nav search
Data Centre Software Security DevOps Business Personal Tech Science Emergent Tech Bootnotes
BOFH
Lectures

back to article
'Theoretical' Nobel economics explain WHY the tech industry's such a damned mess

Say no to eccentric headline capitalization. It blights the Reg front page and makes our RSS feeds ugly.

2
2
Anonymous Coward

WHY?

7
0

Sometimes I can't tell whether something in a headline is about "US" the country, or "US" the emphasised collective of El Reg readership.

"GIANT FLAMING BADGERS are out to get US!"

4
0
Silver badge

"Sometimes I can't tell whether something in a headline is about "US" the country, or "US" the emphasised collective of El Reg readership."

Bloody Yanks eh? If they'd give their country a proper name, rather than a vague and arguably inaccurate description we wouldn't have this problem.

Suggestions on a postcard please.

4
0

Integrated States?

3
0
Silver badge

"Integrated States"

Nope, still descriptive (and the abbreviation might get a bit difficult as to who's fighting whom in the Middle East).

I demand a simple proper name. Mercania would do.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Merkinland?

4
0
Silver badge

The kingdom of Merkia ?

0
1
Silver badge

"I demand a simple proper name." (for the US)

Hmm, In my opinion, 'Arrogant' would fit properly these days.

3
1

Becuase capitalization MAKES TEXT harder to read, something EVERY El REG HACK learned in THEIR first week ON THE job. It ALSO "sounds" like THE AUTHOR shouting RANDOMLY. And IT makes me WANT to SURF AWAY to the ENQUIRER, Slashdot, Reddit or ANOTHER news site that FOLLOWS a less annoying STYLE guide.

And! compare! the! way! The! Register! actually! takes! the! mickey! out! of! Yahoo! LIKE! this! just! for! having! an! exclamation! point! At! least! Yahoo! can! write! a! sane! headline!

And stop trolling Steven Fry FFS.

1
1
Silver badge

Hey! I resemble that remark!

0
0
Silver badge

Hawtony - Hawaii to New York.

Or Mintex - Minnesota to Texas.

Or hyphenate those two into a distinguished double-barrelled name.

0
0
Gold badge
Unhappy

"The kingdom of Merkia ?"

Bad choice.

From there tis but a short step to Merkin Supremacy

0
0

Fredonia!!

It was originally on the list of possible names

Later popularized by the Marx Brothers

0
0
Anonymous Coward

"Becuase capitalization MAKES TEXT harder to read, something EVERY El REG HACK learned in THEIR first week ON THE job. It ALSO "sounds" like THE AUTHOR shouting RANDOMLY. And IT makes me WANT to SURF AWAY to the ENQUIRER, Slashdot, Reddit or ANOTHER news site that FOLLOWS a less annoying STYLE guide.

And! compare! the! way! The! Register! actually! takes! the! mickey! out! of! Yahoo! LIKE! this! just! for! having! an! exclamation! point! At! least! Yahoo! can! write! a! sane! headline!

And stop trolling Steven Fry FFS."

There, there.

Feel better now? :)

1
0
Silver badge

Looking back

> This year the prize goes to something useful in the real world,

Well, useful in that it explains some of our past and current tech-company phenomena. But since it's scope does not include a model or any predictive powers, it is not very helpful in charting the future. Regulating past excesses and abuses is still a wise move, but the technology world is (in)famous for coming up with workarounds for inconvenient consumer protections.

2
2
Anonymous Coward

The biggest case for not regulating

Is not necessarily that regulation is bad, but that regulators invariably end up doing in badly. Take the regulation of pay, for example. The British governmen's procliviy to subsidising bad businesses*, is a long standing case in point.

* By subsidising pay, through working tax credits, for example.

5
0
Silver badge

I don't care what he says...

All regulation is bad. I know because I read it some novel written by some chick called Ann Randy or something

<Insert Icon for extreme sarcasm here>

15
3
Silver badge

The tech industry is in a mess for one simple reason:

It is run by marketards with absolutely zero tech savvy.

Regulation, when it comes to technology, is meaningless.

2
2

Re: The tech industry is in a mess for one simple reason:

Jake, when it comes to technology, is meaningless.

9
1
Silver badge

@ CCCP (was: Re: The tech industry is in a mess for one simple reason:)

You are probably right. "Jake" hasn't posted since 7 Nov 2008.

c.f. http://forums.theregister.co.uk/user/26670/

0
2
Gold badge
Unhappy

Jake, when it comes to technology, is meaningless.

Amusing, but not terribly creative.

Needs work.

0
0
Silver badge
Thumb Up

And yes, the answer is always informed by our interest in consumers: to go back to the Google example, whatever we do about that search dominance is going to depend on how well consumers do out of it. What the people at Foundem think about it all is irrelevant.

It's amazing how few of your fellow Reg journalists appear to get that last point.

4
0
Windows

Economists

Has anyone ever heard of a case where an economist has admitted making a mistake? Even a really trivial one that didn't have negative consequences for millions of ordinary working people??

4
0
Silver badge

Re: Economists

Na - it was always a bull or bear moving the goalposts.

0
0

Re: Economists

The IMF has apologised over the last couple of years...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/03/an-amazing-mea-culpa-from-the-imfs-chief-economist-on-austerity/

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-08/lagarde-says-imf-got-it-wrong-on-rallying-u-k-economy.html

Sorry, not allowed HTML it seems :(

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Economist stupidity and ingrown "development"

"The IMF has apologised over the last couple of years..."

Amazing. Simply...amazing.

The IMF and World Bank have, what are considered, complete and utter failures in regards to Argentina and most of South America, plus Africa, to the point that countries are refusing IMF assistance, and NOW they apologize...for the SAME policy stupidity that Naomi Klein called them out for in The Shock Doctrine all the way back in 2007??

"Give a business person a college degree, remove their brain for a lifetime" may be the new truism for economists and MBA's in the new millennium.

3
1
WTF?

Re: Economist stupidity and ingrown "development"

"The IMF and World Bank have, what are considered, complete and utter failures in regards to . . . "

In regards to whom? The poor of those irresponsible countries, or a handful of wealthy people who have profited from irresponsible economic behavior of the people/leaders.

2
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Economist stupidity and ingrown "development"

"In regards to whom?"

Do you know ANYTHING of what you talk about?

How about the IMF ITSELF

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3566699.stm

as well as scholarly economist analysis

https://www.google.com/search?q=argentina+imf+failure

Please read up more on economic policy and IMF actions prior to commenting, especially when said commenting is an attempt to sound knowledgeable yet lay blame on the victims of poor policy.

Thank you.

2
2
Silver badge
Pint

Re: Economists

Yes, quite often but usually in the graduate context, not in public. It is happening more often these days with the rapid dissemination of damaging information. Much harder to keep it swept under the rug now. About time.

On a personal note, I've found it requires a Hell of a lot more effort than to simply admit a mistake early on, correct course, and move on. In either engineering and economics, it keeps the body count lower. (I've seen enough of those having done both.)

2
0
Silver badge

Hedging with words

This article, and some others from Worstall, remind me of the legendary Professor Iffsen Butz, head of multidisciplinary studies at Vaguest County State College.

0
3
bep

Unfortunately

"Tirole's biggest finding is that the correct answer is, as the correct answer so often is in economics, “it depends”. We need to look at the details of that specific market and see how changing regulation and oversight would actually impact upon current behaviour, before we can decide what, if anything, should be done."

Since economics isn't a real empirical science no one can do that. You can estimate, predict or just guess, but you won't know until you try. You might then adjust the regulations if they aren't working as expected, but again you won't know the actual result of doing that until you actually do it. I'm not suggesting that all regulation is pointless, just that the basic premise of this particular argument is faulty.

0
0
Gold badge
IT Angle

so he's actually built a model you can make predictions on?

Which raises the question if one wanted to compete with Google or Facebook what would work?

Sounds quite intriguing actually as I've often wondered if there was theory behind these 2 sided markets (I didn't even know what they were called).

Keep in mind any software IDE is also one of these. Delphi, Eclipse, MS Developer Studio (in alphabetical order) etc.

So yes, quite clever stuff.

0
0

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing