How about no .africa
Regardless of exactly how corrupt ICANN was in this case, it is my opinion that the application for .africa should never have been approved. There are only two groups that should have the rights to .africa:
1. A body selected by a vote of all African countries (that's going to happen).
2. AFRINIC.
What logic did ICANN use to say that some company or even country should have the rights to a TLD oriented at a continent? That should belong to the continent involved.