What do you expect
When you hire people who are just as greedy as you but smarter. Alas not smart enough to not get caught.
A banking IT expert orchestrated an insider-trading caper that raked in millions of dollars for him and his pals, it was claimed on Wednesday. Between August 2013 and April 2017, Daniel Rivas, 32, worked for an unnamed New York bank in its capital markets technology division. He was hired as a consultant for a new banking …
It has a lot more to do with how much you cheat the system by I think.
This guy could very likely have got away with it if he'd stuck to just doing it for his own gain and not shared the info with so many others. A few thousand dollars a year extra would pad his pocket nicely and be low enough value for him to either not have been spotted, or if he had been spotted quite possibly not investigated/prosecuted.
So why do we need a stock market again?
Sure people can buy something , sell it for more , and they made money. Great , but they didnt *do* anything that benefits society. Seems like cheating.
A futures trader has difficulty expressing himself at the 'old lady job justification hearing'.
So why do we need a stock market again?
Try thinking, it may help you with this question and many others in your life.
But to spell this one out, the reason we need a stock exchange is because the vast majority of people and companies don't want to commit their capital to a single company for the rest of time. And why should they? If there's no stock exchange, there's no way out, other than illiquid non-market trading.
So we have limited liability joint stock companies, we allow these to have their shares traded and listed on stock exchanges, and NOBODY HAS TO TAKE PART IF THEY DON'T WANT TO.
There IS quite a high (albeit difficult to quantify) societal value in having a mature secondary equity market precisely so that people can make equity investments of differing duration, and get a decent value when they sell. Defrauding the market is what this crime is about, but whatever you think of equity markets, they're actually very useful to a modern economy. Imagine you were an early stage investor in Uber. Now imagine there's no secondary market, so your investment is locked in. And you're tied to the rollercoaster, with no way out, merely hoping for some dividends before it crashes. Is that really the scenario you want?
Why not lay off against other trades, and use the knowledge to lay off against them? The guy's cleever enough to avoid electronic comms, but misses the bleedin' obvious smoking gun.
You know what I mean, that $2m profit could've been $138k for example, against a load of losses and static trades. Would anyone have looked and noted if that was the case? Can anyone with such knowledge explain why that wouldn't work, or at least reduce the risk?
Who knows how many fraudsters are doing precisely that. However, it does seem to be a psychological trait that these people become over-confident in their ability to game the system over a sufficiently long period of time, or brag about it to the wrong person. It only takes one red flag trip-point to trigger and that is it. How will you know if such a threshold has been tripped? You won't, there is no audible alarm, but once it has, data can be painstakingly collected until such time as the evidence is there to turn up on your doorstep and interrupt your plans for the next x years.
Wait, 11 comments on an article where someone got rich cheating the system and no leftist has implicated Trump in some way?
<<checks URL>> is this still the same Register?
<<wonders off chuckling mildly to myself>>
This guy wasn't as slick as he thought or he'd still be doing it.