nav search
Data Center Software Security Transformation DevOps Business Personal Tech Science Emergent Tech Bootnotes BOFH

back to article
US Navy developers test aircraft carrier drone control software

Silver badge

The Captain better watch his back. Once he's got rid of the need of human pilots, someone higher than him will ask if they really need human sailors.

0
0
Silver badge

I'm old and geeky enough to remember a star trek episode where the enterprise is the test bed for a new computer, named M5 (odd to call it after a motorway, but still...), that took over James T's role. It didn't end well if I recall correctly.

1
0
Silver badge
Coat

The MD-5 Unmanned Carrier Aviation Mission Control System (UMCS) was tested under lab conditions using a lorry in place of the drone

Hmm, that must have been interesting, a flying lorry, whatever next!

4
0
Anonymous Coward

flying lorries have amazon logos on them, surely?

4
0
Silver badge
Boffin

Was it a Testbedford?

They also found that lorries don't so much fly as plummet.

7
0
Bronze badge

Re: plummet

sort of like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf3mgmEdfwg

0
0
Silver badge

Really??

"The drone is specifically being developed to be resistant to hackers, according to the USN"

As opposed to every other computer system in the world where resistance to hacking is optional?

(I discount IoT devices for good reasons)

6
0
Silver badge

Re: Really??

They may be hacker proof but are they jarhead proof?

3
0
Joke

Re: Really??

To be truly hacker proof, they will have to upgrade to the SHA-2 Done

2
0
Trollface

Re: Really??

They may be hacker proof but are they jarhead proof?

That feature is available on the U.S. Marines' version.

2
0

Re: Really??

It was a transcription error. The drone is resistant to Hackers, the movie. It spends its idle time posting to Twitter and reddit with derogatory comments about the film.

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Really??

They may be hacker proof but are they jarhead proof?

Ah no, for that they will need the Pro version..

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Really??

Unfortunately, I suspect that it's an entirely reasonable comment given that currently most software development (not just the IOT stuff) appears to be based on the "put it out there and if someone pokes a hole we can always release a patch, maybe" principle.

0
0
Silver badge
Devil

"The drone is specifically being developed to be resistant to hackers"

Oddly enough, I happened to have come across 10,000 gallons of aviation fuel, which I can sell for a very reasonable price!

10
0
Silver badge
Joke

So nice to caption the photo!

That was a right generous thing to caption that photo, "A US Navy F/A-18 Hornet taking off from an aircraft carrier". Seeing as you British folks may have forgotten what an airplane taking off from a carrier looks like. Also that it's a US plane and not a secret British prototype. Might have confused people, yanno.

"OMG why does that runway end over the water, isn't that dangerous? That poor pilot barely off the ground, he must have crashed! And why can't I find video of it on Youtube?"

[with all my sympathy for your naval aviation woes. Our turn will come when we have to rely on those F-35 horrors]

10
4
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Re: So nice to caption the photo!

Apparently a sense of humour by-pass is now available on the NHS, hence the downvotes.

5
0
Silver badge

Re: So nice to caption the photo!

What black magic is this that allows an aircraft to take off from a carrier, without a ski jump at the end?

We are quite familiar with runways that end at the sea however. Do yours have public roads going across them as well?

3
0
Gold badge
Unhappy

"the MQ-25 will now mainly be used for topping up the tanks of manned aircraft"

Until the top brass realized that would (slowly) start to make "Naval Aviators" as a breed extinct.

But note it's easy to upgrade because it's a got a framework already on board.

Is it my imagination or is this thing quietly acquiring capabilities faster than the F35?

2
0
Silver badge

Re: "the MQ-25 will now mainly be used for topping up the tanks of manned aircraft"

Until the top brass realized that would (slowly) start to make "Naval Aviators" as a breed extinct.

Not in the view of top brass. Navy, Air Force (and others) are all the same. The top brass are former top guns, and they believe the idea that (a) there is a special class of human who are the only ones that can become a top gun, and (b) a top gun will outfly any computer. This means that their entire world view is based on self validation - that's common for many people. As a result the top brass aren't working to replace fighter pilots, because they earnestly believe those people are the ubermenschen who defend our "freedoms".

To a large extent, (a) is correct purely due to the skills, coordination and reactions required, but of course (b) is totally wrong.

4
0

Would I be right in thinking that this is a cats and traps only design? So not something us Brits can buy for our catlass Queen Lizzies? Who exactly thought a catless carrier was a good idea?

1
0
Silver badge

Who exactly thought a catless carrier was a good idea?

The civil service. They'd read that Larry was on duty at no.10, and assumed that was all the cats that were needed.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

New Patent innovation buzzword: "Drone"

The US Navy has tested a software package that will allow aircraft carriers running it to use its planned drone air-to-air tankers for communications relay and surveillance duties.

In software terms UMCS is not a big leap: USN developers plugged existing mission management, planning and sensor control software into the US Navy's Common Control System framework, tailoring each element as required to talk to the "drone" systems being used.

I would agree it isn't a big leap, the idea of using aircraft as communications relays etc. was part of a US Navy combat communications systems specification that crossed my desk back in the mid 1980's.

So it would appear that the big 'feature' is "use of a drone" as a communications relay, hence why I suspect we will see many new and 'innovative' patents where the only new and 'innovative' feature is "use in a drone".

0
0

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing