back to article Sysadmin’s worst client was … his mother! Until his sister called for help

Welcome again to On-Call, The Register’s reader-contributed tales of tech support tension, terror and technical tragedy. This week meet “Calvin” who told us that “For many years our small family business had run on paperwork, but increasing amounts of government red tape meant we had to go digital.” “After sharpening my …

Page:

  1. m0rt

    "“The first task, that took about two years, was to stop her saving everything to the root of C:/.” "

    Isn't that root of C:\?

    1. lglethal Silver badge
      Trollface

      No its C:\'s evil brother...

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        "No its C:\'s evil brother"

        No, C:\ is /'s evil brother.

        1. Chris King

          Okay, which one's wearing the dark glasses and sporting a goatee (or a "Hulk Hogan") ?

          THAT's the evil twin.

        2. The Oncoming Scorn Silver badge
          Coat

          Isn't that the root of all evil?

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Isn't the "root" bit superfluous as C:\ is the root.

      1. jake Silver badge

        Well, to be honest, C:\ is the root of the C: drive ...

      2. m0rt

        Depends.

        If I am speaking and saying 'Go to the root of your C:\ drive." the ':\' is silent.

        1. jake Silver badge

          Or, to put it another way, there is no such thing as \ sans modifier.

    3. Dr.Sommer

      its a folder named "C:"

      So evil ;-)

      He really could give her the hint that

      ls -la ~

      would have showed her the documents. :-)

      1. Aladdin Sane

        I thought C ran MI6?

        1. TRT Silver badge

          Shanty...

          A sailor went to C++.

        2. PNGuinn
          IT Angle

          I thought C ran MI6?

          No, he runs El Reg.

    4. Alan Brown Silver badge

      On a more serious note, on a dos fs once you exceed 512 files in the root directory, the chances of catastrophic loss start skyrocketing.

      1. John Smith 19 Gold badge
        Unhappy

        "On a more serious note, on a dos fs once you exceed 512 files in the root directory,

        the chances of catastrophic loss start skyrocketing."

        Old school.

        But sadly true.

        But surely that has been fixed in Windows 7/8/10 already?

        1. Rich 11

          Re: "On a more serious note, on a dos fs once you exceed 512 files in the root directory,

          But surely that has been fixed in Windows 7/8/10 already?

          Let me just test that.

          (If you don't see a second comment from me here, you'll know it's not been fixed.)

      2. Steve the Cynic

        On a more serious note, on a dos fs once you exceed 512 files in the root directory, the chances of catastrophic loss start skyrocketing.

        It's more complicated than that.

        On a FAT-12 or FAT-16 hard disk partition, the root directory has a specific maximum size, and that size is (wait for it) 512 entries (including the ones uses to store the UCS-2/UTF-16 "long name" characters if there are any).

        On a FAT-32 partition, the root directory is, in effect, just like all the others (as it is in a UNIXish filesystem), and does not have a fixed limit.

    5. J. R. Hartley

      From an Amiga 1200 to a Win95 box? That's one hell of a step backwards.

  2. Dave K

    Ahh, parents

    My mum wasn't especially computer literate either, but as a primary school teacher she increasingly started to use the PC at home for creating work sheets, reports and various other bits of work. Incredibly, she did manage to get the hang of selecting the "Sue" folder in "My Documents" when saving the files, but had a nasty habit of simply accepting the default filenames that Word suggests (ie, usually the first sentence of the document). She also did not get the hang of subfolders.

    Result, one single folder after a couple of years with about 400 documents in it, all called things like "Chapter 1.doc", "Chapter 1 (2).doc", "4+3=.doc", "Ben and Sarah went to the shops to.doc" etc. And then she wondered why it was difficult trying to find some earlier work she'd done so that she could modify and update it...

    1. hplasm
      Coat

      Re: Ahh, parents

      "...the "Sue" folder in "My Documents" "

      Is she a lawyer too?

      1. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

        Re: Ahh, parents

        Sue, Grabbit and Run?

    2. This post has been deleted by its author

      1. Dave K

        Re: Dave

        If she couldn't figure out document naming, right clicking and looking at the modified date is going to be a stretch.

        Plus, can you remember what date you created a certain set of worksheets last year? Helps to narrow things down a bit I grant you, but still hardly a perfect solution!

        1. frank ly

          Re: Dave

          A conversation from about 20 years ago, when we got our first computer in the 'product development' department:

          Colleague: What shall I name the file as?

          Me: redgiraffe17

          Colleague: That's a stupid name!

          Me: Can you think of a better name?

          Colleague: (long silence)

          Colleague: How about 'specification.doc'?

          Me: That might cause problems later.

    3. Bob Wheeler
      Unhappy

      and also Ahh sub folders Re: Ahh, parents

      Sub Folders are a double edged sword.

      I've seen too many examples of 30 or even 40 levels of sub folders and each folder name and different variation of the folder above

      reports/annual reports/2017 reports/hr reports/finance/2017/directors reports/finial reports/ etc etc etc

      1. CrazyOldCatMan Silver badge

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        directors reports/finial reports/

        Do they have pilaster reports too?

        1. agurney

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          "directors reports/finial reports/

          Do they have pilaster reports too?"

          Of course, spreadsheets are full of columns.

      2. JimboSmith Silver badge

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        Oh I spent a while working out why a program had ceased to work with some files at an employers. Nothing had apparently changed but the damn thing did not like the files anymore. Other files worked fine and it was bizarre that just these ones were causing it to throw a hissy fit. Someone then pointed out that they'd added a few sub folders and moved the files there the day before. The program couldn't cope with that many subfolders and just had given up.

        1. Daveytay

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          Having to use the subst command, good times...

      3. ridley

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        I've seen so many sub folders it became impossible to save anything with a meaningful name without hitting the 256 character limit.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          Google Drive on Windows chokes on this all the fscking time. Even with the long path registry hack. If you have a gdrives synced to your PC and try and open a file in some moderately nested folders from the Explorer, it claims the file doesn't exist.

          It's got so bad I've started using SharePoint. Reg readers know that to make that decision means I am at DEFCON 5...

          1. kain preacher

            Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

            if you are using share point I suggest you see a a shrink. TGhat's the same as giving an over worked, suicidal person a a load gun.

          2. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

            Re: DEFCON

            DEFCON5 = like, totally chilled out (lowest state of readiness)

            DEFCON

        2. LewisRage

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          Just set them up with a mapping at the end of the folder structure and then they can add another 255 characters to that.

      4. kain preacher

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        I saw the sub folders issue on early macs. Iv'e seen rare cases it crash the unit.

      5. The Oncoming Scorn Silver badge
        FAIL

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        Had a user with nested subfolders containing archives of the previous years, nested with the same archives saved once again further down.

        Or the Legal executive with every contract that this large oil & gas company were working on, stored on her desktop in folders. There was little to no real estate available on her desktop.

        1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          "There was little to no real estate available on her desktop."

          Conveyancing is a different department.

          I know the feeling. When the files get half-way across it's time for a tidy/clear-out. I'm just about there now.

          1. 404

            Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

            -"There was little to no real estate available on her desktop."-

            Have a client that I've been warning that if I go into some kind of seizure due to all the files on her desktop, I'm suing... this was a while back, recently I noted she only had one more space on the grid for docs.

            Suggested one of those big curved widescreens to increase storage space... I'm just tired of talking, you know?

        2. Lilolefrostback

          Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

          "Or the Legal executive with every contract that this large oil & gas company were working on, stored on her desktop in folders. There was little to no real estate available on her desktop."

          Surely you got her a second screen, thereby solving the problem?

      6. LewisRage

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        I used to support an environment that had, amongst other astonishing stuff, a folder structure that looked something like this

        Operations\NOC\

        Operations\NOC\NOC OLC\NOC NEW DO NOT USE\NOC\

        Operations\NOC 2012\

        Guess which was 'live'

        I also made the mistake of mapping a drive for end users that already had a 40 char folder name, so where they saw U:\ the server saw \\server\share\some folder name\some other folder name\accounts

        The users then built out a folder structure that used the full 255 char limit from where they were mapping too. Of course when it came for me to do any work on that server I'd hit this huge chunk of files that windows was no longer able to deal with thanks to the fact the file names were too long.

      7. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: and also Ahh sub folders Ahh, parents

        I know a company who's web root is something like /usr/local/www/data/www.company.co.uk/www.oldname.co.uk/www/site.company.co.uk

        (where oldname is the company's name from about ten years ago)

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Ahh teachers

      Are you one of my stepdaughters? You've just described my wife's behavior perfectly.

      for the rest of you If you don't understand why AC then you are not married to a teacher

    5. GtBFilms

      Re: Ahh, parents

      I've seen worse in a professional situation - we delivered a suite of reports to a Banking client once and were called in again 2 months later to offer support. The original reports were there, but they'd added some new versions. They had decided the best way to differentiate these versions was to use a space at the end of the original report name.

      Hence about 60 reports named:

      'Monthly Transactions.rep'

      'Monthly Transactions .rep'

      'Monthly Transactions .rep'

      'Monthly Transactions .rep'

      "Which version's causing the trouble?"

      "Oh I think it's version 17, or it might be 21, hold on I'll count the spaces."

      1. Ivan Headache

        Re: Ahh, parents

        I've posted this once before - but it fits here perfectly.

        I got a call saying "I can't find the right page 2."

        Pop round and find a desktop full of 'Page 1s' and 'Page 2s'

        Turns out that she hadn't realised that when you reach the end of page 1 page 2 follows automatically.

        For several months she had been treating every page as a separate peice of paper.

        As some of the docs (all progress reports and assessments) were only 1 page in length, her filing went right up the shute when page 2-5 actually married up with Page 1-8. (Or was it Page 1-11?)

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Joke

    Have you tried turning it off and on again ?

    Have you tried sticking it up your arse ?

    Ooohhh.... I just realised that was my mother...

  4. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

    Not to add the mayhem ctrl+alt+up/down/left/right arrow would cause with a multi-monitor setup. Single monitor's bad enough, but multi... *shudder*

    Or holding ctrl down whilst scrolling up/down with the mouse's scroll button (or brushing by accident on the touchpad's scroll section)...

    1. Dave 126 Silver badge

      Rubbish touch pads on cheap laptops cause all sorts of strife and user confusion. Some parts of the unmarked pad result in scrolling, some selecting. In these cases, it is not the user's fault if they want to throw the machine out of the window.

      Thankfully, market demand is finally beginning to result in decent touchpads on laptops. There isn't always a mouse around.

      (And indeed I'm reluctant to lend out my carefully chosen mice since someone threw one against a wall - it's handy Forward / Back navigation buttons caused to lose a long rant he was writing on a forum.)

      1. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

        (And indeed I'm reluctant to lend out my carefully chosen mice since someone threw one against a wall - it's handy Forward / Back navigation buttons caused to lose a long rant he was writing on a forum.)

        Beautiful!

        Pity about the mouse though.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        "Some parts of the unmarked pad result in scrolling, some selecting."

        And incredibly, some (I'm pointing at you, HP. Well, jabbing you in the eye) have an area you can tap on to turn the whole touchpad off. So on a new machine where you can't rely on muscle memory to always tap in the middle, you end up disabling the thing. I've had to fix many, many of those "issues".

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: "Some parts of the unmarked pad result in scrolling, some selecting."

          Or the user disables it and then demands IT come down and fix it, despite me telling to double tap the little orange light. Too complicated apparently......

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like