nav search
Data Center Software Security Transformation DevOps Business Personal Tech Science Emergent Tech Bootnotes BOFH

back to article
McAfee-the-man wants McAfee-the-brand, Chipzilla says no

Silver badge

McAfee-the-man

loves trolling

6
0
Silver badge

Maybe McAfee-the-man needs to change his name? Not sure to what though.

0
0
Trollface

Maybe change it to Peter Norton?

If I was John McAfee I'd just keep going around being John McAfee. At some point Intel will almost beg him to take his name back from them as I don't think his character fits the stuffy Intel image too well.

6
0
Silver badge

'Johnny Intel' sounds about right tbh

4
0

Too easy to confuse with a film, how about changing it to In Tel Macfee.

0
0
Silver badge

gonna end up badly for McAfee-the-man

Because SCO tried the exact same IIRC.

0
3
Silver badge

If he has $3B then...

Intel will probably settle out of court. Why $3B? Well that's what some financial news sites are saying that is the amount the Intel want to get for their security software biz.

Then he could have his name above the door again.

Personally, I wouldn't give as much as $0.03 for it but that's just my opinion.

1
0
Paris Hilton

Already tried - and failed - in the fasion industry

Ines de la Fressange started a fashion design company, in her name and trademarked it. One management buy-out later, Ines de la Fressange-Person gets ousted from the company, started another fashion company in her own name. Ines de la Fresange-company sued her, and after a series of counter sueballs, the court ruled that she had set up her name as a trademark to the company she trademarked it to, and lost her rights to that name when she left the company. The last I remember, she went back and renamed her new company "Ines"...

So given the crap that Intel has foisted on us in McAffee's name, and given that there is already a TV channel called "Dave", why not just found an IT firm called "John"?

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Already tried - and failed - in the fasion industry

Because you'd never find it with search engines.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Already tried - and failed - in the fasion industry

Yes, it can get a bit convoluted. McAfee the man would be ok in most jurisdictions so long as uses the name in a different industry and stays well away from any similarity with the logo of AV McAfee the brand. But I'm guessing he wants back into the computer industry with his new McAfee Technologies brand.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Oh boy...

I'd normally pooh-pooh those who want to wrap everything even slightly unsettling in trigger warnings - but Jesus F'ing Christ, you might want to change that lead image to something else! (or move it down the page, or even yes, throw a warning on the link).

I get the humorous reference/allusion, but I can tell you having that pop up in front of you ain't that funny if you've ever been in the same position IRL...

2
11
Silver badge

Re: Oh boy...

You've been face to face with John McAfee. You have my sympathy.

4
0

Re: Oh boy...

You have had a naked John McAfee pointing a gun at you IRL? Damn.

I certainly understand that this would quite traumatizing but exactly how was El Reg to know that you would read this. I mean what are the odds of that sort of thing.

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Oh boy...

That he's naked and armed? Probably about 50-50...

2
0

This post has been deleted by a moderator

Silver badge

The saga continues...

0
0

It's quite hard to tell the difference between

"McAfee" and "John McAfee Global Technologies"

but then I wouldn't buy anything from either company.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: It's quite hard to tell the difference between

Doesn't matter what the differences are - as a lawyer told me long ago, what matters are the similarities. And it's not difficult to tell when one name is wholly included in another.

2
0
Silver badge

Why doesn't he call the company "The Real McAffee Company/Corp/Inc/Whatever"

0
0
Bronze badge
FAIL

The well was poisoned long ago

The McAfee name was poisoned a long time ago. The products rubbish, the pushing of them onto unsuspecting customers constant and the support (somehow) even worse than the products themselves.

I'd value the name at US$2.50 and be gladly rid of it, but apparently Intel's management are suckers enough to buy it in the first place - and so probably need a bit more as justification for getting rid of it again.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: The well was poisoned long ago

I was recently required to install McAfee-Endpoint-Security-for-Mac-10.1.0-RTW-standalone-1997 (seemingly, not a date but a codenumber) in order to secure my computer from russian cybersquirrels

time passes. . .

after rather a lot of shit I finally found out how to remove it

Terminal: sudo /usr/local/McAfee/uninstall EPM

this removed the product after a restart, and all was well. . .

after a few weeks - Mac was a bit poorly - and Activity Monitor/Console revealed MUCH McAfuckery still going on

this time I had to run a script that was unexplainably left in teh library

Terminal: /Library/McAfee/agent/scripts/uninstall.sh

Aha, now I know that 1997 really was the datecode for the AV product - it's back to the time when the AV solution is worse than the russkies, at least with their APT, my system would work reliably

Yet still, McAfee still hasn't gone - my Mac xpc calls

'/usr/local/McAfee/AppProtection'

'/usr/local/McAfee/Firewall'

'/usr/local/McAfee/AntiMalware'

'/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.mcafee.virusscan.fmpd.plist'

'/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.mcafee.virusscan.ScanManager.plist'

'/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.mcafee.virusscan.VShieldEPOInterface.plist'

'/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.mcafee.virusscan.eupdate.plist'

approximately every ten seconds, so perhaps the code has gone - but some throttling hooks remain.

lots of com.McAfuckup "service only ran for 0 seconds, pushing respawn for 9 seconds"

I think I will wipe the disk

. . .and they expect us to pay money for this sort of 1990's AV experience!?

2
0
obr

Re: The well was poisoned long ago

You removed the management platform and the agent without removing the AV or FW modules.

Product Guide Page 26: https://kc.mcafee.com/resources/sites/MCAFEE/content/live/PRODUCT_DOCUMENTATION/26000/PD26214/en_US/ensm_1010_pg_0_00_en_us.pdf

Funny that you'd wipe the disk but not spend <10 secs googling [mcafee endpoint security mac 10.1 product guide] and then searching that document for "uninstall".

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Thanks obr, as an Apple Mac user I obviously never RTFM! ;-)

. . .I just did the ten seconds google for "remove McAfee" - and many people seem to think it's teh first script, google never mentioned the second removal script, so I guess there are hundreds of eejits like me with a bit screwed system

I recently tried Eset Cyber Security Pro, nice GUI, bit it couldn't find sh!t on my Mac unless I ran teh (free) Bitdefender Virus Scanner stand-alone first, then Eset noticed all the wonderful Win32 viruses popping up in temporary memory (Many Macs that I see are stuffed with UXB in teh form of Windows malware)

i think the (free to d/l from AppStore & use) Bitdefender Virus Scanner is the best of the bunch , today

0
0
obr

Glad I could help :)

Funny thing you mention though is regarding all the Win32 malware on your Mac. I work with a lot of customers who require AV on their *nix (although not necessarily Mac) systems thinking that it will protect them. The vast (like >99%) of the signatures in that AV are for detecting Win malware that could reside on the *nix filesystem (handy if you use that *nix box as some sort of fileserver or whatnot) but the signatures are not generally for protecting those boxen even if it's labelled "super-awesome *nix viruscatcher".

If you want to protect *nix then you gotta use whitelisting. EOM.

0
0

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing