But then US crosswords lack the cryptic challenge of the toughest UK ones. Get back to me when Dr Fill can solve a Listener in under 3 weeks (I usually struggle to understand the rubric).
can make a computer a lateral thinker it will never be as good
But how would it fare with a UK broadsheet cryptic crossword?
And how woudl it handle the Guardian which, in the 70's managed, to publish the wrong grid for its Saturday Prize Crossword. Humans adapted well, and there were 135% *more* entrants than usual that weekend.
... although I understand the reason for restricting the "letter crunching" ability, how would it cope with a crossword clue I remember from many years ago which was simply:
Scroll down for the answer...
The answer was "Centre of gravity"! :-)
Re: Ok, but...
I was unfamiliar with the format of that clue (now I'll know in future what the numbers mean). That was the main reason I was tripped up. Just as Dr. Fill was likely tripped up by the nonstandard words (the backwards and diagonal words--your average crossword only runs the words to the right (across) and down.
Now, granted most US crosswords aren't that hard--they're not meant to be. They're meant to kill a half-hour or so on the kitchen table or on the train. Most papers typically publish their toughies on Sunday when people have more time to work on it (I know this is true for the New York Times crosswords--well-known for being particularly challenging among mass-printed crosswords).
The toughest crosswords (as well as their relatives like diagramless) are usually reserved for puzzle books so that hardcore solvers know where to look and casual solvers don't get frustrated.
or even better set it up against the ankh-morpork Times crossword
that one is supposed to be fiendishly difficult!
... if you get too many correct answers, the Patrician starts taking an interest in you.
like a broken record?