tag:theregister.com,2005:feed/user/theregister.com/10759
The Register forum user: Chris C
2009-09-18T19:44:09Z
Copyright © 2024, Situation Publishing Ltd.
Chris C
https://forums.theregister.com/user/10759/
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/icons/favicon.png
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/Reg_default/The_Register_r.png
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/584593
2009-09-18T19:44:09Z
The best defense...
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/584590
2009-09-18T19:44:09Z
So remove the code
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/584536
2009-09-18T19:35:48Z
But it's NOT optional
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/581674
2009-09-16T00:37:03Z
Michael Moore
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/581520
2009-09-15T23:46:13Z
@tuna 1
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/580644
2009-09-15T09:45:11Z
@deegee
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/580454
2009-09-15T01:06:56Z
Slow is not necessarily bad
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/580441
2009-09-14T20:04:32Z
Accuracy?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/580525
2009-09-14T19:29:39Z
Autorun or AutoPlay?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/579784
2009-09-14T09:07:15Z
Yes, she IS guilty of a crime
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/578485
2009-09-11T10:08:11Z
People are funny
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/578479
2009-09-11T00:18:31Z
Egads, Brain!
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/578514
2009-09-10T23:46:05Z
Get better coders
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/578578
2009-09-10T22:43:50Z
But why?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/578528
2009-09-10T20:37:33Z
Talk about transparency
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/577607
2009-09-10T00:39:39Z
re: And so...
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/577600
2009-09-09T23:13:39Z
Who's allowed to access it?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/577379
2009-09-09T15:57:26Z
Accurate stats?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/576673
2009-09-09T07:48:46Z
@Bilgepipe
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/575010
2009-09-07T05:06:40Z
Can I laugh now...
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/573696
2009-09-03T23:26:18Z
No reason?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/573678
2009-09-03T21:22:42Z
Second time?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/570788
2009-08-31T06:55:21Z
Most disturbing
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/570689
2009-08-31T00:07:58Z
re: Then sue Google
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/570274
2009-08-28T20:51:30Z
@Scott
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/566722
2009-08-25T10:32:51Z
Egads, Brain!
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/566726
2009-08-25T10:26:13Z
Sigh
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/563881
2009-08-20T00:06:45Z
Why not?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/562812
2009-08-18T23:44:41Z
@AC 6:29
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/561040
2009-08-17T10:36:13Z
Yeah, sure, it's about the music
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/561044
2009-08-17T10:25:03Z
@AC 22:05
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/560803
2009-08-14T21:02:35Z
Why don't they want national health care?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/558838
2009-08-12T22:38:28Z
Insurance
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/554224
2009-08-06T00:12:42Z
I hate people
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/553173
2009-08-05T04:04:04Z
Counterfeit in what way?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/553107
2009-08-04T23:00:49Z
Mission-critical
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/552504
2009-08-04T10:59:40Z
Idiots and more idiots
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/551512
2009-08-03T10:02:51Z
Payment? What payment?
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/551397
2009-08-03T09:14:56Z
Spoofing and spam
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/551550
2009-08-03T08:43:40Z
re: Site problem, and browser problem
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/551378
2009-08-02T19:22:52Z
Browser problem, not site problem
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/550442
2009-07-31T11:42:59Z
The problem
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/549674
2009-07-30T12:44:20Z
@Shakje
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/549323
2009-07-30T09:09:48Z
Ah, yes, truly revolutionary
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/547237
2009-07-28T06:06:35Z
re: Disclaimers and E&OEs
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/546214
2009-07-27T09:19:38Z
No IE? Yeah right.
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/545208
2009-07-24T09:39:55Z
Possibly good idea, stupid implementation
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/541097
2009-07-18T17:23:37Z
re: That will not help them
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/538488
2009-07-15T22:53:36Z
Blasphemy
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/537733
2009-07-15T09:34:35Z
re: John Ashcroft