I'm confused ...
"The findings of the investigation were that Hurd had a close personal relationship with a contractor hired by the CEO’s office, with the relationship never disclosed to the board. The contractor received compensation although there had been no justified business reason, and improper expense reports had been submitted by Hurd."
OK, I get this bit ... Paying for a bit of stuff on the side on the company account. Big no-no, regardless of what field you work in. See Tiger Woods, for a rather egregious example.
However, said bit of stuff is a hooker, no more and no less ... Seriously, she or he accepted compensation for favo(u)rs of a sexual nature, right? Shouldn't s/he be up on charges for solicitation?
During the meanwhile, where does the "sexual harassment" come into it? Did Hurd suddenly start pointing and giggling at the hooker's body or sense of fashion or lack of business sense? Or did he come to his senses and stop paying it, and said bit of stuff decided to get vindictive?
All around, very strange.
