New Reg mobile site - feedback here!

This topic was created by vgrig_us .

Page:

  1. vgrig_us

    New Reg mobile site sucks.

    Thank you Register for making m.theregister.co.uk completely unusable!

    What were you thinking!

    1. visited link don't change color - can't find last port i read easily;

    2. going back in the browser doen't takes you to the same place in the page you you ;eft it from;

    3. links are broken.

    All for what? So you can annoy me with few more ads?

    I've been Reg reader for over 10 years and one of the reasons why - you treated your readers right.

    Now - fire the marketing and design morons who f*(&^ked up the mobile site and maybe you won't lose your core readers.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: New Reg mobile site sucks.

      Thanks for your feedback. Our dev team has ripped out a load of old cruft from the code and is now working through bug fixes and UI improvements. We will have a point release in the next few days, so please bear with us.

      Some readers have commented about Mobile in Ye Bug list thread - better if you log-in and read most recent view first.

      BTW we have about 20K readers of m.theregister.co.uk, a small fraction of the numbers who access the full fat site via their mobile. When we get this right we will switch to auto direct.

      1. Mint Sauce

        Re: New Reg mobile site sucks.

        I'm afraid I agree that the mobile site is currently unusable. It's even starting to make the el Reg Windows Phone app look good - which is an amazing achievement in itself ;-)

        Hopefully you'll get it sorted soon, though I'd prefer just a simple list of articles rather than trying to make it a mini version of the main site. I appreciate I'm part of an ever dwindling number of people who just like some actual text on the screen though!

        Your comment about auto detecting worries me - will I be able to choose which site to view or are you going all BBC we-know-best-so-screw-you on us!?

        Cheers!

      2. vgrig_us

        Re: New Reg mobile site sucks.

        These are not bugs - at least visited links one - that was a choice someone made, since it's not a default behevior. As far as i know you still have to specify a:link and a:visited colors - otherwise it's whatever browser considers default.

      3. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

        We have updated site to squash most major bugs and the 'whizzy' features that have caused issues/friction.

        Some of the included changes are:

        - Updated navigation

        - Font sizes increased across all pages

        - Incorrect links pointing to desktop updated

        - Forum template tidied up

        - Alignment issues fixed

        Feedback welcome!

        1. vgrig_us

          Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

          Still same problem (more like idiotic design) - when are you gonna fire the mororn responsible for:

          - visited link don't change color - can't find last port i read easily;

          And i can't even begin to understand why you want to "switch to auto-detect for phones" - you audience is people who (mostly) know to TCP in TCP/IP stands for - we're perfectly capable of adding "m" to url.

          And if you scew up with mobile site design (which looks like your well on your waying doing) switch auto-detect on will mean i personally won't be reading Reg anymore - cause i ain't playing with god damn agent strings on mobile browaser!

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

            so you don't like the lack of visited links state. Anything else?

            Our design / navigation has to work for occasional readers, for blow-ins, for visually impaired, for the lazy, for the people who come in using Twitter or Feedly links on their phones - as well as regular readers who are willing to type that m.

            1. vgrig_us

              Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

              If visited links are done properly and and you add "switch to desktop version" link at the top of mobile site, that would bring functionality on par with old mobile site - you can start from there with additional improvements.

              One more thing - back button should bring back the previous page even if internet access is lost for a moment - it seems like i'm pulling the page reload with new mobile site when i press "back". That means i'll get "no internet connection" error instead of cached listing of stories.

              1. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

                So visited links on desktop is sub-optimal - lighter grey - and we are currently discussing options here. It has not been a deliberate decision to not have mobile visited links - it is just that we parked it until we made decision.

                Incidentally the link to desktop version from mobile has always been at the bottom of the page.

            2. vgrig_us

              Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

              One more thing - date and time for stories.

            3. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: http://m.theregister.co.uk point release live on April 17

              "Our design / navigation has to work for occasional readers, for blow-ins, for visually impaired, for the lazy, for the people who come in using Twitter or Feedly links on their phone" - So make the site responsive and stop pissing about with outdated technologies.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Err, shouldn't you be using an adaptive layout on the main site and dumping the whole desktop / mobile split? Every time I get dumped onto a mobile version of a website I find myself rapidly looking for a way to switch back to the desktop one.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      More expensive option

      Adaptive is more time consuming to implement (much bigger scope); any new features/changes would have to also work on mobile before going live and therefore more testing is required. This is not on our agenda any time soon.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: More expensive option

        I felt exactly the same when I started looking at putting mobile support into an ecommerce application.

        But if you use a framework like bootstrap or foundation (I prefer the latter), it's really a lot simpler than you think, at least if your CMS is already using some kind of page templates already. After doing it responsive, I reckon it took about a 5th of the time that creating a completely separate mobile site would take. Because all we really had to do was modify the templates; the content pages largely fell into place. All the features we considered non-essential and were planning to drop from the mobile version just fell into place, so we ended up with a fully-featured mobile support instead of a really cut-back second rate version.

        The work is predominantly just modifying the template. And if you're using a good framework, a lot of the cross platform support is handled for you anyway.

        Honestly, take a look at bootstrap or foundation. It will save you a ton of time, and the end result will be much, much better.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: More expensive option

        Adaptive is more time consuming to implement

        Not in my experience. You take the existing desktop site, rejig the templates and CSS, then you're done. From then on you essentially maintain one website rather than two. This assumes you're using a framework that cleanly separates the presentation layer, which the systems I've worked on always do.

    2. Stacy

      Exactly what I was thinking of!

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not keeping up with current fashion.

    You've missed out the banner, fixed at the top or side of the page that expands when you pinch zoom into the main text and thereby obliterates the stuff you were trying to zoom into. You also seem to have gone for a readable font, rather than the "Oh, lets use the smallest font the device will do" option that some sites go for. Another missed opportunity to keep up with fashion is that it loads and renders in a sensible time.

    However, you do seem to have come up with a compact, neat usable layout.

    Basically, it ignores current fashion and does the right things, and seems to do them well - I like it.

    Asus / Google Nexus 7, first gen. Stock Chrome browser.

  4. Goldmember

    Will it auto direct mobile users to the mobile site?

    Because I actually find the desktop site easy enough to use on a mobile device (HTC OneX+, Android 4.2.2, Chrome).

    With regard to the actual mobile site, I like the main header filters (Hardware etc.), but couldn't immediately see any sub header filters (Laptops, Tablets etc.), which I do use quite a lot. Although, I do like the auto formatting of the articles, so may give the mobile site a try for a few days.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Will it auto direct mobile users to the mobile site?

      It will work something like this: If you are on your mobile you will hit the mobile site you can then scroll down to the bottom and click desktop - at which point we can set a cookie to remember your preference.

      1. Stacy

        Re: Will it auto direct mobile users to the mobile site?

        Is it going to take notice of the 'Request Desktop Site' option in mobile browsers?

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Will it auto direct mobile users to the mobile site?

          Yes.

          1. monkeyfish

            Will it auto direct desktop users to the desktop site?

            That would be a pita. I use the mobile site on the desktop because it cuts the crap and just puts the articles on the page with proper re-flow of text.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Will it auto direct desktop users to the desktop site?

              Yes it will auto direct - but I think we will just do the reverse of what we will do on phone - put link to mobile at bottom of page and enable people to set cookie from there.

              1. monkeyfish

                Re: Will it auto direct desktop users to the desktop site?

                ok, that would be fine.

  5. Tom7

    RSS Feed Links

    One problem that hasn't been fixed is that the links in the RSS feed still land you at the desktop site (I'm using Feedly on Android). The procedure should be:

    * Default to mobile site for mobile devices/browsers

    * Give a link to the desktop site

    * And a cookie to make the selection permanent

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: RSS Feed Links

      A mobile friendly RSS feed is on our to do list.

      1. Tom7

        Re: RSS Feed Links

        Nice to see this fixed recently.

        1. Tom7

          Re: RSS Feed Links

          Though it seems to have reverted. Was I part of some A/B testing?

  6. csw.reeve

    I like everything except the new color scheme... Used to be able to tell if an article was visited or not, but cannot tell the difference in this version. Could it just be my color blindness?

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    wot no responsive

    It's 2014, I'd have thought anyone doing mobile support is going to be doing responsive now? It's surely better for so many reasons:

    - better support for tablets and other devices, not just two different fixed layouts

    - same URL for article on mobile/tablet/desktop - pretty much all browsers allow you to sync bookmarks between devices, and users posting links in forums and social media works much better if you don't have different mobile URLs

    - cuts down on duplicate code (as same code serves all devices), mobile site can be fully-featured instead of a second rate cut down neutered version that is often the case these days

    There is the issue that some old browsers (IE7/8) don't do so well with responsive, Foundation doesn't support IE8 or below. But we've found it simple to just put a server side detection on old devices and serve them back a non responsive template. It's not ideal, but then if you're on IE8, nothing is really and half the internet already won't work for you. So the reg looking a bit naff is going to be the least of your worries. And who on earth reading the reg is going to do so on IE8 or below?

  8. Red Bren

    Where is the content?

    I navigated to the mobile site on my SGS3 stock browser. Top half the screen taken up with an advert for Microsoft Cloud, bottom half filled with a picture attached to the main story.

    Now I don't object to adverts on El Reg, its a fair price for the service, but its not much of a service when you have to scroll a whole screen before you can see the headlines.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Where is the content?

      We never run pics above headlines. So I am not sure what you are seeing there - unless you have uncovered a bug.

      I have some sympathy with you over the size of the Microsoft ad. However, this size is standard and widely used on mobiles - although many sites down run ads midway down a story (sometimes as well as, sometimes instead of) and not the top, as we are currently doing.

      Also, the ad may be big - but surely everyone scrolls all the time when reading websites on their phone. Is this really so burdensome ( a genuine question, not rhetorical)?

