you become "offended"? It's very in-vogue these days. I don't think I have ever been "offended" by anything? Ever. In fact, I'm not even sure what it means
-
Friday 14th September 2018 12:34 GMT Anonymous Coward
This comment section feels like an echo chamber, echo chamber, ...
Good to see all the people who don't have a reason to be offended by these terms not even attempting to put themselves in the place of those who do. If you think that some words aren't freighted with extra meaning, start using the 'n' word more. It just means black person.
-
Friday 14th September 2018 16:48 GMT JohnFen
"If you think that some words aren't freighted with extra meaning"
That's a red herring, since nobody thinks that.
If master/slave was being used in a way that was overtly offensive and damaging, that would be one thing. But, it's not. Sure, there are people who are offended by the words, but there is no "right to not be offended".
Changing language to avoid offending some people is a nice thing to do, but sometimes the costs of such a change are too high to be worth just being a bit nice to a small percentage of people. In which case, the correct thing to do is not make the change, and let some people be offended.
That said, I don't think (generally) this is a battle worth fighting on either side. The whole thing is just dumb beyond measure.
-
Friday 14th September 2018 18:00 GMT HieronymusBloggs
Context
"If you think that some words aren't freighted with extra meaning, start using the 'n' word more."
In software documentation? That would be very silly. The 'offensive' words referred to here are common technical terms. Would you suggest I remove the master and slave brake cylinders from my car in case they offend other road users?
-
Friday 14th September 2018 18:46 GMT bombastic bob
"start using the 'n' word more. It just means black person."
Uh, no. Direct racial epithets aren't the same thing as the use of the term 'master' and/or 'slave' with respect to one another in a technical context.
[but maybe you made a good point anyway, in a backwards kind of way - 'master' and 'slave' aren't racial epithets unless you WANT them to be, so that you can control other people's speech or something]
-
Friday 14th September 2018 21:10 GMT billdehaan
Actually, in the 1960s, the word "black" was considered offensive by many, and they demanded to be called niggers, instead. Seriously. And then in the 1970s, the word "nigger" was deemed offensive, and the new term was "African-Canadian" (or -American, as appopriate).
The reverse also occurs. The terms "gay" and "queer" were historically insults, until the gay community simply decided to start using the terms themselves, and the words lost the ability to insult.
There's a significant difference between using a word intentionally to insult, and being overly sensitive.
And then, there are things which go beyond parody. Previously, the exemplar for that was the O.J. Simpson case, where the term nigger was treated like it was a crucifix and the rest of the world was vampires, and to prove it, the news media interviewed a famous musician named Easy E. The problem is that Easy E was in a group called NWA, which stood for "Niggers With Attitude". So, you had someone who created a group with the word "nigger" in the title saying that the word was horrible and shocking and anyone who used it belonged in prison. By that logic, he couldn't even say his own band's name.
That was pretty much the tipping point for political correctness. Well, here were are, 23 years later, and it looks like the bar may be raised.
-
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 14:09 GMT Anonymous Coward
"This is just silly."
Sadly, I think it's more serious than just silly; it's neurotic, because they're looking for offense where none was intended and because they believe that a word should only mean what they think it should mean - a sort of neurotic pedantry.
Ultimately, words are just words; it's what people do that may be acceptable or, in the case of slavery, unacceptable.
What I find worrying about things like this is that decisions are being made on the basis of neurosis instead of rationality.
-
Sunday 16th September 2018 10:59 GMT P. Lee
>Sadly, I think it's more serious than just silly; it's neurotic
Not only neurotic, its plain wrong.
I absolutely do want a master/slave relationship in my code. If my slave code develops a penchant for doing its own thing and runs off to Canada, I'm in big trouble and the code will be... erased.
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 19:33 GMT Anonymous Coward
You are way, way too kind.
It is offensively stupid.
English vocabulary is packed with words that have more than one meaning.
Pandering to a few hyper-sensitive snowflakes by giving them exclusive control over the presumed meanings of words is an offence against the rights of the rest of the people who speak this language.
Time for the nonsense to end.
-
-
-
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 10:33 GMT magickmark
Re: They should ask Torvalds to rename git.
@Jake
"We should instead use "slide in" and "slide out"."
I find the above offensive due to the sexual connotations and the implied inference of male dominance over a female partner!!
Having said that I'm fucked as to what we would call it but then that's not my problem!!!
-
Friday 14th September 2018 18:52 GMT bombastic bob
Re: They should ask Torvalds to rename git.
