back to article The next Cuban gristle crisis: US Navy warship powered by beef fat

The USS Stockdale, a guided-missile-launching destroyer, has set sail powered by an unusual fuel – waste beef fat. The ship, deployed this week in the USS John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, is part of the Navy's Great Green Fleet initiative, which is trying to make swabbies more environmentally friendly by using alternative …

Page:

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Most uneconomical approach yet?

    Instead of reducing the amount of cows grown... lets just keep growing them, and find other ways to get rid of the unwanted excess product!

    Yeah, sounds legit. o_O

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

      I'm with you bro. We should introduce worldwide rationing on farm animals which will put the price up so only the super rich can afford to eat meat. The rest of us should get by on beans and lentils - it's healthier for us and the environment. Screw freedom of choice!

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

        If this stuff's $2.05 a gallon, then it seems to me that if the objective is to ensure a strategic fuel supply for the navy it would be a lot cheaper to build massive underground storage and buy the real thing off our Arab and other oil-producing "friends", especially while it's down at $30 a barrel.

      2. Long John Brass

        Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

        Eat recycled food; It's good for the environment and it's OK for you

      3. Arctic fox
        Headmaster

        Re: "The rest of us should get by on beans and lentils -

        it's healthier for us and the environment."

        I realise of course that you were being satirical, however there are those who actually do believe that it would be better for the environment. It would in fact require a huge extension of arable monoculture farming right across the face of the planet in order to do this. The irony of the vegan position is that it would do massive damage to the earth's ecosystem if we all dropped eating meat.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: "The rest of us should get by on beans and lentils -

          "monoculture farming" is a big problem and usually ends the crop.

          Just ask any Banana farmer.

          1. Richard Altmann

            Re: "The rest of us should get by on beans and lentils -

            Mmmh, In East Africa, once the bananas are harvested, the shrub is chopped down and applied as fertilizer for the next upcoming sucker. After a few years the shrub grows on one meter or even higher heap of itself. Don´t know, how its handled on the plantations that deliver so called bananas to europe.

            Africans they are not due EU import regulations. Chiquita dictated the definition of an EU banana standard.

            You don´t find any of the 20 or more varieties of african bananas in europe. Nothing of the non sweet, starch rich cooking bananas or the 4" long super sweets. Just the mealy Chiquitas.

            same applies for potatoes. Last night´s business idea is to open up a fish´n chips with 10 varieties of potatoes to choose from. European citizens have been prohabited to enjoy the riches of what the world has to offer by the Food Mafia.

            Sorry, went off the topic here (again).

            Next week, i will be back in Africa and enjoy an avocado the size of a handball and a doublesize pineapple, NGM Wheed, a real steak, triple destilled banana gin ...

            Not for holidays but for my new IT-ManAnger contract. Asante Sana

            1. x 7

              Re: "The rest of us should get by on beans and lentils -

              " triple destilled banana gin ..."

              now that sounds like a business worth exploiting

    2. Martin Summers Silver badge

      Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

      Wow, does this thread get the record for most posts deleted by a moderator or what? Shame I didn't catch them before to see what all the fuss was about!

      1. Rol

        Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

        @ Martin Summers

        First comment was extolling another round of terrorist atrocities aimed at America.

        Subsequent comments suggested a certain scythe wielding skeleton with a pronounced Tourettes disorder visited the commentard. And justifiably so.

      2. ZSn

        Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

        @Martin Summers. You didn't miss anything worthwhile - it certainly isn't worth repeating. Somebody came home from the pub in a bad mood guessing from the timing and the comment. The original and a lot of the deleted were 'anonymous cowards' as well. I think alcohol and the 'Post anonymously' button are a bad combination. Either that or restrict the ability to post anonymously to only once or twice a day (preferably not after beer o'clock).

        I shouldn't have fed the troll but the comment irked me as well even though I'm not a great fan of America either.

        1. Mpeler
          Coat

          Re: Most uneconomical approach yet?

          Seems like they were really Anonymous CowHerds, then...

          (gets me coat...and me shovel...wellies...)

  2. This post has been deleted by its author

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Going green, and blue, and red, and pink...

    If we're talking alternative fuels, there only one AltFuel good enough for the US Navy: Unicorn farts.

    High energy content, smells nice, and actually removes CO2 from the air when it burns!

    There is one caveat; Ironically this potent fuel is a bit TOO energetic for long-term reliable use in engines. Happily tho a small admixture of gnome farts produces a satisfactory burning rate.

    1. Rol

      Re: Going green, and blue, and red, and pink...

      I read about a guy who ran his moped on monkey spunk, but I seem to remember it was a little sluggish and the local zoo wasn't being very cooperative, so he traded it in for a better model that ran on leopards fanny batter.

