https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks%27s_law
Who will fix our Internal Banking Mess? TSB hires IBM amid online banking woes
In the midst of its six-day online banking meltdown, which is showing no sign of letting up, TSB has hauled in the systems integration big gun or as it is otherwise known, IBM. The British bank confirmed the signing of Big Blue this morning as part of its rather uncomfortably timed first quarter financial results for 2018, in …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
-
Tuesday 22nd May 2018 12:21 GMT Tydfil
Re: Out of the Paella pan
IBM to the rescue!!!!! ...... now there's an 'oxymoron'. What with no more TSS for support, IBM could fix it on site with some highly skilled project staff and developers. But they won't be around to support it afterwards - and that is something IBM will want from all of this once fixed, and sufficient time has passed for TSB to draw breath.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:31 GMT HmmmYes
'But the damage has been done – vast numbers of Twitter users and numerous Reg readers have been reporting plans to switch banks (as soon as they can access their money again).'
Surely thats:
'But the damage has been done – vast numbers of Twitter users and numerous Reg readers have been reporting plans to switch banks (*IF* they can access their money again).'
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:56 GMT Peter2
'But the damage has been done – vast numbers of Twitter users and numerous Reg readers have been reporting plans to switch banks (as soon as they can access their money again).'
Why wait?
I signed up for a new account a couple of years ago. One of the questions they ask in the setup process was "would you like us to get your old account with the other bank closed down and the balance transferred to your new account with us?"
It turns out that most banks these days have teams that are dedicated to doing transitions between banks. In this situation, personally i'd be availing myself of their services so they can deal with the hassle.
-
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 11:50 GMT Ktsecful
So instead of filling in a simple form (and with many banks being paid to switch using the current account switching service), you'd rather:
Go in to a bank, withdraw all of your cash, close your account
Go to a new bank, open an account, pay your money in
Contact all businesses you have outstanding DDs with, and set up new ones.
Recreate all of your payees on your new banks online banking
Set up any standing orders again.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 12:35 GMT Dan 55
Yes, I would rather do that. I don't know if you've noticed but TSB's IT currently resembles a smoking crater and they've got no more chance transferring your money out of your account than you have getting the money or a bankers draft at a branch, plus by now TSB will have a huge backlog to work through.
DDs, SOs, and payees can be done online after getting the money in the new account, given an evening and a cup of tea.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 15:26 GMT Yet Another Anonymous coward
TSB's switchover team use the same back office systems as branch personnel and will probably be inundated.
So if you do it you get nowhere.
If another giant bank gets no response to a milllion transfer requests it phones up the banking regulator and suggests TSB get fined a few million/day until they comply.
I don't think - we would love to abide by the rules for the time it takes to transfer a customer to a competitor, but the computer is acting up - works as an excuse
-
Friday 27th April 2018 12:05 GMT Aodhhan
Yes, I'd rather do all of this. It's known as:
- Responsibility
- Being forward thinking
- Someone who isn't going to support poor business practices
- Taking care of my financial future and my family
- Oh, and this will strike at the heart of many snowflakes... NOT BEING LAZY.
Taking several hours out of my life to deal with switching banks will likely save me many days of headaches and late payment fees in the future.
Anyone who isn't willing to do this, only perpetuates poor business practices. Someday, this is likely going to bite you in the backside.
Finally... when all this is over, TSB is going to look for ways to cut costs to cover the large expense this muck-up is costing them. It doesn't take a world class seer to figure out how the effects will eventually fall back onto the customer.
-
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 15:13 GMT Anonymous Coward
Current Account Switching Service
I don't understand why the Current Account Switching Service which the UK Government exhorted the banks to implement was made literally only that, a switching service, and one which closes down your old bank account once the transfer has been fully completed.
Certainly, being able to transfer things such as salary payments in, and standing orders and direct debits out, from the old account to the new account as smoothly as possible is very welcome, but I think that all of the problems that various banks have had, coupled with the risk of card theft, all go to show the importance of having at least two current accounts (with completely separate banking groups) at all times, so that you always have a backup available ...even if one of the banks doesn't!
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 17:12 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Current Account Switching Service
> I don't understand why the Current Account Switching Service which the UK Government exhorted the banks to implement ...
Sounds like an absolutely fantastic Social Engineering opportunity.
"Hi this is <foo> calling from <some bank>. Just calling to switch another client over. Name: [ie: Jeremy Clarkson], Details: [found on social media]. Target bank sort code: [..]. Target bank account: [...]."
Wonder how employees from each bank are supposed to auth to employees from different banks, who they probably don't always know? Hopefully it's not something stupidly easy to fake.
-
-
-
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:32 GMT djstardust
A disaster
As a TSB customer of 33 years (It was Aberdeen Savings Bank when I signed up) I have finally decided to move on. Shame really as the local branch have good long term staff .... but the real issues are higher up the chain.
This is yet another example of outsourcing not delivering (Accenture) and another company using outsourced IT support rather than a professional, committed in-house team.
Good luck hiring IBM, because most of their decent people either got the Ruud Gullit or moved on somewhere else.
I have a real issue with outsourcing, especially when seing what's recently happened with Carillion and Crapita, and any company who I find willingly using it to save a quick buck (in the short term of course) will be losing my business.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:37 GMT Doctor Syntax
Re: A disaster
"Shame really as the local branch have good long term staff"
It was one of the staff of a local branch when it was part of Lloyds that prompted me to leave Lloyds although the damage had been done when Lloyds closed my preferred local branch. Just as well I did - maybe I'd have been transferred over to TSB when they split.
-
-
-
Friday 27th April 2018 08:11 GMT Dan 55
Re: A disaster
Sabadell bought the system off Accenture, but Accenture is involved in this migration as well as in-house staff. I guess Accenture sold that snake oil by claiming they still had the expertise but anyone who saw that system more than a decade ago has either left or is doing something else by now.
So what happened is Accenture got paid money to get rid of a piece of crap and still raking in the consultancy fees now for a failed migration.
-
-
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:38 GMT JimmyPage
promising that no one would be "left out of pocket".
but to what extent ?
When HSBC went titsup there were tales of house purchases which failed (HTF can you recompense that ????) plus business contracts which failed, and (presumably) bargains via eBay etc which were gone - forever.
Admittedly there haven't been any stories from that fuckup about custmers being left out of pocket. But I remain deeply cynical.
-
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:44 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: not a customer
"sounds like a complex undertaking done for good reasons. Customers should just be patient and not get agitated."
Sure, they're doing it for the right reasons, but it seems to have been a monumental cockup.
Nationwide did the same thing a few years back with a much higher level of success. I wonder how much outsourcing, offshoring and asset stripping they've had over the same period compared to the for profit big boys?
If you couldn't get access to your money, pay bills, etc, you'd quite rightly be "agitated". Not even the branch staff can help as their system is completely fluffed too (the BBC report quotes a manager, who says their system even helpfully has all the error messages in Spanish!)
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:47 GMT gv
Re: not a customer
On the contrary, customers should get very agitated. This is a core banking platform migration, so there should have been extensive contingency planning, testing and a fallback system in place.
"to help identify and resolve performance issues in the platform"
A good rule of thumb is to do this BEFORE going live.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 10:49 GMT Doctor Syntax
Re: not a customer
sounds like a complex undertaking done badly for good reasons.
FTFY
I'm not a customer either - I escaped that fate. If I were I'd certainly be agitated.
There's an old saying, "if you fail to plan you plan to fail". What does the present situation tell you about their plans?
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 11:01 GMT colinb
Re: not a customer
They are not a ffing corner shop.
If a Bank can't be trusted to handle your money responsibly it can cause things like bank runs. Bank runs can be contagious.
RBS was fined £56 million for a botched IT upgrade, so no the regulator doesn't like to chill either when avoidable crap happens.
-
Thursday 26th April 2018 13:12 GMT defiler
Re: not a customer
Customers should just be patient and not get agitated.
Day 1, I agree completely. Day 6, we're running headlong into the end of the month.
Missed direct debits is one thing (I'll have a few between now and Monday, and I'd be miffed if they failed), but the bank can generally explain the problem to the recipient, handle the penalties etc. But what if I (not banking with TSB) were unable to get paid by my employer (hypothetically banking with TSB), and I am the one stung with penalties? Will TSB reimburse me?
Yes, it's a complex task. It's a huge task. And it needs huge planning, and regular checkpoints with back-out plans already in place. It seems that somebody skimped on the planning, and they committed to a course of action that didn't have a back-out plan ready to go.
I'm not saying I'm perfect. I've committed to system changes without a fast back-out that ended up biting me before, but we had a workaround already on the back burner before it happened, and were able to keep users running on that for the couple of weeks it took the devs to sort the latency issues with us. But this is beyond amateur hour. It's a bank. Not a small bank. They claim to have over 5 million customers. That means that a small disruption is a big issue.
-