FreeOffice would be a better name. And less confusing to pronounce.
Who the hell thought that one up? Have all the good names already been taken or something?
Don't be such a monoglot...
The big problem with emphasising the "free" part is the risk of confuzzlement in the English language between "free as in beer" and "free as in speech". Hence the "Software Libre" tag that's been around for a while now.
It doesn't stop the name from being crap though
The gratis/libre thing is something only the neckbeards at FSF care about.
Not such a bad name...
When some people read "free", they think "low quality", and not "open". Also, despite the fact that plenty of people like me (and perhaps Paul Slater) have no ability with another language, it's sensible to be seen acknowledging the non-English speaking world in a product that seeks worldwide popularity.
Suggest a better name!
It says in the article, it's a temporary name.
"Office Libre" would be better, but perhaps vulnerable to a lawsuit from Microsoft. Which is probably the key. Now the project is out from under the corporate lawyer-shelter that was provided by Sun, it will have to tread much more carefully.
My guess is that the placeholder may have to be replaced by something not containing "Office" at all.
I'll start the suggestions ball rolling with "FreeDoc". At least it trips off the tongue OK.
Because it is Libre, not just Gratis. When people ask what the name means, they will learn something.
Given that FreeOffice would completely bugger any future efforts to sell it due to the whole misunderstanding of free beer / freedom thing, this might not actually be a bad idea. Especially since it begs explanation any time the name is used.
Yes, FreeOffice would be better, but...
They'll probably need to charge for it if they don't find a backer, do a paid-for version which has more features, or some kind of apps store.
"Why you trying to make me pay for this? It's free!"
Bang goes any support-wrapper or extended-capability version of the software.
Not even MS...
can trademark a word as generic as "Office".
acknowledging the non-English speaking world
I really don't think that's going to be a problem.
Have a look at http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/ and check the nationalities involved.
Paid for version?
"They'll probably need to charge for it "
From http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq/ :
Q: What difference will The Document Foundation make to users of LibreOffice?
A: LibreOffice is The Document Foundation's reason for existence. We do not have and will not have a commercial product which receives preferential treatment. We only have one focus - delivering the best free office suite for our users - LibreOffice.
Yes, because the supporters they have, Google, Canonical etc aren't gonna be able to stump up enough cash to keep it free
>Not even MS can trademark a word as generic as "Office".
Anywhere sensible, yes. US, no. After the way Apple just claimed 'Pad'?
What about "Easy" then?
Stelios can't trademark "Easy", but it doesn't stop him setting his lawyers on anyone who dares to trade as Easy anything. Not even if they were trading before EasyJet existed.
It costs money to defend a trademark against an infringement accusation. Money that a free project either doesn't have, or can better spend on other things.
Won't make a difference
I doubt very much most people, who don't already know the significance of the words, will learn anything other than the meanings of a couple of Latin words and then immediately forget them and go back to wondering why the software has such a crap name.
Basically, they've forked.
And taken the community with the, apparently, which is why this is a bigger news item than a typical fork would be. An open-source project, even one in the clutches of MS Junior, is nothing without the community.
Oracle policies like Apples, demented CEO's rule
This decision is a wise one given that Oracles policies seem to change on the whim of one man, much as Apples do.
With this instability it is hard to do business with these types of personality without catering to the personalities various mindsets.
Apples change on the whim of one man? Crikey.
Don't worry, I'll get it. It's the one with an extra apostrophe in the pocket.
That post was especially troubling
given that yesterday was National Punctuation Day in the States. (Who'd have thought anyone in the States knew anything about punctuation?)
have an entire sentence in brackets? I think you're looking for a semi colon.
National Punctuation Day
Such-and-Such days in the US of A typically exist to raise awareness for something... Some subjects are a little tougher and they create a whole month for it.
Give it a rest!
Christ, you really have got a bit of an obsession there, haven't you? The article doesn't mention Apple once, but you manage to find a tenuous link to spout your tire rhetoric. listen mate, WE GET IT! You don't have to tell us anymore.
I do hope they change it back to Open Office in the long term. I can't understand why Oracle would have any problem with this project, so why the need for a change of name?
Re: Oh dear
Please re-read the article -- Oracle has not been a friend to Open Source. Also, note that this actual project, 'OpenOffice' cannot be referred to by the media as OpenOffice because that name is a legally owned trademark by another company. That's why it's actually named, "OpenOffice.org."
Its not 1968 but I smell a whiff of the revolution. Not sure about the name either.
Personally I would find NotLarrysOffice a bit more attractive ...
What's in a name?
Yeah, I can't understand why they didn't go with Larry'sLeisureSuite or something.
That made me smile.
The name is OK. (to stay on topic.)
A welcome move...
... but I can't see Oracle giving up control over this so easily.
Let's hope that everything goes smoothly... staying tuned.
Don't be silly
Of course there is nothing Oracle can do. The software's source code is freely available and anyone can use it to set up their own office suite, which is what has been done in this case. Oracle have now got a lame-duck software package because the main contributers have left and produced their own version.
At least for the Benelux there is a chance it can be called OpenOffice (not OpenOffice.org) depending on wheter these guys (http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie) can do something about it. They are the original trademark owners of the name OpenOffice in the Benelux. They had that name years before Sun was thinking of open sourcing star office.
Seeing as they still own the trademark and weren't going to give it to Oracle/Sun, they aren't going to give it to the new group. Seeing as it'll be problematic (and stupid) having the software called two different things depending on the location, it definitely won't ever be called OpenOffice.
Well done, Libre Office!
No, Paul, 'Free' is totally misleading. It is not necessarily coming without cost, Free Of Charge. But it does come as software 'libre', that means it fulfills the requirements of liberty for software. James Huges 1, what do you suggest instead?
Used to produce French Letters.
I'll get me coat.
"OpenOffice.org project is now The Document Foundation"
Unfortunate that many of Sun's open projects are having to break away like this. But Oracle IS very quickly becoming the next closed-minded, closed-source micr0$haft. }:/
Considering the past actions/inactions of Oracle.. I'm very happy to see The Document Foundation break away from oracle. ;)
Will the domain name of the website change to reflect the organizations new name? So far, no news about any of this on the OpenOffice.org site.
No news on OOo
Since that's an Oracle-run site, I'm not surprised...
Sun project escape
The other project that needs to get out is VirtualBox.
That would be problematic.
OpenOffice is licensed under GPLv3 which confers patent protection, so Oracle cannot sue the producers/distributors/users of the LibreOffice fork.
VirtualBox, on the other hand, is licensed under GPLv2 which does not confer patent protection:
The domain name and OpenOffice.org will always be there, as it's its own project. LibreOffice is not a replacement, it's a fork.
This is why there was no point in worrying about MySQL and OpenOffice - you can't kill open source. If you shut down the project, someone will fork it. If you act like an arsehole, you lose control.
Nicely done, OOo.
Silence, running dogs of the Military Industrial Complex
What do you know about marketing? It shows that we're finally at libre to develop those vital missing features that had been holding "Open" (snort!) Office back from mainstream adoption: built-in support for Klingon, and an Emacs look-and-feel.
five years ago...
new keyboard alert
Funniest geek comment of the week.
how about BoxOffice?
not sure if it's a big hit, but surely will give sales a boost :-)
and you're done!
Wot, no links?
There seemed to be a distinct lack of links in this article, so here's a couple:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/ - Web site of the new Document Foundation.
http://www.documentfoundation.org/download/ - Download page for LibreOffice. Note the lack of a final version - all the downloads are for the 3.3.0 beta 1 version. A shame they launched the fork without actually having a stable version to download (something missed by the article....).
BTW, am I the only one who doesn't like the LibreOffice name because it's a French word mixed in with an English one, which is very clumsy indeed for an office suite containing a word processor whose English spelling checker rejects the word "libre"...
RE: Wot, no links?
"am I the only one who doesn't like the LibreOffice name because it's a French word mixed in with an English one"
'Libre' is free as in freedom in Spanish, so it's OK Rich.