"male dominance over a female partner!!"
yeah and with all of the BDSM references for master/slave LAST time around...
I still think Tori and Uke would get past the radar. They're Judo terms. Judo. 'Tori' literally means 'bird' and is the person doing the throw (also according to the web page from the verb 'toru' which has a meaning of take or pick up or choose - but if you've ever had a bird steal your food, it makes sense). 'Uke' means 'receiver' more or less and is the person being thrown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tori_(martial_arts)
any OTHER connotation, political or sexual, was (*cough*) accidental.
/me thinks "at least I didn't say 'tops' and 'bottoms' - no, wait..."
-
-
-
-
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 07:04 GMT Dazed and Confused
Re: No masters!
> Even if they rename it, the architecture itself is offensive. I will be boycotting the product until all offensive dominance roles have been removed therefrom.
I've been involved in IT training for most of the last 30 years and must admit that I came to find the terms master and slave as distasteful quite a long time ago, but they were the words that were generally used. There are other words commonly bandied about in the industry that perhaps don't sit well these days.
But when it comes to the actual architecture issue it's very often the slaves processes telling the master what to do. You often see the slaves asleep and the master busy and it's not unusual to find that masters actually do more work waking up the slaves than the slaves do when they've been woken up.
-
-
-
Saturday 15th September 2018 01:30 GMT onefang
Re: No masters!
"The only person I've got to know well into that sort thing, she, the sub, was definitely in charge and it was her masters job to keep her satisfied."
The sub has all the power really, coz the sub gives the gift of submission to the Dom, and the sub can take it away again. That's basically what a safe word is for, "Stop doing that nasty thing I previously gave you permission to do, and stop it right now.".
-
-
Thursday 13th September 2018 21:48 GMT cornetman
I'm always suspicious of "undisclosed complaints".
Some years ago, a colleague of mine, who was a golf club member, had a guy come up to him to complain about his attire. Instead of coming out and admitting that he was the one making the complaint, he made up some bullshit about "some of the other members have asked me to talk to you".
If you have something to say, and you can't stand by your speech on its own merits, perhaps it is better to stay silent.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Friday 14th September 2018 19:07 GMT bombastic bob
I'm always suspicious of "undisclosed complaints".
It's a form of passive-aggressive behavior, to pretend it's "others" then "bring it to your attention" like that...
'Passive-aggressive' is considered (by some at least) to be a psychological DISORDER. For most of us, it's just A PAIN IN THE ASS.
Ever had to work with a passive-aggressive who targets you? I have. Several times. No thanks. And getting them punished for it: impossible. All you can do is *QUIT* and say why on the way out the door...
-
-
Thursday 13th September 2018 21:48 GMT EveryTime
A silly issue, distracting from real work
I don't think that anyone is directly offended by the words. Actual slavery was abolished in U.S. about 8 generations ago.
Instead they are being pseudo-offended on behalf of theorized other people.
Even while rolling my eyes, I wouldn't have a problem with getting rid of the terms if there were equivalent replacements. But in some contexts they are the simplest, clearest terms to use.
No doubt if we got rid of the terms, the replacements would end up with the same connotations and subsequently need to be replaced viz. the chain of euphemisms for bodily functions, each of which turns into a word not used in polite company a generation or two later.
-
-
Friday 14th September 2018 08:22 GMT Fursty Ferret
Re: A silly issue, distracting from real work
Unfortunately there is a generation of US students who do get offended. I write 'unfortunately' because unfortunately for them it is highly unlikely I would ever offer them a job.
I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing to feel uncomfortable about terminology, and someone doesn’t have to agree with your point of view to work for you. A refusal to change with the times should be far more of a red flag to these potential employees, and in general you only have to skim the headlines to see how far an antiquated attitude gets you in IT.
As someone who just turned 30 the whole master/slave terminology was tired years ago, and I don’t think I’ve ever used it in my own architecture, preferring “Primary” and “Secondary”, both of which can be easily abbreviated to single syllable words.
-
Friday 14th September 2018 13:01 GMT Jaybus
Re: A silly issue, distracting from real work
"As someone who just turned 30 the whole master/slave terminology was tired years ago, and I don’t think I’ve ever used it in my own architecture, preferring “Primary” and “Secondary”, both of which can be easily abbreviated to single syllable words."
Those words have completely different meaning. Most English speakers would expect the secondary to have a "backup" or "auxiliary" or "redundant" role. If we are randomly choosing words for replacement, then I choose "fu" and "bar", so instead of a master/slave relationship, we would have a fu/bar relationship.
-
-