back to article Defra recruiting 1,400 policy wonks to pick up the pieces after Brexit

Defra – the UK government's Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs – is hiring 1,400 "business policy" folk so it can untangle itself from Europe after Brexit, according to multiple insiders. Of those, 300 will be looking at the tech/policy side of things, including decoupling systems from decades of European …

Page:

  1. smudge
    FAIL

    I predict chaos

    It's many years since I last re-read "The Mythical Man-Month", but I do remember that one of its lessons was that throwing more people at a project which is behind time merely makes it later. The internal communication/co-ordination overhead soon outweighs any gains in productivity.

    Even if DEFRA don't read books about IBM mainframe operating systems, surely there must be modern management teachings which say the same thing?

    1. fedoraman

      Re: I predict chaos

      Ah yes, The "Self-propagating scheduling disaster".

      Great book, that one.

    2. paulf
      Coat

      Re: I predict chaos

      It'll be worse than chaos. That picture in the article shows a chicken with only one leg that seems to be responsible for a basket full of eggs. What kind of agricultural marvel is this fowl future? A sudden halving in the supply of chicken drumsticks will have the Colonel crying into his special mix of herbs and spices until they realise it's easier to catch them.

      I, for one, welcome our new Mono-pod Avian overlords.

  2. Gordon Pryra

    Brexit

    = jobs for the boys!

    Even if the majority of the new jobs in Brexit land will be a pile of absolute steaming shitcake...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Meh

      Re: Brexit

      = jobs for the boys!

      If they can find them e.g. try and hire 1,400 Java programmers overnight, and those are relatively common folk. And some other HMG departments, such as the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy are probably in a similar pickle and also trying to recruit.

      Maybe Theresa May has a magic policy wonk tree that we don't know about, especially as I imagine non-UK EU nationals aren't invited to the party in case their insecurity and status as a Brexit bargaining chip doesn't give them a sufficiently positive attitude towards slow motion train crashes.

      1. Dan 55 Silver badge

        Re: Brexit

        Brexit has completely screwed up contracting and free movement in general where it concerns the UK and British citizens. EU citizens won't come to the UK, EU citizens will leave the UK, British citizens working in the EU won't come back to the UK otherwise their residency clock in the EU country where they're currently resident will be reset and they probably don't want to lose that because that gives them a chance at getting citizenship, British citizens working in the EU won't move to another EU country to contract because that will also reset their residency clock, some British citizens in the UK may wish to leave the UK to get their last crack at residency or citizenship in an EU country, some EU citizens who take out British citizenship or British citizens who take out citizenship of the EU country they're in may find them obliged to renounce their other citizenship, and probably something else I've forgot.

        British IT contracting agencies specialising in work for EU citizens in the UK or British citizens in the EU must spend the day watching tumbleweed blowing through the office.

        All of this is mindless self-inflicted stupidity.

        1. inmypjs Silver badge

          Re: Brexit

          "All of this is mindless self-inflicted stupidity."

          Yes a terrible state of affairs as has been experienced by the whole rest of the world for ever.

          1. Tony W

            Re: Brexit

            Usual stuff, I have seen so much of it in comments. We don't care how much crap we (and our children) get just so long as we stop EU migration and can ignore the ECJ.

            Point out the obvious as much as you like (on both sides.) There will be no meeting of minds on this one.

            1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

              Re: Brexit

              "There will be no meeting of minds on this one."

              And when it's finally impossible to ignore the consequences we know what the few who will still admit to having been Leavers will say. We've already seen the "No true Scotsman" explanation being rehearsed.

        2. Snorlax Silver badge
          Thumb Up

          Re: Brexit

          @Dan 55:"All of this is mindless self-inflicted stupidity."

          Can we put this at the top of the article in 50pt text?

        3. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Brexit

          EU citizens won't come to the UK, EU citizens will leave the UK, British citizens working in the EU won't come back to the UK otherwise their residency clock in the EU country where they're currently resident will be reset

          More remoaner bollocks.

          There's no sign of EU citizens leaving, indeed recent newspaper stories suggest that they don't want to leave even if their companies want them to. British citizens who renounce it to get another citizenship can get the British one back afterwards just by asking. There's no 'residency clock', I'm a UK citizen, and I have a French "carte de séjour" that says "permanent". I return to the UK regularly.

          OK, we get it, you voted not to leave, but we're leaving. Would it be too much to ask that you STFU with the whinging and actually try and make it work? Or would you really prefer to see it all end in disaster just so you can stand in the queue at the dole office telling everyone "Well, I told them so." ?

          1. Dan 55 Silver badge

            Re: Brexit

            There's no sign of EU citizens leaving, indeed recent newspaper stories suggest that they don't want to leave even if their companies want them to. -> Pick the NHS or agriculture sector or university teaching or research article of your choice. Oh, here's one.

            British citizens who renounce it to get another citizenship can get the British one back afterwards just by asking. -> You can only get British citizenship back once, it's expensive, and relies on Home Office say-so. The other country may force you to choose either British or their nationality (e.g. Netherlands).

            There's no 'residency clock', I'm a UK citizen, and I have a French "carte de séjour" that says "permanent". I return to the UK regularly. -> If you move to another country and start permanent residency there, you will lose your permanent residency in France. If you start your clock again now before Brexit you will probably have not spent enough time resident in your new country to get citizenship by Brexit Day. I assume (hope) you do realise that visits to the UK at Christmas and holidays don't count because we are talking about permanent residency.

            Would it be too much to ask that you STFU with the whinging and actually try and make it work? -> Would it be too much to ask you to STFU and find out a bit about what TF you're F on about before positing? People like you let loose with a vote in the referendum in the first place got the UK into this mess. You might have been mislead before the vote, but there's no excuse to be now.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              you can only get British citizenship back once, it's expensive, and relies on Home Office say-so.

              Incorrect. You get it back once just by asking, if you try the same game again it gets harder, of course. The Home Office only wants a say if you're not a full British citizen at the time you renounced it, i.e. if your citizenship was obtained by some other way than birth in the UK to British citizens. Read the official form, it is quite clear.

              Obviously if I move permanently to another country I would no longer be a permament resident in France. That's not a time-based clock, and yes I do know that limited holidays don't count.

              People like you let loose with a vote in the referendum in the first place got the UK into this mess.

              Sadly I had no vote, becase Cameron reneged on his election promise to remove the 15-year limit on expat voting. I'm sorry you feel that I wasn't a suitable person to be "let loose" with a vote, democracy is hard to live with at times, isn't it. Perhaps you regret that the vote wasn't an EU-run one, where we could have been made to vote again and again until we got the right result?

              However, if I had been able to vote, I would have voted to leave. I would do so again today. I have not been misled, I have studied the issues for many years and after decades living outside the UK I am probably a lot better informed about the EU than many voters who have only lived in the UK.

              1. Dan 55 Silver badge

                Re: Brexit

                Incorrect. You get it back once just by asking, if you try the same game again it gets harder, of course. The Home Office only wants a say if you're not a full British citizen at the time you renounced it, i.e. if your citizenship was obtained by some other way than birth in the UK to British citizens. Read the official form, it is quite clear.

                Wrong. Read the guidance - section 1, there are conditions. Read the cost - an application with form RS1 is £1163.

                Obviously if I move permanently to another country I would no longer be a permament resident in France. That's not a time-based clock.

                If you have, say, spent four years in France you could not expect to move to another country, live and work there, come back, and continue where you left off. You'd need to apply for French residency all over again. Nor would that residency time in France count in your new country. If your new country also needed five years residency for permanent residence or citizenship and you wanted one of those, you couldn't manage to accrue that time that before Brexit Day. I struggle to see how you think that's not a clock.

                I have studied the issues for many years and after decades living outside the UK I am probably a lot better informed about the EU than many voters who have only lived in the UK.

                Possibly, but it still doesn't change the fact that you're wrong.

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: Brexit

                  Wrong. Read the guidance - section 1, there are conditions.

                  Indeed, the ones I mentioned:

                  You have a right (once only) to be registered as a British citizen if you renounced British citizenship in order to keep or acquire another citizenship.

                  A right, plain and simple.

                  You have a separate right (once only) to be registered as a British citizen if you renounced citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies

                  A right, once again.

                  If you renounced citizenship for any other reason, or if you have already renounced and resumed British citizenship (as a right), registration is at the discretion of the Home Secretary.

                  It can't be much clearer, you can get it back once as a right. Only after that will the Home Secretary want to exercise discretion.

                  As for the cost, I'd certainly hope it's expensive, it's not something to be taken lightly.

                  1. Dan 55 Silver badge

                    Re: Brexit

                    Your "just ask" is a ten page application form with a cost of over a thousand pounds.

                    The Home Office only wants a say if you're not a full British citizen at the time you renounced it, i.e. if your citizenship was obtained by some other way than birth in the UK to British citizens. Read the official form, it is quite clear.

                    Thus indicating you don't know the difference between British citizenship otherwise than by descent, British citizenship by descent, and the overseas British citizenships. I'm not surprised you won't put your name to the claptrap you post.

                    1. Anonymous Coward
                      Anonymous Coward

                      Re: Brexit

                      you don't know the difference between British citizenship otherwise than by descent, British citizenship by descent, and the overseas British citizenships.

                      There are many, many, different ways to hold British citizenship, and I didn't think it would be useful to post them all, so I (crudely) summarized.

                      I don't put my name for exactly the reason you have so aptly demonstrated, so we can discuss the issues without ad hominem attacks.

              2. Anonymous Coward
                Stop

                Re: Brexit

                You get it [British citizenship] back once just by asking, if you try the same game again it gets harder, of course. The Home Office only wants a say if you're not a full British citizen at the time you renounced it, i.e. if your citizenship was obtained by some other way than birth in the UK to British citizens. Read the official form, it is quite clear.

                It is indeed quite clear. The Government website says "In some cases it’s possible to resume your British nationality after renouncing it."1 which doesn't sound like "just by asking" to me.

                It costs £321 to renounce British Citizenship and then £1163 to apply to get it back and the application form is 10 pages long.2 It asks detailed questions like "do you have any criminal convictions in the UK or any other country or any civil judgements made against you (including traffic offences)?" - so that's the 9.2 million people in the UK who have criminal records who may be screwed, and civil judgements include someone successfully suing you, evicting you or even just divorcing you. And then there are several "what the fuck does that mean" questions like "Have you engaged in any other activities which may indicate that you may not be considered a person of good character?"

                As for your characterization of British citizens not born in the UK to British parents as not "full British citizens", I guess that means that people like the Duke of Edinburgh and indeed our illustrious Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs aren't "full British citizens". Has anyone told them?

                1https://www.gov.uk/renounce-british-nationality/resume-your-british-nationality

                2https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/417594/rs1_form_mar_2015.pdf

              3. smudge

                Re: Brexit

                Sadly I had no vote, becase Cameron reneged on his election promise to remove the 15-year limit on expat voting. I'm sorry you feel that I wasn't a suitable person to be "let loose" with a vote, democracy is hard to live with at times, isn't it.

                Let's get this straight.

                You have lived outside the UK for more than 15 years. Presumably in France.

                And yet, if you had had a vote, you would have voted for the UK to leave the EU.

                Why? And why do you think you should have had a vote?

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: Brexit

                  And yet, if you had had a vote, you would have voted for the UK to leave the EU.

                  Why?

                  Because I see the harm the EU is doing across Europe, and I expect one day to return to the UK, probably when I retire. The fact that I currently live outside the UK for work reasons doesn't change my views on the EU.

                  And why do you think you should have had a vote

                  I didn't say that I did, I merely pointed out that I didn't have one. I have no significant vote anywhere now.

              4. Trigonoceps occipitalis

                Re: Brexit

                " ... democracy is hard to live with at times ... "

                Cameron said "Let the people speak!"

                They have spoken.

                Bastards!

              5. Snorlax Silver badge

                Re: Brexit

                @Anonymous Coward:"Sadly I had no vote, becase Cameron reneged on his election promise to remove the 15-year limit on expat voting. I'm sorry you feel that I wasn't a suitable person to be "let loose" with a vote, democracy is hard to live with at times, isn't it. Perhaps you regret that the vote wasn't an EU-run one, where we could have been made to vote again and again until we got the right result?"

                If you lived in some other country for 15 years you don't deserve a say in what happens.

                Do you vote in local elections in whatever country you're in?

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: Brexit

                  Do you vote in local elections in whatever country you're in?

                  No. In my local village I have the "choice" of voting for one list, with the same names every year unless someone dies. Never seemed worth signing up just to feel that I have a say next time they agree to reimburse the teacher 27.32 euros for new school pencils.

            2. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge
              WTF?

              Re: Brexit

              Pick the NHS or agriculture sector or university teaching or research article of your choice. Oh, here's one.

              That's an article on how a British family business selling salad invested in new facilties but didn't get the increase in business that it needed to pay for it, which it blamed on the pound's fall after the referendum. It has nothing at all to do with EU citizens leaving the UK!

