Linux Mint-using terror nerd awaits sentence for training Islamic State A paranoid Welsh Muslim who wore gloves while typing on his laptop, admitted being part of Islamic State, and, gasp, harbored a copy of Linux Mint, has been described as a “new and dangerous breed of terrorist.” Samata Ullah, 34, who also used voice modulation software to disguise his thick Welsh accent while making …
OK, that does it. I'm switching to Christian Linux.
OK, that does it. I'm switching to Christian Linux.
Could be useful for an elderly friend of mine who needs his computer to be usable again. Wonder how readily it'll update to a more modern underlying distro (it's based on Ubu 12). And would mean I don't have to install the extras I often do. Wish I'd come across this one earlier.
Thanks!
[The flash disks] contained military manuals for guided missiles, which Ullah was said to have been preparing to translate for the Islamic State terrorist organization
[...]
“This is just the sort of information that may have helped people involved in planning devastating, low technical level attacks on crowded places as we have seen in other cities across the world,” added [Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Commander Dean Haydon]. (Emphasis added.)
So guided missiles are low tech now?
And while we're on the subject, who needs help planning the "drive a large vehicle into a crowd" type of terrorist attack? Seems like everything you need to know is in the description.
> So guided missiles are low tech now?
You know, when you sit and think about it, they kind of are, nowadays.
The first guided missiles to be used in combat were used by the Nazis in WWII, so we are talking almost 70 yeas ago. If they could make guided missiles 70 years ago, It would surprise me if a team of dedicated people with knowledge of programming and electronics, and with access to machine tools, would be unable to do the same now.
In fact, consider the arrays of sensors and servos you can attach to an Arduino or Raspberry pi, not to mention the compute power of these small systems eclipse anything available back then.
Sure, I don't think home made guided missiles would hold their own against the latest military hardware, but if the goal is to hit undefended civilian targets (like airliners) then they could work.
In fact my biggest surprise is that someone hasn't done it yet I remember a guy who tried to build a DIY cruise missile, but got shut down by the government when it was realised how easy it was for him to do it.
EDIT - Found the original sites (from 2003). Consider how now there are quite a few autonomous autopilot projects which are open source and open hardware, and it should be even easier to do the below if you were so inclined:
https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/03/04/29/1857212/build-your-own-cruise-missile
http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/cruise.shtml
http://www.interestingprojects.com/cruisemissile/
( Black helicopters because I am sure I ended up on some "lists" due to my most recent Google search history in order to dig up this info)
I believe Hamas does it. Whatever you think of Israel, directing inaccurate missiles against civilian targets is a shitty thing to do.
So's stealing somebody else's country, kicking them out of it, and then acting the victim when the third generation of dispossessed are still angry at being born in refugee camps and living in squalor. And so's bombing all the civil infrastructure of a neighbouring country just to make a point.
>So's stealing somebody else's country
I too dislike Israel's failure to negotiate in good faith. But surely you are clever enough to realize that Hamas' missiles mostly provide a fig leaf to Israel no negotiation stance? As well as subject Palestinian to more Israeli bombing, thus breeding more Hamas supporters?
The world should boycott, as happened to South Africa, until 1967 occupied territories are withdrawn from and the afferent UN resolution 242 implemented. No need to atone our Holocaust guilt on the backs of the Palestinians.
Despite that, I also support Israel's right to self-defense.
Oh, The stealing is not the problem, this kind of thing happened everywhere since like even before one ape managed to bump another on the head with a rock - not "finishing the job" immediately after 1948 is what is causing all the trouble!
“If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.”
― Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince
Are accurate missiles okay?
Must be since all of the "collateral damage" caused by western "precision" bombings does not matter one little bit at all - even though we are about at the same level of Civilian vs "Taliban" as we had with Civilian vs Nazi in f.ex. Dresden or Hamburg back int the day. But, hey, who cares? Stockholders are Happy.
@Ogi - Any WWII era or earlier technology is effectively open including nuclear weapons. Too many technically literate people have a reasonable grasp of how these technologies work and how they can be made. In many cases, what stops people is being about to source the materials needed. Guide missiles are easy except for possibly the engines. The engine operating temperature and fuels limit the materials they can be made out of. There are few materials that have right combination of properties to be used in the engine and they tend to be expensive. Ditto for nuclear weapons - getting sufficient pure U or PL is not easy. Chemical and biological weapons are probably easier as the source material is often relatively cheap and fairly common.
Other issues to worry about include G force at launch and vibration during flight. To say nothing of entering/leaving a condensing atmospheric condition and temperature extremes. Static electricity is also a problem. Etc. Not something I plan on reverse engineering anytime soon.
Other issues to worry about include G force at launch and vibration during flight. To say nothing of entering/leaving a condensing atmospheric condition and temperature extremes. Static electricity is also a problem. Etc. Not something I plan on reverse engineering anytime soon.
Tempted NOT to post this as someone may take it the wrong way, and ban the activities I'm about to mention. Or use said activities to harm others (in whatever way this is done, it is wrong!).
There's lots of people who build "model" rockets capable of reaching the upper atmosphere, perhaps even escaping the atmosphere (not gravity, but they probably could achieve this). Lots of footage on YT etc. The Apollo "computers" must have been much more sensitive to knocks and vapours. The tech isn't hard and I've figured out several ways to protect electronics from such things, though most of the cameras I've seen launched seem to be stock, no mods to protect them.
"getting sufficient pure U or PL is not easy. "
Oh, you can get quite pure uranium all right - just dig around in shell craters in Iraq. The problem is that it's the wrong kind of uranium, and it's the extraction of the 235 isotope that, fortunately, presents a difficult problem. If anyone ever invents a simple, cheap means of isotopic separation, goodbye civilisation. A gun-type uranium bomb won't, however, fit into any guided missile whose construction wouldn't attract a lot of attention. Those things are big.
Fortunately too, not only is Pu hard to obtain, it's hard to make it into an effective bomb.
"You know, when you sit and think about it, they kind of are, nowadays."
One might be inclined to agree - until one remembers how, for instance, a mature and proven rocket went bang testing an attached scramjet prototype just because the rocket's control fins couldn't take the dynamic loads involved, which would not have been present in the much rarefied atmosphere said rocket would have been in by then during a normal flight profile - without anyone involved spotting that this would be an issue...? Yeah, I think rocket engineering is still the rocket engineering of rocket engineering...
UserMcUser And while we're on the subject, who needs help planning the "drive a large vehicle into a crowd" type of terrorist attack? Seems like everything you need to know is in the description.
Indeed. Isn't the sentence "a drive-a-large-vehicle-into-a-crowd terrorist attack" both a factual description, but also more worryingly, technically a terrorism how-to instruction manual as defined by the UK's current hysterical and overly-loose anti-terror laws? I mean, put the words "Step 1:" in front of the phrase and whoops, off to Parkhurst you go.
@P.Lee - Modern military missiles are high tech but the basic technology was worked out by the 60's at the latest. Also, it is relatively well understood by too many so putting together a team to make a guided missile is not hard. The issue is some of the technical problems that dog military designs from the 40s forward are still present and that will take a certain level manufacturing competence to solve. In other words, the engineering knowledge to make a nuclear armed guided missile is readily available. But what stops many it manufacturing needed to make some of the critical pieces and the availability of the raw materials. So in the sense that the knowledge is there, low tech, but some of the infrastructure requires a good bit of money to build if does not exist locally.
This post has been deleted by its author
It's not MS Windows, so it must be be some scary operating system that actually works as advertised.
To say nothing about being able to use it without the OS tattling on you to the mother ship. Who, but never-do-wells would ever use such a system?
>Wassat? Common User File Format?
$ apt show cufflinks
"Cufflinks assembles transcripts, estimates their abundances, and tests for differential expression and regulation in RNA-Seq samples. It accepts aligned RNA-Seq reads and assembles the alignments into a parsimonious set of transcripts. Cufflinks then estimates the relative abundances of these transcripts based on how many reads support each one."
Oh, you mean the town in France....
The USA can't easily ban 'apt' now can they? Remember that France has nuclear weapons.
D.T. needs to be careful here or a stray missile might just possible go off course and wipe out one of his Golf Courses. That won't be a crime on humanity as nothing ever worth doing ever took place on a golf course.
D.T. needs to be careful here or a stray missile might just possible go off course and wipe out one of his Golf Courses. That won't be a crime on humanity as nothing ever worth doing ever took place on a golf course.
Hey, careful there. One of those courses is a couple miles away from an inherited piece of property we haven't managed to sell off yet. OTOH might get enough of a settlement on it we could just abandon it.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
