Qute rat, I want one :)
Used to have a big white rat as a pet many years ago. Makes lovely pets!
As police across Europe crack down on the use of the DroidJack malware, a similar software nasty has emerged that can control not just Android, but also Windows, Mac, and Linux systems and is being sold openly at a fraction of the cost. The remote-control tool, detected by security firm Avast, is called OmniRAT and appears to …
In my youth, my brother and I had a pair of mice as pets, Luke and Marmalade. One morning we found that Luke had been (mostly) eaten by Marmalade. We re-christened the survivor "Marama-luke" and got on with it. Taught me a lot about life.
There's nothing objectively wrong with rodents as pets. Weeds are just plants growing where you don't want them and vermin/pests are just animals in a place where you don't want them. (Eye of the beholder, to each his own, if you could see her through my eyes, etc.)
May I suggest to the person who disagrees with me, that you should pay a visit to Australia sometime, and spend a week or two around the farms during grain harvest. I think the experience would make you rather less defensive of our little rodent friends!
This post has been deleted by its author
This post has been deleted by its author
If the (L)user is daft enough to bend over and say "do me", it will take a very hardened OS to completely stop the action. This is especially so if the (L)user keeps jumping through hoops to allow the crap to install.
Is it time that users were licensed, in some cases they should have a licence to even draw breath.
Apple recently introduced rootless mode, which means there are some things even the root user can't do by default. Whether this would be enough to stop attacks that depend on a clueless user remains to be seen, and I don't know if anyone else has a similar system implemented in their operating system.
Doesn't have to be violent, can be done quite nicely.
As I've read elsewhere, there's nothing illegal about remote access tools in most places. I think it needs to be pointed out that the version of the software being sold is distinct from the viral form, which uses the toolkit.
It's trivial to find the site selling "omnirat" and browsing the site (with lynx/w3m/in a VM) lists the features as basically only providing a remote administration tool. No mention of exploits or nefarious installation routes. For comparison, I can still download back orifice from sourceforge (for free).
Implying that the plods should/will take down the vendor's site just demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the above, IMO.