wish they'd focus on power consumption in Android for their flagship phones... whatever else this elusive custom silicon does the only thing I care about is actually getting a phone that can survive a genuine day when I'm traveling, not need recharging every few hours. while I'm not a fan of iOS because of some of the restrictions/limitations (and clunky UX) I'll often find myself carrying my old testing iPhone SE in preference to my current Pixel to handle the battery anxiety issues!
Pixel 2 tinkerers force Google's hand: Secret custom silicon found
Previously Google has contracted major brand OEMs to produce Nexus and Pixel phones using fairly standard off-the-shelf parts. But a teardown of Google's pricey new flagship reveals the company's first homegrown system on a chip – and it's currently idle. Google yesterday went into a little detail on the chip, describing it as …
COMMENTS
-
-
Friday 20th October 2017 20:01 GMT Anonymous Coward
wish they'd focus on power consumption in Android for their flagship phones
I suspect that the reason they don't is because it would interfere with harvesting all your data in real time.. That's the only logical explanation in my mind for the much better battery life when you turn off mobile data.
-
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 11:18 GMT Anonymous Coward
@AC
Given that apple do the same harvesting
Your proof? Apple doesn't care about stealing all your personal information, because they make money off you when you buy the phone. Google gives Android away for free, as a way to push more eyeballs to the ads they sell. Totally different ways of making money, each very successful in their own way, but don't confuse the two.
Apple even shut down the ad network they ran (iAd) so if they did collect your personal information they literally don't have a way of making money off it - so what would be the point?
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 12:19 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: @AC
"Apple doesn't care about stealing all your personal information, because they make money off you when you buy the phone."
Awww, that's nice of them, they have the opportunity to make money both ends, but because they are nice guys, they device not to monetise you.
Sad thing is, you really believe this..
https://www.apple.com/uk/legal/privacy/en-ww/
"Collection and Use of Personal Information
Personal information is data that can be used to identify or contact a single person. You may be asked to provide your personal information anytime you are in contact with Apple or an Apple affiliated company. Apple and its affiliates may share this personal information with each other and use it consistent with this Privacy Policy. They may also combine it with other information to provide and improve our products, services, content, and advertising. "
oooh look, ADVERTISING, Apple and it's unamed AFFILIATES.....
-
-
-
Friday 20th October 2017 21:12 GMT goldcd
I'm a pixel v1 owner
WTF are you doing to your phone?
Mine is bullet-proof as a "take off charge when I wake up and sees me through to sleep phone"
Not been near IOS for years, so can't compare - but I do love my Pixel (XL if that's the issue) for it's very boring efficiency.
Sure there are a couple of features I'd like it to have - but it gains my respect for having no weak points.
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 07:27 GMT Anonymous Coward
My Xperia lasts nearly 2 days, so it's clearly nothing wrong with Android. Every phone is about balancing features and compromises. You are clearly being lured by some other phone property that affects battery, this is usually form factor..
My Xperia isn't the slimmest phone on the market, nor is it the fastest,. Buts it's long run time is best in class, and it's no slouch or fatty either.
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 09:41 GMT Anonymous Coward
My Xperia lasts nearly 2 days, so it's clearly nothing wrong with Android.
OK. If you don't need minute-by-minute connectivity, and purely for the purposes of experimentation, try running it for a few days with mobile data turned off, other than when you need to use it. And turn it off when you've finished. See how that changes things. If the majority of your battery drain is call time and screen, you won't see that much difference. But if you see a worthwhile increase in battery life, then chances are that the incremental usage with mobile data on is pure slurping (whether by Android or installed apps).
IME as a very light user, I get approaching double the battery life with mobile data left off. I'm not suggesting that modus operandi works for you, merely inviting you to try it for a couple of days and see whether my experience stacks up on your handset.
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 14:25 GMT Martin an gof
try running it for a few days with mobile data turned off
My old first gen Moto G (jailbroken, all social media apps expunged) will easily last 7 days with WiFi, mobile data, GPS and Bluetooth off. I have been known to get 10 days out of it, though that's getting more difficult now that it's ageing.
Turning mobile data on doesn't make a huge difference unless I start using it. It's noticeable that if I do a bit of web browsing with Opera, even when finished battery consumption is greater than it was before I loaded Opera. The same is true if I use WiFi instead. In order to return the thing reliably to power-sipping mode, I not only have to turn the radios off, but reboot the thing.
M.
-
Monday 23rd October 2017 09:28 GMT Dave 126
Turning off mobile data tends to make a difference to battery life if you are somewhere with a weak or patchy 3/4G signal. This was true with older Edge phones too, in the absence of any signal.
It is more to do with the phone using more power to get reception than it is data 'slurping'.
The Xperia phones last because their Stamina mode temporarily turns off data unless the screen is turned on - i.e you don't get email / WhatsApp etc notifications until you unlock your phone.
-
Monday 23rd October 2017 09:48 GMT Martin an gof
Turning off mobile data tends to make a difference to battery life if you are somewhere with a weak or patchy 3/4G signal
True, the 2G/3G/4G radio adapts its power output. That was part of my point, but the other part (that I didn't really expand) is that things like social media apps tend to cause the radios to wake up more often, or for longer.
On the other hand, is a smartphone still a smartphone if you turn off all the things that make it smart?
M.
-
Monday 23rd October 2017 15:58 GMT Anonymous Coward
On the other hand, is a smartphone still a smartphone if you turn off all the things that make it smart?
Yes. My Chromebook is s till a Chromebook available to me even when it is shut down, my PC, my car, my TV....they're all still the same thing with the same capabilities available when I choose to use them, even if turned off, or with functionality deliberately limited for some reason of my choosing.
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 23rd October 2017 14:46 GMT fuzzie
Sony does have some major battery-fu that they've added to manage batteries, e.g. various Stamina modes, Qnovo battery life extender tech, and predictive charging in the latest handsets. Google's attempts seem limited to Doze, which had undone some of Sony's work and is not quite as good as the Stamina modes. I suspect Google doesn't like handsets that go too quiet.
-
-
Monday 23rd October 2017 09:32 GMT juice
Why not...
just take a battery pack?
Personally/anecdotally, my S7 Edge comfortably lasts a full day, despite the fact that I use it as an ebook reader, VNC client, facebook time-waster, etc.
Things significantly improved with the most recent major update (Nougat), too - a lot of apps which were pointlessly sipping data in the background have been given a stiff talking to.
If your phone isn't lasting a full day, then either it's being hammered with call/data usage, or the battery is on it's way out!
-
-
-
Saturday 21st October 2017 11:26 GMT Charlie Clark
I agree with Andrew that we're unlikely to see Google suddenly becoming a major new chip designer and maker. This kind of development is fully in line with the shift from the x86-based industry standard architecture, which meant you got whatever Intel decided you should have. The ARM world is all about core + customisation.
Google will no doubt continue to focus chip development in the server area where this can bring competitive advantage. I can imagine this leading to codec and AI silicon designs for mobile, if these means better use of Google services: hardware support for VP9 means keeping licensing costs at zero and the AI play is self-evident. And, of course, to make things even more interesting: Google has a habit of open sourcing stuff it's developed but does not plan to exploit commercially. As with the codec stuff and back with map/reduce, making this stuff publicly available can help contain costs.