              1. Dan 55 Silver badge

                Re: Brexit

                Sorry, wrong tab. There's so much good news to choose from. Try this instead.

              2. Snorlax Silver badge

                Re: Brexit

                @Phil O'Sophical:"That's an article on how a British family business selling salad invested in new facilties but didn't get the increase in business that it needed to pay for it, which it blamed on the pound's fall after the referendum. It has nothing at all to do with EU citizens leaving the UK!"

                Ok, how about 17,200 EU staff leaving the NHS last year?:

                "The figures, compiled by NHS Digital, prompted medical leaders to call for more reassurances to European workers about their future in the UK. A total of 17,197 EU staff, including nurses and doctors, left their posts in 2016, compared with 13,321 in 2015 and 11,222 for 11 months in 2014."

                Now it might be easy to replace the Polish kids in your local McDonalds with homegrown talent, but can you say the same for doctors and nurses?

                1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

                  Re: Brexit

                  A total of 17,197 EU staff, including nurses and doctors, left their posts in 2016, compared with 13,321 in 2015 and 11,222 for 11 months in 2014.

                  Interesting that you stopped the quote there, and didn't continue with the next line:

                  "Even though EU staff numbers rose across the period analysed, experts fear the number of people leaving is the more significant trend."

                  So net EU staff numbers are going up but the Guardian's "experts fear" that the number they can use to crank the Brexit FUD machine is the significant one.

                  Well, it is the Guardian.

                  1. Snorlax Silver badge
                    Thumb Down

                    Re: Brexit

                    @Phil O'Sophical:"Interesting that you stopped the quote there"

                    Interesting that you can't read the article. The figures were compiled by NHS Digital, not The Guardian as you claim.

                    Don't let that get in the way of your bias eh?

                    1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

                      Re: Brexit

                      The figures were compiled by NHS Digital, not The Guardian as you claim.

                      The figures may have come from the NHS, the opinion that stated "experts fear the number of people leaving is the more significant trend" was part of the Guardian article that you linked to, clearly bylined. The expert quoted is from the RCP, she said "confirm our our fears that EU doctors are feeling unsettled and, at worst, leaving or planning to leave the UK". Fears, not figures.

                      So, I repeat, it's interesting that you stopped quotiong the Guardian article where you did, and left out the bit that said "EU staff numbers rose across the period analysed" in the Guardian article.

            3. Mike Pellatt

              Re: Brexit

              I have an Indefinite B1/B2 US Visa in one of my passports.

              Try getting into the USA on that now.

              "Permanency" on a travel document can e revoked by the issuing authority at any time.

            4. H in The Hague

              Re: Brexit

              "If you move to another country and start permanent residency there, you will lose your permanent residency in France. "

              That's right. Something similar happened to an Australian mate of mine: left NL for a year or two to work in the Middle East and promptly lost his permanent residency in NL. Bit of a problem as the house he owns is here. Ah, no problem, his wife is EU so they'll have to let him in - oh, wait, she's UK :(

          2. SiempreTuna

            Re: Brexit

            Which newspapers do you read? The Daily Fail? The Murdoch rags? The papers that propagated all the lies and bile spewed by the Brexit campaign, maybe? Y'know the lies and utter bollocks that started falling apart the morning of the result - literally.

            How about reading something that's even remotely interested in the truth, y'know, for a change?

            For anyone interested in reality, it is now certain that, best case, Brexit is an utter disaster. Unfortunately, the incompetents in charge of negotiating Brexit seem determined to turn that disaster into a calamity.

            Why on earth should remainers shut up? The racist* moron's who campaigned for Brexit told everyone that they were going to keep campaigning when they though the result was going against them: why would those with decency, common and sense, intelligence, a relationship with reality and the interests of the country not do the same?

            Somewhere down the line, we need to wake up and stop this nonsense before it's too late.

            * I campaigned for Remain and spoke to many, many Brexit voters and racism was the ONLY thing that mattered to them.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              Which newspapers do you read?

              Of the UK ones, usually the Telegraph and Independent to get some balance, sometimes the FT. Also Les Echos in France, and various local ones.

              How about reading something that's even remotely interested in the truth, y'know, for a change?

              Care to point me at any UK papers that fit in that category?

              For anyone interested in reality, it is now certain that, best case, Brexit is an utter disaster.

              Since there are still 18 months of negoitiations and posturing to go before we have any idea of what Berexit will actually look like, that statement is about as far from reality as one can get.

              why would those with decency, common and sense, intelligence, a relationship with reality and the interests of the country not do the same?