      Although come to think about it, it was a Viz cartoon strip and might not have been totally accurate.

      Anyway, I assume after reading that most deplorable AC comment above, I couldn't be any more offensive if I tried.

    2. MyffyW Silver badge

      Re: Going green, and blue, and red, and pink...

      Love the reach for the mystic @Big_John.

      On a more mundane note: Have they considered powering this by fat derived from the pork barrel procurement practices?

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Alternative fuels

    Of course, for many years navies were extremely green, because ships were almost entirely made of renewables and ran off wind power. Since then we've gone backwards.

    1. x 7

      Re: Alternative fuels

      " ships were almost entirely made of renewables "

      not really true.........tree felling for ships wildly exceeded the growth and replanting rates.

      Thats why there are few old healthy oaks in Britain - all the good ones were felled. All the old oaks alive now survived because they were diseased with rotten crowns or cores

      Thats why we imported mahogany and other timbers for ship building

      1. allthecoolshortnamesweretaken

        Re: Alternative fuels

        Yep. Spain, too. Lots of forests - before their fleets were built.

        1. Richard Altmann

          Re: Alternative fuels

          Lebanon was fellt by the romans

      2. Steve Davies 3 Silver badge

        Re: Alternative fuels

        Thats why there are few old healthy oaks in Britain - all the good ones were felled. All the old oaks alive now survived because they were diseased with rotten crowns or cores

        What a load of crap.

        The Government recognised that there was indeed a shortage of Oak around the time of Trafalgar. That's why many, many oaks were planted and are still alive today. Oak Tree Common in Hartley Wintney is one of those plantations. Apparently they stopped when someone told them that it would be at least 100 years before those trees would be good for ships. By then we were building them out of iron and steel.

        not all the oaks alive today were alive back then either. I have at least 20 such trees in my Woodland that are less than 30 years old. They are thriving now because the old oak that overshadowed them was felled a few years ago. The wood from that tree is keeping my home nice and cozy thank you very much.

        1. x 7

          Re: Alternative fuels

          ". That's why many, many oaks were planted and are still alive today"

          you make my point for me. If felling oaks for shipbuilding had been sustainable, then that planting campaign would not have been needed: the forests would have been self-regenerating.

          As it was, we couldn't, and didn't have sustainable forests, and when that was realised, the Admiralty planting scheme - which was half-hearted at best due to costs - was abandoned as pointless.

          and I go back to my original point - the only oaks that survived our shipbuilding were the diseased ones. Go and take a look around somewhere like Sherwood, which does have a lot of old trees. They are all diseased and dying, the good ones were all cleared. They may have been dying for three hundred years or so, but in oak terms that's recent. Those trees in that plantation you're citing? Mere youngsters in comparison - and probably only just getting big enough to use for smaller ship timbers

          1. JeffyPoooh
            Pint

            Re: Alternative fuels - oak trees, mandatory reference...

            http://thetyee.ca/Views/2004/03/24/Planning_Six_Centuries_Ahead/

            If a fable, a nice one.

            1. x 7

              Re: Alternative fuels - oak trees, mandatory reference...

              nice story

              the problem of course is finding enough men skilled in the work of shaping the timbers and jointing and erecting them correctly. Not a very common practice nowadays

              1. Pompous Git Silver badge

                Re: Alternative fuels - oak trees, mandatory reference...

                the problem of course is finding enough men skilled in the work of shaping the timbers and jointing and erecting them correctly. Not a very common practice nowadays

                They should come to Tasmania then. There's a very nice wooden boat building school not five minutes drive from where I'm sitting.

                http://australianwoodenboatschool.com.au/

                I imagine I'll be having breakfast next door tomorrow morning at the Living Boat Trust

                http://lbt.rforster.org/

          2. John Arthur
            FAIL

            Re: Alternative fuels

            @ x 7: Rubbish. 'self-regenerating' and 'sustainable' are not the same thing. Sustainable forests are usually well managed by people, not by nature. Trees are mature long before the 'three hundred years' you quote and those that are that age are past their best and, yes, diseased and dying. It's called old age.

            1. x 7

              Re: Alternative fuels

              @ John Arthur

              Clear felling all the usable trees and not planting replacements until its too late (which is what happened) is not by any mechanism "sustainable".

              Real "sustainable" would have meant cropping the trees at a rate at which continuous ongoing exploitation without loss of the reserves would have been possible. That didn't happen. To be honest it doesn't happen very often: even so-called sustainable FSC accredited schemes are often than not more a paper masque over a totally unsustainable felling regime.

              In reality the only provable sustainable large-scale forestry operations are those which use softwoods for paper production, with the felling on a relatively short 40-50 year cycle, or the even shorter-term coppiceing of willow or aspen for biofuel.

              But going back to the ships timbers: you'd be hard pushed to get a ships frame out of an oak thats less than 300 years old. Having said that, ideally you'd use elm as a better material but theres not much chance of that nowadays

            2. Pompous Git Silver badge
              FAIL

              Re: Alternative fuels

              Rubbish. 'self-regenerating' and 'sustainable' are not the same thing. Sustainable forests are usually well managed by people, not by nature. Trees are mature long before the 'three hundred years' you quote and those that are that age are past their best and, yes, diseased and dying. It's called old age.

              While you are correct that 'self-regenerating' and 'sustainable' are not the same thing, we do not know what might might be a truly sustainable farming or forestry system. All methods currently known result in topsoil loss at a rate greater than it is generated. Thus we can say that one system is more or less sustainable than another, but not be sustainable indefinitely.

              Also, Huon Pine is still in its infancy at 300 years and I have seen an intact stem that fell at the age of 2,300 years. As the chap who showed to me described it: "This tree was 300 years old while Jesus was playing full back for Jerusalem!" Huon Pine is in many respects the best boat-building timber of all.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Alternative fuels

      Whale Oil is a 'green' biofuel and obviously 'renewable' up to a point.

      Hunt the Whales!

      PS. Anyone checked their methane emissions?

      1. GrumpenKraut
        Coat

        Re: Alternative fuels

        > Anyone checked their methane emissions?

        How do you think they propel and what causes their "songs"?

      2. DanceMan
        Joke

        Re: Whale Oil

        Whale Oil Beef Hooked!

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    'powered by beef fat'

    God help every nation on the planet if the Americans ever find a way to power these things on bullshit....they have an inexhaustible supply of the stuff!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: 'powered by beef fat'

      An inexhaustible supply of bullshit will work fine so long as the ships are somehow propelled by dung beetles.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: 'powered by beef fat'

        Stop giving DARPA ideas!

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: 'powered by beef fat'

        "An inexhaustible supply of bullshit will "

        a.k.a. an election campaign .... they have a fuel surplus coming up.

        How do you measure quantities of bullshit, anyway? By the trump? By the corbyn? (just to stay right / left balanced, don't all shout at once)

        1. Andy 97

          Re: 'powered by beef fat'

          As American corporations seek to monetise everything, perhaps the missiles that are fired are preceded by a PA message "this armed munition is brought to you by McDonald's... we're lovin' in".

          I feel sad that the day has come that even the propellant of a warship is grounds for another press release.

        2. a_yank_lurker

          Re: 'powered by beef fat'

          Measuring bullshit - you have the following units: Clinton, Sanders, Christie (a rather large load), Cruz, Bush.

          1. Pompous Git Silver badge

            Re: 'powered by beef fat'

            Measuring bullshit - you have the following units:

            What's with leaving Australia out of this? Bet you never had a Minister for Communications who claimed "unfettered legal power" over telecommunications regulation, including the ability to request Australian telcos "wear red underpants on their head".

          2. x 7

            Re: 'powered by beef fat'

            "Measuring bullshit - you have the following units: Clinton, Sanders, Christie (a rather large load), Cruz, Bush."

            In comparative terms, how big is a Palin or a Trump? Presumably they dwarf everything else?

            1. a_yank_lurker

              Re: 'powered by beef fat'

              @ x 7 Trump was measured previously but a few overlooked units: Rubio, Carson, Bloomberg, Obama, Ryan, Pelosi, McConnell, Reid (from Nevada), all A-List Hollywierd celebrities. - I do not have a high opinion of the feral overlords. As for other countries, I am sure there are deserving units for dishonorable mention.

        3. John Brown (no body) Silver badge
          Mushroom

          Re: 'powered by beef fat'

          "How do you measure quantities of bullshit, anyway? By the trump? "

          I think you may have just invented the perfect term for measuring bullshit. I propose this be added to the El Reg SI Units page forthwith.

          For those unfamiliar with the word trump in English, it's a word to describe a fart, a noxious emission of gastric gases, a small explosion between the legs, flatulence, a bottom burp, a honker, thunder from down under, sphincter whistle, arse trumpet, trouser ripper and so on.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: 'powered by beef fat'

            You've been at the 'Profanisaurus' haven't you:)

    2. a_yank_lurker

      Re: 'powered by beef fat'

      @AC - Just insert a hose in the mouths the Congress Critters and the US will be powering the world with energy left over.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

    How about: THE USS BIG MAC

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      USS Beefsteak

    2. Blipvert
      Coat

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      D' ya want fries with that nickname?

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      USS OFFAL?

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      The USS VEGAN PLATTER

    5. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      The USS Mayor McCheese

    6. Blipvert

      Re: The vessel needs a people friendly nickname

      The USS GINSTERS (yum)

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like