Re: Satellites?
{article}“Our goal is to be a low cost version of the terrestrial alternatives,” said Gomez. “Once you've installed fibre and protected it against vandalism you're done. We aim to be competitive against that.”{/article}
{David Roberts} "I think that the construction and launch costs for these are orders of magnitude less than those for satellites.""
I suspect that in the medium to longer term, rolling out fibre will be cheaper and more competitive than a fleet of very expensive drones which will fly for "only" weeks at time before coming back for service and maintenance.
What worries me is that in the very short term, these drones may actually seem cheaper, thus seeing off anyone wanting to install a proper infrastructure and once established in an area, making it almost impossible later on down the line for anyone to even consider competing with an established service because of the up front capital costs and the now tied in "customers". I can see cash strapped sub-Saharan countries jumping at this "free" infrastructure, only to regret it a a few years down the line.