              Full of yourself, aren't you. Let me guess, you're a LibDem voter?

              Can you, perhaps, step back a moment and consider that you are demonstrating exactly the holier-than-thou, we-know-what's-best-for-everyone, sanctimonius righteousness that is precisely why so many people are pissed off with the EU? Someone with that attitude is the very last person I'd want in charge of a village council, let alone a country.

              Somewhere down the line, we need to wake up and stop this nonsense before it's too late.

              Yes, as noted before, democracy is such a bummer, isn't it. Better just to stop all that nonsense and do what we're told, eh papa?

              I campaigned for Remain and spoke to many, many Brexit voters and racism was the ONLY thing that mattered to them

              Well, that says a lot more about where you campaigned than anything.

            2. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              "The racist* moron's who campaigned for Brexit"

              And that attitude right there is why you lost.

              1. colinb

                Re: Brexit

                We've all lost.

                If you don't think so you are not one of the bargaining chips currently on the table.

          3. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Brexit

            "We shat on your plate, would it be too much to ask that you STFU with whinging and actually try to eat your dinner?"

          4. BongoJoe

            Re: Brexit

            More remoaner bollocks.

            That's it. I have had enough of this expression, "remoaner".

            From what I have seen over the past year and a bit over no end of web sites it's always been the pro-leavers who have been the moaners.

            So, what is going on?

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              it's always been the pro-leavers who have been the moaners.

              Strange, they're the ones who got what they wanted, what have they to moan about?

              The term "remoaner" is used for the people who voted to stay, didn't get what they wanted, and throw their toys out of the pram every time the subject is mentioned.

              Fortunately there are plenty of pragmatic remainers who, despite their disappointment, are prepared to work to make the decision successful. A far more constructive attitude.

              1. strum

                Re: Brexit

                >Strange, they're the ones who got what they wanted, what have they to moan about?

                They've been whining for forty years - why should they stop now?

                They're moaning about the EU not caving in to every half-baked suggestion from HMG, moaning about legal challenges to unlawful gummint actions, complaining about the divorce bill, mithering about the impracticality of replacing all the EU standards and regulations, disgusted that we'll have to renegotiate 700 trade deals - no longer handled by EU.

                Yeah. Whiners.

            2. codejunky Silver badge

              Re: Brexit

              @ BongoJoe

              "That's it. I have had enough of this expression, "remoaner"."

              I understand that. Its like being called brexiter, brexshitter, racist, xenophobe, idiot or if you want to go to the golden oldie eurosceptic! Although that last one fell out of favour when we were proved right having almost the same arguments as we are having now.

              "From what I have seen over the past year and a bit over no end of web sites it's always been the pro-leavers who have been the moaners."

              I can only assume you are doing extremely selective reading. Did you miss the protests, march, legal challenges and political party pledge to scrap democracy and dictate that the result should be declared illegitimate and undone without any further discussion? Or the constant insistence that good news be represented as bad and that any good news must be because we are in the EU but bad news because we are leaving.

              Did you miss all of that? Any of that? Fgs I have yet to see an EU topic discussed without this kind of rubbish. Remoaner seemed to appear in response to brexiter.

              1. Alic

                Re: Brexit

                The referendum result was not legally binding so it's neither legitimate or illegitimate, so there was nothing to undo. As Parliament stated it was a non- legally binding advisory vote or in other words a Government sponsored opinion poll. Even the Supreme Court held that position. I think it's reasonable to moan when the Government undemocratically attempts to misuse "the Royal Prerogative" and discount Parliamentary Sovereignty.

          5. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

            Re: Brexit

            Would it be too much to ask that you STFU with the whinging and actually try and make it work?

            How? If you have an answer please let the cabinet know because they don't seem to have one.

            Or would you really prefer to see it all end in disaster just so you can stand in the queue at the dole office telling everyone "Well, I told them so." ?

            No we wouldn't but have a nasty suspicion that that's what will happen anyway. And when it does you'll scarcely be able to find anyone who claims to have voted leave.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              >>Would it be too much to ask that you STFU with the whinging and actually try and make it work?

              >How?

              If you approach a difficult challenge with the attitude of "I don't see why I should bother, it'll all end in disaster anyway, it's all your fault, you're stupid and you've ruined my life, you racist moron" then you really can't be surprised that:

              a) It will end in disaster, and

              b) The people who are actually trying to make it work get royally pissed off with you

              If you're not willing to work towards the solution, at least try not to be part of the problem. Please.

              1. strum

                Re: Brexit

                >If you're not willing to work towards the solution, at least try not to be part of the problem. Please.

                You weren't, so why the fuck should we listen to you?

              2. Alic

                Re: Brexit

                Please provide the an outline for a workable solution to the NI/EU border question. A solution within the timeframe for Defra's problem multiplied across a government of 405,000 civil service employees whose IT systems now need to be completely revamped, rewritten, created, tested from scratch within 20 months, while dealing with a moving target and not even knowing the basis for the systems. This is a perfect storm of a disaster and any assistance to this unnecessarily self inflicted disaster is the equivalent of going below decks on the Titanic with a bucket and a sponge.

                a) It's not going to end in a disaster, it already is one. (just look up VC funding issues in the UK due to Brexit).

                b)I really don't care if those who are sponging water off the Titanic's decks "get pissed at me" just so long as they pay at least a minimum of twice my current rates (I like being paid significantly more than inept Theresa May) to waste my time on impossible and unrealistic projects, which have as much chance to succeed as did the Immigration IT initiatives that TM bolluxed and wasted almost £1 billion on.

                If your not willing to work towards the solution (reversing Brexit), at least try not to be part of the problem (acting for Brexit). Please

          6. paulf
            Mushroom

            Re: Brexit

            @AC "There's no sign of EU citizens leaving, "

            I have two friends - both are from EU nations, both work well paid professional jobs (IT/technology) and pay lots of tax, both do charity/voluntary work in their local community, and both are leaving soon as a direct result of Brexit and the sudden rise of xenophobia they've experienced because they're Forrinurs.

            It may be only two data points but by itself it blows the absolute claim you make out of the water - and they're not the only ones.

          7. smartypants

            Re: Brexit

            'Would it be too much to ask that you STFU with the whinging and actually try and make it work?'

            Assuming you to be one of the minority of the 37% of the population which voted Leave for reasons *other* than xenophobia, muslims, 350m a week for the NHS lies etc...

            Why is it OUR job to work out how to make brexit work when you lot can't even agree on what it is? See the latest hilarious policy document about the NI border... Perhaps your side should have thought things through *before* a referendum so you wouldn't be asking your enemies how to make your stupid idea fly. Ffs.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Brexit

              Assuming you to be one of the minority of the 37%

              Proof that we're in a minority?

              Why is it OUR job to work out how to make brexit work

              I've never suggested that it is. It would just be good if you'd stop getting in the way of people who are trying to make it work. Some of us actually care about this being successful, even for the folks who didn't want it.

              As for not understanding what it is, it seems to have escaped your notice that it is a negotiation, and one of the key things about a negotiation is that you don't know the result until you've actually negotiated.

              1. Alic

                Re: Brexit

                Proof that that you're in the minority.

                Theresa May losing her majority and becoming a minority government, when she asked the electorate to increase her mandate to make Brexit easier and the electorate rejected that.

                What gives you the right to demand that i make Brexit work, when your poin sition has led to an abrogation of my rights without compensation or compassion. How do I trust you not to take away more of my rights, particularly as the current Government, with full knowledge, attempted to bypass democracy and Parliamentary Sovereignty and continues to force the issue (No Queen's speech in 2018 as there's no time for it but the PM can take an extra weeks holiday abroad?) with parliamentary tricks and bribes (£1.5 billion)

                1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

                  Re: Brexit

                  Theresa May losing her majority and becoming a minority government, when she asked the electorate to increase her mandate to make Brexit

                  That's an interesting interpretation of the situation, but doesn't correspond with the facts.

                  May was stupid enough to believe polls which said she had a chance to get a large majority, which would have put her in a position of much greater power in general. She then announced (or rather her advisors told her to announce) that her new powerful government would introduce laws that directly hit the finances of the people who voted for her. Unsurprisingly, they gave her a kicking.

                  It had little to do with Brexit, which should be obvious since the party which gained from the election was Labour, also pro-Brexit. The LibDems, who are vehemently anti-Brexit made only small gains, and even lost the seat which their anti-Brexit campaigner had won from Zac Goldsmith at the previous election. May is an clueless autocratic menace who does far more harm than good to the tories. The missed a chance to kick her out after the election and I think they'll come to regret that. That was the election issue, not Brexit.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like