      1. Tiny Iota
        Thumb Down

        Re: Where is the content?

        "We never run pics above headlines": I am seeing the same thing on an iPhone 5S in Safari.

        In order of what I see, top to bottom: Reg banner, massive microsoft ad, "Top Stories/Most Read" banner, big picture, then first headline (Then a few pictures alongside headlines, then normal headline/sub headline list).

        Also, there are no icons in the comments section (I know you said you have work to do on the comments, so I hope this is on the list)

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Where is the content?

          Gotcha! - my misunderstanding - I thought we were talking about a story page. My hunch is that position of big ad / hard against the top teaser pic is the issue here - and not the size of the top teaser pic. Does anyone here think different?

          On comment icons. We are having a mull about positioning

          1. Tiny Iota

            Re: Where is the content?

            It means due to the combined size of the ad and the top pic on the homepage, you have to scroll down an entire screen to even read the first headline. Bit of a pain to be honest (and I would have thought your advertisers would prefer users not to automatically have to scroll away from seeing their ad).

  9. The Man Himself Silver badge

    mobile vs desktop

    Personally I use the mobile site from my desktop, as I'm fed up with the flashy advert heavy content on the desktop site dragging my machine's performance down...is the move in the new mobile site towards more adverts? I hope not, as it could take me back to square one

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: mobile vs desktop

      You are one of very few people who do this - and I don't see why we would need to accommodate this in our thinking

      However, mobile phone ads tend not to be flash-tastic. Also we run no more than two per page, compared with three for desktop.

      1. vgrig_us

        Re: mobile vs desktop

        What? You "don't see why we would need to accommodate this in our thinking"?

        You have to - both sites should be usable on both mobile and desktop devices.

        Or, if you don't want to do all the work, you can subscirbe to very popular opinion that separate mobile sites are stupid - see the link below.

        http://www.artlebedev.com/mandership/177/

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Re: mobile vs desktop

          We have no intention of devoting time or resource to people who visit m.theregister.co.uk via their desktop. In the last month, fewer than 2000 people have visited the m.theregister.co.uk using a desktop. We will not stop people continuing to do this - and that surely is enough.

        2. NogginTheNog
          Flame

          Re: mobile vs desktop

          "subscirbe to very popular opinion that separate mobile sites are stupid - see the link below.

          http://www.artlebedev.com/mandership/177/"

          What a tosser! A mobile site is vital for those of us who can't afford, or heaven forbid don't wish to have the latest, flashiest, biggest wedges of mobile gadgetry in our pockets - or rather in our hands as they won't ever fit in any pocket!

  10. big_D Silver badge

    Images 2nd class citizens

    It looks fine on WP8.1 using IE 11 on a Lumia 1020.

    Only thing that got me was tapping away on the images next to the headline didn't take me to the story! They should be hyperlinked, like the headline, IMHO.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Auto detect opt-in?

    I like the new mobile site. Is there a way to opt-in to the auto-detect so that I start seeing the mobile version on my phone before the big switch is made for everyone?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Auto detect opt-in?

      You could always bookmark m.theregister.co.uk

  12. Fihart

    It works.

    On Blackberry (rather old) OS6 -- seems usable.

    Previously dumped the Reg from my mobile because the cookies reminder screen kept following me down the page, obscuring text, and I couldn't see to click to get rid of it.

    1. Fihart

      Re: It works. Update.

      Tried to sign in and couldn't. Can read stories and commentards, but not reply to the more ridiculous of the latter.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Re: It works. Update.

        I have signed in via mobile - so where did you try to sign in and couldn't?

        1. Fihart

          Re: It works. Update. @Drewc

          I figured it out eventually. Probably something to do with the small screen but initially I tried clicking on the wrong area and wondered why no letters appeared when I typed.

          See if anyone else has the same issue.

  13. Raumkraut
    FAIL

    Top stories

    As a regular Reg reader, what I want to see are the latest stories since I last visited. Unfortunately, it seems I can't get to the chronological list, without first having to scroll past all the "top stories" which either I've inevitably already read, or didn't care about in the first place. Add another tab or something, so it goes: "latest", "top stories", "most read". Bonus points if it remembers which section you were last on.

    And since I'm here, where the FUCK is HTTPS support? Asking people to log in to your website over an insecure connection! You are everything that is wrong with security on the Internet.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Top stories

      Just for the record, The top five stories are editorially selected headlines - and they change frequently during UK working hours. Everything after that is in reverse chronological order. I think that for most people visited links would suffice.

      On website encryption. We are working on this.

  14. monkeyfish

    m.forums

    1) Is the mobile forum going to get the edit post feature of the desktop version (I'll edit this myself if does already...)?

    2) Is the mobile version finally going to get post icons to choose from?

    3) It appears that text re-flow stops at a certain maximum width in the current implementation (it didn't with the old version, and also not in the article). Is that a concious decision? Not a big deal, but I'm not sure why you'd need to.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon