or you just carry on using dropbox.
That dreaded syncing feeling: Will Microsoft EVER fix OneDrive?
Microsoft and synchronisation go back a long way. Remember Briefcase, a feature of Windows 95 and later, which syncs files between two folders, one of which can be on a removable drive or on the network? Briefcase was mostly replaced by offline network shares that synchronise local and server copies, a feature which remains in …
COMMENTS
-
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:19 GMT Avatar of They
Exactly
Dropbox it appears as a folder in your documents, you can have as many subfolders as realistic and everything syncs. Android, Linux Mint and Windows 7 all just sync.
Well that is how I use it.
MS should just copy dropbox. (I would say buy drop box but I like dropbox and want to continue to use a good product.)
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:38 GMT Test Man
Re: Exactly
"MS should just copy dropbox. (I would say buy drop box but I like dropbox and want to continue to use a good product.)"
What Microsoft are doing to OneDrive in Windows 10 is exactly how it works in Dropbox, and exactly how it worked in Windows 8. It was Windows 8.1 that introduced the "placeholders" feature, and judging by a rep for Microsoft's comment on the matter, they plan to drop it.
However, if you read the article, there are numerous problems with readopting a "selective sync" approach, one of which is that if you hide files in Windows Explorer, they aren't viewable or useable in Windows Explorer. The proposed "fix" for this (allowing you to search offline) isn't good enough - how do they think you're going to be able to find that one pic of your 8-month old in a cute outfit amongst thousands of "DSCFxxxx,jpg" filenames?
No matter how it's spun, removing placeholders is a step backwards, plain and simple.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:25 GMT Gavin McMenemy
Eh no. Dropbox is actually fairly terrible in many enterprise environments. And their support is terrible if you end up in one of those.
Mind you, OneDrive .... Oh I've been there with OneDrive.
Essentially you're swapping one issue for a dfferent set.
I'm starting to lean more in favour of setting up your own cloud and dealing with Sync that way. Although the VIPs really do like the recognisable names...
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 11:44 GMT Anonymous Coward
MAybe not now, but it means in the long run I can have a fairly amount of files in OneDrive - that can esily exceed the local space I want to be occupied, and could require too much time or available bandwith to sync.
And anyway, designing a system to let user sync up to a 1TB is fairly diffent than one designed to sync just a few GB.
-
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 09:25 GMT Anonymous Coward
DPA?
Since DropBox's servers are in San Francisco, any British company storing personal data there could well be breaching the Data Protection Act (principle 8). MS may not be perfect (although I have the regular consumer version and it works fine for everything I need) but at least we can choose the country that the server is based in.
-
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:10 GMT Matt_payne666
dropping the placeholders is a real pain... I like the 'full' folder view on my companion devices, the thing that was missing was a clear indicator that a file was local or remote all folders and files looked like local files unless you concentrated on the status bar and noticed its status...
that icon is now fixed... a big green tick overlays synchronised files, while a grey icon signifies files that are due to sync... perfect - but now it looks very sparse in my folders, if I require a non-synced file I need to open onedrive, hunt the bugger down and copy it manually... if I want to save it back im forced to use the client to put it back in its rightful place in my folder structure...
this is all preview software, but I hope they replace the placeholders...
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:14 GMT jnemesh
Screw OneDrive, when are they gonna fix WINDOWS????
Sorry MS, but I have lost all confidence in your ability to provide WORKING software for my machines. Aside from work (where we just upgraded a couple months ago to Windows 7 machines), I have ZERO use for your company, your products, or your online services in my life. I am living just fine without your bloated code, your "metro" interface, and your underpowered, NSA-friendly console.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 07:02 GMT tempemeaty
Re: Screw OneDrive, when are they gonna fix WINDOWS????
"About 1% of us"
I agree. ~1% is true for Linux global OS market share statistics.
Sorry if I wasn't completely clear. I mean that in all sincerity. When I say "us," I mean those who read The Register. I could be wrong but I get the sense that the readers of the The Register don't all fit the statistical norm.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 15:12 GMT TheAnt
Re: Screw OneDrive, when are they gonna fix WINDOWS????
OS Market share?
Do you mean desktops? might be 1%
Servers? Has to be rather higher? Wikipedia quote a finger of 36% for web servers, for what its worth.
Total sales? Linux probably outsold Windows last year thanks to all those phones, set top boxes, printers, routers, NAS boxes and the trillion and one other sorts of things that run Linux that don't look like a PC. Android sales are about 250M/y while PC sales managed 75M/y.
So it looks like Linux is used by more than 1% of us.
Most people run Windows on their PCs because they have no real choice. When people are given a choice very few people chose Windows, I mean look at the phone market place, what did Windows manage here? Did they manage 2.5% market share? and that's despite tons of TV advertising and trying to buy market share.
-
-
-
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:39 GMT Anonymous Coward
I've had my fair share of problems with folder syncing from all the big players <cough> no official Linux Google Drive client</cough>. What I don't understand though is why it seems to be so damn hard for them to get right. The way I see it this problem is just a simplified version of source code management. Sure you aren't typically working with text files but the whole sync'ing thing is basically the same. Why do all the companies shy away from pushing the syncing choices onto the users. When there's a conflict just ask the user, teach them they have to manage their files. It's not like they will ever be doing a merge, they just have to pick the version they want to keep.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:57 GMT Anonymous Coward
Yep! Have an upvote. The problem is a direct match to the one that developers have pretty much cured due to massively distributed teams. Not by choice. Necessity can be a real Mother. I don't care what Microsoft calls it, it's still not functioning reliably here.
Personally I use BTSync due to the simplicity of linking devices for the basic stuff. (How can you argue with a QRCode doing the dirty details?) For the seriously difficult (terabyte+), it's SpiderOak. My account with them really is unlimited (such a deal!), encrypted with only my key, and just works.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 17:18 GMT frank ly
re. Linux Google Drive client
I use Insync with my two Google accounts. It costs $10 per account for a perpetual license on as many machines as you like. It works nicely and you can have selective syncing of folders. I also have my 5GB Dropbox folder tucked inside one of my Google Drive synced folders, hence giving dual redundancy for cloud storage of 'important' documents (note: only do this on your 'main' computer because I think there's a possibility of sync oscillation. On your other machines, have Dropbox in an isolated folder.)
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 19:45 GMT Will Godfrey
But But But
You can't let ordinary users loose on anything even remotely resembling version control! Sooner or later they would have to make decisions and it is this that MS, Goog etc. are trying to protect them from. I can just hear the wailing now:
"Hello support. My computer told me I had two versions of the same file but woudn't tell me which one was the best. Well obviously I chose mine instead of Fred's but the computer must have done something wrong because I now have an empty document. Fred isn't happy either. He says he's got the same thing. I tried to use the 'retrieve' feature, but now neither of us have any files at all. Don't be siily of course there is, only it's got a strange name. Yes I'm absolutely sure... It's R. E. S. E. T.
... Oh
How do we get our files back then?
No come on, stop messing about. We need this stuff.
???"
{slam}
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 02:33 GMT joed
I'd not consider file sync an easy problem. Maybe in situation where all synced devices have persistent network connection, aligned system clock and minimal latency of network connection (the last two are lesser issues and/or can be worked around). Just consider the possibility of a file edited on two systems and then having to chose what version to keep (and what work to lose). Now multiply this by number of files in synced folders (and just give up). Myself I'm not a fan of syncing - neither I like the system deciding on my behalf nor I like the idea of sorting it out myself.
My preference is just to have "online/onedrive folder" where I drop the stuff I'm OK with compromising my ownership rights (yep, once in cloud always in cloud). Not to mention that I "loved" the view of my drive going into red as stupid onedrive was chewing up free space (small SSD I will admit but so what) to cache synced items. I'd like MS to give me the option to use their OD as offsite storage with no sync and local copies. Too much to ask?
-
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 16:58 GMT big_D
Tablets
Having a Samsung ATIV SmartPC 500 with 64GB and a Surface Pro 3 with 256GB, I hope that they sort it out before Windows 10 gets to release. The current functionality is great, I can see all of my 250GB of photos, plus the other documents and videos on OneDrive. How I am supposed to squeeze them all into what remains of the 64GB on the ATIV, if I want to browse them, I don't know...
This sounds very much like a work in progress, so I am not too worried, yet...
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 17:00 GMT Tom Betz
The signal flaw in OneDrive/OneDrive for Business
There is one flaw in both versions of OneDrive that is so egregious that it makes all the others look piddly.
Unlike Box, DropBox and Google Drive, one is not permitted to reconfigure where the locally synced copy of OneDrive resides; it must reside inside the user's Windows Profile.
That makes both versions of OneDrive sync incompatible with a key feature of Windows for corporate users, roaming profiles. You think it might slow adoption somewhat?
Stupid. Simply stupid.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 17:56 GMT Chris Miller
Re: The signal flaw in OneDrive/OneDrive for Business
I use the consumer version at home. I have a C-drive (SSD) for Win8.1 and a D-drive (rotating rust) for data, with the local copy of OneDrive on D (configured that way at setup). Unless I've misunderstood, you're claiming that isn't possible (works for me)?
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 17:57 GMT NJunk
Re: The signal flaw in OneDrive/OneDrive for Business
Is this actually correct for onedrive ? I don't think so
(http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/onedrive/wiki/sdoptions-sdfileset/move-the-onedrive-folder/147dade2-830b-46ee-bf7e-36a8eab9446a)
I really wish I had seen this article before recommending onedrive for business to customers ( lucky it was few in number and now no more)
As soon as I discovered the only solution to corrupted database was a resync it was game over
We found onedrive to be absolutely fine mind.
-
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 17:02 GMT A Butler
Their are issues with Google drive aswell..
To be fair I have had issues with Google drive and file / folder syncing on the iPad aswell. All these services have their minor niggles however in general they all work great considering they have to work across such a variety of poor inconsistent internet connections. Plus do not get me started on iCloud and the inflexibility of viewing files in a simple web browser!
Obviously The Reg is going to highlight the errors in the Microsoft service.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 18:38 GMT John Riddoch
Synctoy
Synctoy is basically rsync wrapped up in a GUI. That said, it does the job passably well and has a command line interface for scripted usage. I use it for a few tasks, mainly ad-hoc backups and syncing the MP3 collection from NAS to SD card (to go into my phone). It might not have advanced in 5 years, but it doesn't really need any more features/bloat.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 21:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
VCS solved this issues àlong ago...
I don't understand why MS can't adopt a VCS model... show what files are local, which are not, and which needs to sync... also I'd like to avoid to sync everything on my SSD disks or phone, having 1TB available on OneDrive means there are files I wish to open on demand only, and that could be stored in a sort of local cache of limited size.
Use different icons to show it, and if some users don't understand what icons means, give them an Android phone, it's all they can use...
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 21:37 GMT Tezfair
Recent trials
Customer has 10 remote offices / single user at each and all have Office 2013. Outlook is already syncing to on premise server. File server in HQ to be accessed by staff, with files shared out to the external staff.
Have tried BTSync, but it's not a 'commercial' product and still under development
Currently using OwnCloud to sync the files to each office, but slow ADSL causes issues on folder operations.
So this weekend just gone, thought I would have a little play with alternatives. Googl drive seemed the most likely way forward, cheap, lost of space but the moment I opened an excel spreadsheet, it was converted to gsheet and saved as such, so the HQ staff can't open it in Office.
So tried O365 despite vowing to never touch it. Trialed ODFB as all they need is the ability to open docs on line and sync back the changes to the file server for the local staff. Should have been the ideal product. Not a chance....
ODFB sync tool crashes constantly, assuming it's not running the cpus at no less than 25%
Discovered that there is a 20k file limit despite a large storage capacity
Very slow uploads, I mean 3Gb over the weekend slow
Then I started to have a play...
Online word, yes you can open a file, but there's no 'Save as', you can't import a picture from the O365 library nor rename files.
I know you can download to a local word. I know I can install ODFB on each machine and sync, but the point was to have a single central sync and the external staff work 100% within a browser. They have simple tasks, simple spreadsheets so a browser based office should be more than enough for their needs.
It could have been a great product, but it's not quite there yet.
-
Tuesday 18th November 2014 22:54 GMT HandleOfGod
OneDrive vs Dropbox
After qualifying for an offer with Dropbox I received an extra 30GB space FOC. Great - so I put my main documents drive on my computer there and have worked like that for some time. Sadly the space was not enough to put all my files, so just My Docs. And then a couple of months ago I received a note saying the extra space was expiring. As it happened I was already looking at coughing up actual money so I could put all my files in the cloud so the expiry of the extra space simply focussed my attention.
With Dropbox and OneDrive both offering 1TB for £79 per year the decision was essentially won by the fact that with OneDrive you also got a copy of Office 2013 for your household and various devices thrown in. Plus the 1TB was for each household user. Also it's app for Android is better. So OneDrive it was and I duly coughed up.
Fast forward a couple of months and I have come to understand quite how crappy the OneDrive client is compared to the Dropbox one. My experience of the Dropbox client was that it was super quick and efficient - changes made synced instantly and moving or copying files around took less than 3 seconds to understand the changes. Making changes through the web UI you can see the changes applied to the local computer in Explorer in real time. Surely OneDrive would be the same?
No.
Whenever any changes are made on the computer, instead of instantly updating like Dropbox, OneDrive's app goes into a "looking for changes" procedure which last about 30-60secs before then going into a "processing changes" procedure which takes about the same time. Whatever it is doing causes my 6 core CPU sufficient trauma that the cooling fans spin louder and louder until they are howling. If you continue to move files around whilst this is going on the procedures essentially loop continuously, always changes applying about 2-3 mins behind you and the constant churn of the app and whine of CPU fan.
Worse, there is no block level sync. So, for example, change one word in the ID tag of a 15MB MP3 file and watch Dropbox silently sync the change in around 8 secs. Do the same on OneDrive and watch 2 mins of "looking for changes / processing changes" followed by another 2 mins of uploading the entire file all over again. You can just imagine what it's like if you batch rotate a bunch of 15MB JPEG's!
But it gets worse. Move a file on OneDrive and after 2 mins of a whining CPU fan it does recognise the change and go back to sleep. But copy that same file and it goes and uploads the whole thing again! So copy (rather than move) 30GB of images, for example, as I had to do recently (don't ask) and OneDrive required 83 hours to upload a bunch of images it already had! Dropbox marks the whole thing as done in less than 10 secs. Honestly, the two products don't even belong on the same page.